Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/559,007

CONTROLLING TIME SYNCHRONISATION IN A WIRELESS NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 03, 2023
Examiner
LIN, KENNY S
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
587 granted / 847 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
870
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 847 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 3-8, 11-12, 14, 18-19, 21, 27-29, 35-38, 43-51, 53-64, 66-72 are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed on 11/3/2023 and 7/18/2024 are considered. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-4, 6, 8, 18-19, 27-29, 35-37, 43-46, 48-50, 53-55, 57-58, 62-63 and 66-72 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Prakash et al (Prakash), US 2020/0322908. Prakash is cited by the applicant in the IDS. As per claim 1, Prakash teaches the invention including a method for controlling time synchronization in a wireless network comprising a user equipment, UE, and a base station, the method, at the base station, comprising: Determining time synchronization requirement between the UE and the base station (pp. 0106-0108, 0110-0112, 0118-0120); Providing a time synchronization control message for controlling a time synchronization process between the UE and the base station based on the determined time synchronization requirements (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); and Sending the time synchronization control message to the UE (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122), Wherein the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC, and wherein the time synchronization control message includes type of the information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0111-0112, 0117-0120: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 3, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches wherein determining time synchronization requirements between the UE and the base station includes: Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is required (pp. 0068-0069, 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is not required (pp. 0077); or Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is required with propagation delay compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is required without propagation delay compensation (pp. 0068-0069, 0116). As per claim 4, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches wherein providing the time synchronization control message comprises: Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be deactivated in response providing the time synchronization control signal to deactivate the time synchronization process; or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be activated in response providing the time synchronization control signal to activate the time synchronization process (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be activated and propagation delay compensation is to be activated and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to activate the time synchronization process and propagation delay compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be activated without propagation delay compensation and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to activate the time synchronization process without propagation delay compensation (pp. 0068-0069); or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is active and is to be changed and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to change the time synchronization process. As per claim 6, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches the method to comprise: Receiving a message from a core network entity of the wireless network, Wherein sending the time synchronization control comprises sending the time synchronization control message after receipt of the message (pp. 0067-0068). As per claim 8, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches the method to comprise: Receiving a message from a core network entity of the wireless network, wherein the message includes information for indicating the time synchronization requirements between the UE and the base station, wherein determining time synchronization requirements comprise determining time synchronization requirements based on the received message (pp. 0067-0068, 0106-0108, 0110-0112, 0118-0120). As per claim 18, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches wherein the plurality of type of PDC includes Timing Advance, Round Trip Time, RTT, pre-compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 19, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches wherein the time synchronization control message includes information for activating or deactivating propagation delay compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 27, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash further teaches wherein the time synchronization control message is a MAC Control Element, MAC-CE, message or a RRC message (pp. 0082-0084, 0090, 0092-0093, 0098, 0102, 0122). As per claim 28, Prakash teaches the invention including a method for controlling time synchronization in a wireless network comprising a user equipment, UE, and a base station, the method, at the UE, comprising: Receiving, form the base station, a time synchronization control message (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); and Controlling a time synchronization process based on the received time synchronization control message (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122), Wherein the time synchronization control message includes information for controlling the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC, and wherein the time synchronization control message includes type of the information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0111-0112, 0117-0120: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 29, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 28. Prakash further teaches wherein controlling the time synchronization process comprises: Activating the time synchronization process at the UE (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Deactivating the time synchronization process at the UE; or Changing the time synchronization process at the UE by activating or deactivating propagation delay compensation. As per claim 35, Prakash teaches the invention including an apparatus for a user equipment, UE, for controlling time synchronization between the UE and a base station of a wireless network, the apparatus comprising: One or more processing units configured to: Receive, form the base station, a time synchronization control message (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); and Control a time synchronization process based on the received time synchronization control message (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122), Wherein the time synchronization control message includes information for controlling the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC, and wherein the time synchronization control message includes type of the information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0111-0112, 0117-0120: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 36, Prakash teaches the invention including an apparatus for a base station for controlling time synchronization between a user equipment, UE, and a base station of a wireless network, the apparatus comprising: One or more processing units configured to: Determine time synchronization requirement between the UE and the base station (pp. 0106-0108, 0110-0112, 0118-0120); Provide a time synchronization control message for controlling a time synchronization process between the UE and the base station based on the determined time synchronization requirements (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); and Send the time synchronization control message to the UE (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122), Wherein the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC, and wherein the time synchronization control message includes type of the information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0111-0112, 0117-0120: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 37, Prakash teaches the invention including a method comprising: Generating and sending a time synchronization control message for controlling time synchronization between a UE and a base station of a wireless network, the time synchronization control message comprising information for controlling the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC (pp. 0110-0115, 0117-0120, 0122: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC), Wherein the time synchronization control message includes a type information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0110-0115, 0117-0120, 0122: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 43, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 37. Prakash further teaches wherein the time synchronization control message is a MAC Control Element, MAC-CE, message or a RRC message (pp. 0082-0084, 0090, 0092-0093, 0098, 0102, 0122). As per claim 44, Prakash teaches the invention including a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by one or more processing unit of a base station of a wireless network, cause the one or more processing unit to: Determine time synchronization requirement between the UE and the base station (pp. 0106-0108, 0110-0112, 0118-0120); Provide a time synchronization control message for controlling a time synchronization process between the UE and the base station based on the determined time synchronization requirements (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); and Send the time synchronization control message to the UE (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122), Wherein the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC, and wherein the time synchronization control message includes type of the information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0111-0112, 0117-0120: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 45, Prakash teaches the invention including a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by one or more processing unit of a User Equipment, UE, of a wireless network, cause the one or more processing unit to: Receive, form a base station, a time synchronization control message (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); and Control a time synchronization process based on the received time synchronization control message (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122), Wherein the time synchronization control message includes information for controlling the time synchronization process with a particular type of propagation delay compensation, PDC, and wherein the time synchronization control message includes type of the information for indicating the particular type of PDC among a plurality of types of PDC for the time synchronization process (pp. 0111-0112, 0117-0120: RRT compensation sent in forms of TA, timing information, timing offset, timing difference, second TA granularity different than the first TA granularity, actual time difference between base station and UE represents different type of PDC). As per claim 46, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 28. Prakash further teaches wherein the controlling the time synchronization process comprises controlling the time synchronization process at the UE with the type of PDC indicated by the type information (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 48, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 28. Prakash further teaches wherein the plurality of type of PDC includes Timing Advance, Round Trip Time, RTT, pre-compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 49, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 35. Prakash further teaches wherein controlling the time synchronization process comprises: Activating the time synchronization process at the UE (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Deactivating the time synchronization process at the UE; or Changing the time synchronization process at the UE by activating or deactivating propagation delay compensation. As per claim 50, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 35. Prakash further teaches wherein the controlling the time synchronization process comprises controlling the time synchronization process at the UE with the type of PDC indicated by the type information (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 53, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 35. Prakash further teaches wherein the plurality of type of PDC includes Timing Advance, Round Trip Time, RTT, pre-compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 54, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 36. Prakash further teaches wherein the one or more processing units are configured to determine time synchronization requirements between the UE and the base station by: Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is required (pp. 0068-0069, 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is not required (pp. 0077); or Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is required with propagation delay compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining time synchronization between the UE and the base station is required without propagation delay compensation (pp. 0068-0069, 0116). As per claim 55, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 35. Prakash further teaches wherein the one or more processing units are configured to provide the time synchronization control message by: Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be deactivated in response providing the time synchronization control signal to deactivate the time synchronization process; or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be activated in response providing the time synchronization control signal to activate the time synchronization process (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be activated and propagation delay compensation is to be activated and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to activate the time synchronization process and propagation delay compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122); or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is to be activated without propagation delay compensation and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to activate the time synchronization process without propagation delay compensation (pp. 0068-0069); or Determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is active and is to be changed and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to change the time synchronization process. As per claim 57, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 36. Prakash further teaches the one or more processing units are further configured to: Receive a message from a core network entity of the wireless network, wherein the one or more processing units are configured to send the time synchronization control message by sending the time synchronization control message after the receipt of the message (pp. 0067-0068, 0106-0108, 0110-0112, 0118-0120). As per claim 58, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 36. Prakash further teaches the one or more processing units are further configured to: Receive a message from a core network entity of the wireless network, wherein the message includes information for indicating the time synchronization requirements between the UE and the base station, wherein the one or more processing units are configured to determine time synchronization requirements comprise determining time synchronization requirements based on the received message (pp. 0067-0068, 0106-0108, 0110-0112, 0118-0120). As per claim 62, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 36. Prakash further teaches wherein the plurality of type of PDC includes Timing Advance, Round Trip Time, RTT, pre-compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 63, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 63. Prakash further teaches wherein the time synchronization control message includes information for activating or deactivating propagation delay compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 66, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 36. Prakash further teaches wherein the time synchronization control message is a MAC Control Element, MAC-CE, message or a RRC message (pp. 0082-0084, 0090, 0092-0093, 0098, 0102, 0122). As per claim 67, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 37. Prakash further teaches wherein the plurality of type of PDC includes Timing Advance, Round Trip Time, RTT, pre-compensation (pp. 0112-0115, 0117-0120, 0122). As per claim 68-72, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claims 1, 28, 35-37. Prakash further teaches wherein the time synchronization control message includes a field for indicating the particular type of path delay compensation for the time synchronization process (pp. 0112-0115). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5, 7, 11-12, 21, 38, 47, 51, 56, 59, 64, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Prakash et al (Prakash), US 2020/0322908, in view of obviousness. As per claims 5 and 56, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claims 1 and 36. Prakash does not teach wherein providing the time synchronization control message comprises determining, based on the determined time synchronization requirements, when the time synchronization process is active and is to be changed and in response providing the time synchronization control signal to change the time synchronization process, wherein the time synchronization control signal includes information for activating or deactivating propagation delay compensation or when the propagation delay compensation is active, information for changing the type of propagation delay compensation. However, it is common practice and well known in the art to utilize a subsequent control message, following the previous control message, to update and change the previous instruction, which includes switching between activation and deactivation. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teaching of Prakash and further transmit subsequent synchronization control message to modify the previous commands in order to switch between propagation delay compensation activation and deactivation. As per claim 7, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 1. Prakash does not teach the method to further comprise: Receiving a message from a core network entity of the wireless network, wherein the message includes a duration time value corresponding to a duration time for which a time synchronization process is to be active; Wherein sending the time synchronization control message comprises sending a first time synchronization control message for activating the time synchronization process and on expiration of the duration time sending a second time synchronization control message for deactivating the time synchronization process. However, it is common practice and well known in the art to send time sensitive messages in associated with instructions that are to be performed within a scheduled time period in order to perform scheduled commands. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teachings of Prakash and transmit time duration information to instruct and schedule specific commands to start performing or ending based on a preferred performance interval. As per claims 11 and 59, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claims 8 and 58. Prakash further teaches to transmit the identity of the UE (pp. 0089, 0113, 0125) and propagation delay compensation information (pp. 0112-0115). Prakash does not teach wherein the message is a synchronization notification including information elements for indicating the time synchronization requirements between the UE and the base station, wherein the information elements includes a first information element indicating the identity of the UE to be configured, a second information element indicating whether the time synchronization process is to be active or inactive, and a third information element indicating whether propagation delay compensation is to be active or inactive. However, implementing a communication message with specific fields with specific information is well known and expected in the art. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teaching of Prakash and further implement the messages with multiple distinct fields designated for specific information for each corresponding field to be delivered to the receiving device for information access and retrieval. As per claim 12, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 6. Prakash does not teach wherein the message is a message associated with a Packet Data Unit, PDU, session between the UE and the base station. However, PDU communication is well known and expected in the art. Prakash provided motivation to utilize PDU session for communication (pp. 0052). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teaching of Prakash and further utilize various types of communication method, including PDU session communication, for transmitting messages between the network devices. As per claims 21, 38, 47, 51, 64, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claims 1, 28, and 35-37. Prakash does not teach wherein the time synchronization control message includes a first field for controlling the time synchronization process and a second field for indicating whether propagation delay compensation is to be active or inactive. However, implementing a communication message with specific fields with specific information is well known and expected in the art. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teaching of Prakash and further implement the control messages with multiple distinct fields designated for specific information for each corresponding field to be delivered to the receiving device for information access and retrieval. Claim(s) 14 and 60-61, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Prakash et al (Prakash), US 2020/0322908, in view of Moon et al (Moon), US 2021/0099341. As per claim 14, 61, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claims 1 and 36. Prakash further teaches the network to be a Time Sensitive Network, TSN (pp. 0067, 0069, 0124-0126) and the use of PDU session (pp. 0052). Prakash does not teach to further comprise detecting a Packet Data Unit, PDU, session for a time sensitive communication, TSC, for a Time Sensitive Network, TSN, application, wherein determining time synchronization requirement between the UE and the base station is based on time synchronization requirements of the detected PDU session for a TSC application. Moon teaches to establish a PDU session for a time sensitive communication, TSC, for a TSN, application, wherein determining time synchronization requirement between the UE and the base station is based on time synchronization requirements of the PDU session for a TSC application (pp. 0009-0023). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teachings of Prakash and Moon in order to utilize PDU session for time sensitive communication and transmit time synchronization requirements via the PDU session. As per claim 60, Prakash teaches the invention as claimed in claim 57. Prakash further teaches to utilize PDU session between the UE and the base station for communication (pp. 0052). Prakash does not teach wherein the message includes one or more of: Quality of Service, QoS, Information for indicating the QoS required for the PDU session; or Session identity information for indicating whether the PDU session is a PDU session for Time Sensitive Communication, TSC, for a Time Sensitive Network, TSN, application. Moon teaches wherein the message includes one or more of: Quality of Service, QoS, information for indicating the QoS required for the PDU session (pp. 0093, 0102); or Session identity information for indicating whether the PDU session is a PDU session for Time Sensitive Communication, TSC, for a Time Sensitive Network, TSN, application (pp. 0116: TSN logical bridge ID). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teachings of Prakash and Moon and include Quality of Service information and PDU session identification in the transmitted message to ensure the corresponding PDU session is meeting the required quality of service. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Larsson et al, US 2023/0134036 Xiong, EP4009549B1 Fu et al, EP4213416A1 Fu, EP4087335A1 Jacobsen et al, US 2022/0070808 Singh et al, TW202123728A Laselva et al, US 11,019,583 Fu, WO2021/056295A1 A shortened statutory period for reply to this Office action is set to expire Three MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNY S LIN whose telephone number is (571) 272-3968. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Noel Beharry can be reached on 571-270-5630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). KENNY S. LIN Examiner Art Unit 2416 /Kenny S Lin/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2416 December 11, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 03, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598485
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PLURALITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DOMAINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593371
NETWORK NODE APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING END-TO-END RELIABILITY AND IMPROVING FAULT TOLERANCE IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587221
Device for improving reception and method for improving reception
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587938
CELL HANDOVER METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588053
TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, PRIORITY DEFINITION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 847 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month