Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/559,311

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A FURNITURE OR CONSTRUCTION ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 06, 2023
Priority
May 12, 2021 — DE 10 2021 112 435.2 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, PAUL D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Homag GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1367 granted / 1559 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
1613
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1559 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The subject matter of this application admits of illustration by a drawing to facilitate understanding of the invention. Applicant is required to furnish a drawing under 37 CFR 1.81. No new matter may be introduced in the required drawing. Applicant is given a shortened statutory period of TWO (2) MONTHS to submit a drawing in compliance with 37 CFR 1.81. Extensions of time may be obtained under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a) but in no case can any extension carry the date for reply to this letter beyond the maximum period of SIX MONTHS set by statute (35 U.S.C. 133). Failure to timely submit a drawing will result in ABANDONMENT of the application. Claim Objections Claims 1-11 are objected to because of the following informalities: Re. claim 1: The phrase “plastic or the like,” as recited in line 4 appears to be --plastic or the like;--. The phrase “a portion of the surface of the workpiece, and” as recited in lines 5-6 appears to be --a portion of the surface of the workpiece; and--. The phrase “in that at least one electronic component” as recited in lines 9-10 appears to be --in that the at least one electronic component--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re. claim 1: The phrase “or the like” as recited in line 4 renders the claim vague and indefinite. It is unclear as to what the “or the like” is meant. Re. claims 4-6 and 11: The phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Heikkinen et al. Heikkinen et al. teach a process of making a structure comprising steps of: providing a workpiece (102, Fig.1, paragraph [0071]), which preferably consists at least in part of plastic; applying a coating material (11, 116, Fig. 1, paragraph [0071]) to at least a portion of the surface of the workpiece; and providing at least one electronic component (104, Fig. 1, paragraph [0072]) on the coating material characterized in that at least one electronic component is printed at least in part onto the coating material. Re. claim 2: The at least one electronic component has a single-layer or multi-layer structure (paragraphs [0071]-[0072]). Re. claim 3: The at least one electronic component comprises a display, in particular a light-emitting diode (LED), preferably an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) (paragraph [0076]). Re. claim 4: The at least one electronic component comprises a sensor (paragraph [0075]). Re. claim 5: The at least one electronic component comprises a transmitting and/or receiving unit (paragraph [0075]). Re. claim 6: The at least one electronic component comprises a transmitting and/or receiving unit (paragraph [0075]). Re. claim 7: The at least one electronic component comprises electrically conductive material (paragraphs [0072]-[0073]). Re. claim 9: The at least one electronic component is printed onto the coating material after the coating material has been applied at least in part to the workpiece (paragraph [0071]). Re. claim 10: The workpiece comprises a power supply and/or a data transmission interface that is/are connected to the at least one electronic component (paragraphs [0073]-[0074]). Re. claim 11: Since the scope of the claimed invention is a structure, not howe to use it. Therefore, the limitation as recited in claim 11 describes how to use the at least one electronic component of the structure. Accordingly, claim 11 appear to require the combination of the at least one electronic component of the structure and a machine, such as in particular a household appliance, and/or to a wireless network, such as in particular a WLAN router. It is noted that the claim can be drafted to recite the intended working environment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heikkinen et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Lynch (US PAT. 5,863,597). Heikkinen et al. teach all limitations as set forth above, but silent a protective layer for the at least one electronic component. Lynch teaches a process of making an electrical device including a process of forming a protective film on a printed circuit board in order to protect components against environmental stresses or foreign object damage (col. 1, lines 45-52). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify a process of fabricating a structure of Heikkinen et al. by forming a protective film on a printed circuit board as taught by Lynch in order to protect components against environmental stresses or foreign object damage. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL D KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707616
TAPE LOADING DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700782
Positioning Device and Method for Positioning Wire Ends in the Manufacture of an Electrical Machine
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700624
DISASSEMBLY MECHANISM, DISASSEMBLY SYSTEM FOR POWER BATTERY PACK WITH DISASSEMBLY MECHANISM AND DISASSEMBLY METHOD OF POWER BATTERY PACK
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700780
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING STATOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700539
VERTICALLY-STACKED INTERDIGITATED METAL-INSULATOR-METAL CAPACITOR FOR SUB-20 NM PITCH
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1559 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month