Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/558,670

PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENT, DROPLET DISCHARGE HEAD, FERROELECTRIC MEMORY, AND PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Priority
Jun 03, 2021 — JP 2021-093593 +1 more
Examiner
SAN MARTIN, JAYDI A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
870 granted / 1027 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1047
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
65.5%
+25.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1027 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the equation and the description of each element of the equation is not part of the sentence. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim must comprise only one sentence and end in an end period. Claim 1 has a period before the last word of the sentence. The examiner suggests adding the word “wherein” after the formula. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The specification fails to disclose how the coefficient B is obtained or what it means. Claims 1-4 and 6-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as based on a disclosure which is not enabling. The disclosure does not enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention without the PZT piezoelectric material composition, which is/are critical or essential to the practice of the invention but not included in the claim(s). See In re Mayhew, 527 F.2d 1229, 188 USPQ 356 (CCPA 1976). The specification describes …less degradation of piezoelectric characteristics in association with use can be provided, the piezoelectric element including a first electrode, a second electrode, and a piezoelectric film located between the first electrode and the second electrode by making a degree of degradation due to aging smaller under specific conditions of a Schottky barrier height between the second electrode and the piezoelectric film, and have achieved the present invention (paragraph [0013] of the printed publication). In paragraph [0086], “…in a case where the composition is represented by PbX(ZrY, Ti1-Y)O3 [0.5≤X≤1.5, 0.1≤Y≤0.9], and, when the piezoelectric film 30 is divided in half in a thickness direction, an atomic composition ratio X of lead on the first electrode side is set as X1 and an atomic composition ratio X of lead on the second electrode side is set as X2, a value of the ratio X1/X2 is preferably equal to or greater than 1.04 and more preferably equal to or greater than 1.11. This can further prevent lowering of the Schottky barrier height in association with use. Further, in terms of prevention of lowering of the Schottky barrier height. X2 is preferably equal to or less than 1.2, and a value of the ratio X1/X2 is preferably equal to or less than 1.14.” In the independent claim, the specific piezoelectric material composition that provides the stated results is not present and the specification does not provide for any other material compositions to obtain the same results. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited references disclose piezoelectric elements comprising a piezoelectric layer wherein the piezoelectric composition varies. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jaydi San Martin whose telephone number is (571)272-2018. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th 7:45-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached on 571-270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J. San Martin/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683577
PACKAGED ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICES WITH MULTI-LAYER PIEZOELECTRIC SUBSTRATE WITH SEAL RING SPACED FROM PIEZOELECTRIC LAYERS
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683581
Resonator Component, Resonator Device, And Method Of Manufacturing Resonator Component
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676588
COMPOSITE SUBSTRATE AND ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676590
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676595
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1027 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month