Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/558,908

INHIBITORS OF SARS-COV-2

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 03, 2023
Priority
May 04, 2021 — provisional 63/183,642 +2 more
Examiner
JACKSON, SHAWQUIA
Art Unit
1626
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The Texas A&M University System
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1430 granted / 1834 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1854
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1834 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-12, 19, 27, 34-37, 39 and 41 are currently pending in the instant application. Applicants have amended claims 1, 9, 12, 19, 27, 34, 35 and 37 in an amendment filed on April 27, 2026. Claims 1-6, 8-10 and 36 are rejected, claims 7, 11, 34, 37, 39 and 41 are objected and claims 12, 19, 27 and 35 are considered allowable in this Office Action. I. Response to Arguments/Remarks Applicants’ amendment, filed on April 27, 2026, has overcome all of the pending rejections and objections in the previous Office Action. All previous rejections and objections have been withdrawn. II. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on April 27, 2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. III. Rejection(s) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-10 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Weiwer, et al. (Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 1822-1826). The instant invention claims PNG media_image1.png 687 827 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 183 780 media_image2.png Greyscale The Weiwer, et al. reference teaches piperazine containing compounds such as PNG media_image3.png 149 359 media_image3.png Greyscale (See page 1825, table 4) wherein Ar1 and Ar2 are both unsubstituted phenyl; X is piperazine; Y is CO and R is oxazole substituted with methyl and a second substituent (i.e, -NO2). This species of compound anticipates the genus compound of the instant invention, wherein the genus structure and its definitions are stated above. Claims 1-6, 8-9 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Song, et al. (Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16 (2008) 4035-4051). The instant invention claims PNG media_image1.png 687 827 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 183 780 media_image2.png Greyscale The Song, et al. reference teaches piperazine containing compounds such as PNG media_image4.png 152 190 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 47 466 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 40 517 media_image6.png Greyscale (See page 4040, table 1) wherein Ar1 and Ar2 are both substituted phenyl with halogen(s); X is piperazine; Y is CO and R is cyclohexyl or cyclobutyl both unsubstituted. This species of compound anticipates the genus compound of the instant invention, wherein the genus structure and its definitions are stated above. Claims 1-6, 8-10 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kumar, et al. (European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 44 (2009) 1223-1229). The instant invention claims PNG media_image1.png 687 827 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 183 780 media_image2.png Greyscale The Kumar, et al. reference teaches piperazine containing compounds such as PNG media_image7.png 120 143 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 375 276 media_image8.png Greyscale (See page 1225, table 1) wherein Ar1 and Ar2 are both unsubstituted phenyl; X is piperazine; Y is SO2 and R is phenyl substituted or unsubstituted. This species of compound anticipates the genus compound of the instant invention, wherein the genus structure and its definitions are stated above. Claims 1-6, 8-10 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okada, et al. (WO 2011/148888 A1). The instant invention claims PNG media_image1.png 687 827 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 183 780 media_image2.png Greyscale The Okada, et al. reference teaches piperazine containing compounds such as PNG media_image9.png 151 253 media_image9.png Greyscale (See page 1225, table 1) wherein Ar1 and Ar2 are both substituted phenyl with F; X is piperazine; Y is CH2 and R is pyridine substituted with an alkoxycarbonyl. This species of compound anticipates the genus compound of the instant invention, wherein the genus structure and its definitions are stated above. Claims 1-6, 8-10 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rotta, et al. (European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 90 (2015) 436-447). The instant invention claims PNG media_image1.png 687 827 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 183 780 media_image2.png Greyscale The Rotta, et al. reference teaches piperazine containing compounds such as PNG media_image10.png 112 205 media_image10.png Greyscale (See page 1225, table 1) wherein Ar1 and Ar2 are both unsubstituted phenyl; X is piperazine; Y is SO2 and R is unsubstituted phenyl. This species of compound anticipates the genus compound of the instant invention, wherein the genus structure and its definitions are stated above. IV. Objections Dependent Claim Objections Dependent Claims 7, 11, 37, 39 and 41 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected based claim. To overcome this objection, Applicant should rewrite said claims in an independent form and include the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claim. Claim Objections Claim 34 ais objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 34 is missing a period at the end of the claim. Each claim begins with a capital letter and ends with a period (MPEP 608.01 (m)). Claim 34 has structures numbered 4-19 that are small and difficult to read. Applicants are suggested to make these structures larger to overcome the objection. Appropriate correction is required. V. Conclusion Applicant's submission of an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97(c) with the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p) on April 27, 2026 prompted the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 609.04(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shawquia Jackson whose telephone number is (571)272-9043. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 7AM-4PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Milligan can be reached on (571) 270-7674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /SHAWQUIA JACKSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 03, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 27, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747219
COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF INHIBITING BACTERIAL CHAPERONIN SYSTEMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735390
PYRYLIUM METHOD OF PREPARING PYRIMIDINE CYCLOHEXYL GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734152
SOLID STATE FORMS OF NIROGACESTAT SALTS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729194
COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715840
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AROMATIC NITRILE COMPOUND
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (-3.3%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1834 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month