Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/559,426

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Priority
May 14, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021018501
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, MAHBUBUL BAR
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
256 granted / 308 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
338
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
87.4%
+47.4% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 308 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The following is a final office action in response to applicant’s reply, filed on 04/28/2026, to the Non-Final Office Action mailed on 01/28/2026. Claims 4, 8-9 are canceled. Claims 1-3, 5-7 are amended. Claim 10 is new. Claims 1-3, 5-7 and 10 are pending and addressed below. Applicant’s amendment to the claims has overcome rejection under USC 112(b) and claim interpretation under USC 112(f), previously set forth in the non-final office action. Applicant’s amendment to the specification has overcome objection to the Title previously set forth in the non-final office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1-2, 5, 6 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by TANG; Zhixun et al US 20210251040 A1, hereinafter TANG. Regarding claims 1, 5, 6 and 10, TANG teaches, A terminal comprising: a receiver that receives a first Medium Access Control Control Element (MAC CE) including information used for at least one of activation and deactivation of non-serving cells (“Non-serving cell” is interpreted as a neighboring cell that is to be activated/deactivated for the wireless communication connection – a secondary cell (SCell) is well-known in the art as being such a non-serving cell. TANG [0005] “ The method can include receiving on a primary cell (PCell) at a user equipment (UE) a first medium access (MAC) control element (CE) for activating a first secondary cell (SCell) and a second SCell for the UE in a wireless communication system., [0069] ” Accordingly, control signaling (e.g., MAC CEs) can be received on the PCell 110 for activating or deactivating one of the SCells 120a-120n.”), and a second MAC CE including information to indicate a synchronization signal/physical broadcast channel block (SSB) index of at least one non-serving cell of the non-serving cells that are active and indicated in the first MAC CE (TANG [0006] “ In an embodiment, the activating the first and second SCells in parallel includes receiving on the PCell a second MAC CE for indicating a first transmission configuration indication (TCI) state […], performing a time-frequency tracking process on the second SCell based on an SSB indicated in the first TCI state, […], [0062] “For example, a TCI state may be signaled to the UE 101 in a MAC CE (or a MAC CE activation command) to indicate an SSB (in form of an SSB index) for PDCCH or PDSCH reception.”, teaching a second MAC CE that includes TCI state comprising SSB index); and a processor that controls transmission/reception to/from the non-serving cell indicated in the second MAC CE (Implied in TANG. See also Fig. 2, [62] “When beamforming is employed and the TCI mechanism is utilized. […]). With respect to claim 5, claim recites the identical features of claim 1 for a corresponding method. Therefore, it is subjected to the same rejection. With respect to claim 6, claim recites the identical features of claim 1 for a corresponding inter-working base station of the transmitting side. Therefore, it is subjected to the same rejection. With respect to claim 10, claim recites the identical features of claim 1 for a corresponding system comprising the terminal and the base station. Therefore, it is subjected to the same rejection. Regarding claim 2, TANG teaches the terminal, as outlined in the rejection of claim 1. TANG further teaches, wherein the receiver receives a third MAC CE to indicate non-serving cells for which channel state information (CSI) reporting is activated and a fourth MAC CE to indicate a TCI state for at least one non-serving cell of non- serving cells indicated in the third MAC CE (The claim about using different MAC-CEs for activating CSI reporting and TCI state indication of the non-serving cell. TANG [6] “receiving a third MAC CE on the PCell for activating a semi-persistent (SP) channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) resource set of the second SCell, and performing a channel state information (CSI) reporting process based on the SP CSI-RS resource set activated by the third MAC CE on the second SCell.”, [11] “a fourth MAC CE for indicating a TCI state for receiving the other one of the PDCCH and the PDSCH of the SCell.”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim 3 and 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over TANG, in view of SUN; Haitong et al US 20230422165 A1, hereinafter SUN. Regarding claims 3 and 7, TANG teaches the terminal, as outlined in the rejection of claims 1 and 2. While implicitly teaching, performing CSI reporting for active SCells ( see e.g., TANG [0007]), TANG does not expressly teach, however, in the same field of endeavor, SUN teaches, wherein the processor performs CSI reporting for a non-serving cell being active out of the non-serving cells, and does not perform CSI reporting for a non-serving cell being inactive out of the non-serving cells (SUN [43], [45] “FIG. 6b shows a new MAC-CE 650 according to a second option. The second MAC-CE 650 includes a five bit SCell index field and a six bit CSI request field for each activated SCell. The SCell index indicates the SCell that is to be activated and the CSI request indicates the AP-TRS that is to be triggered.”, teaches CSI reporting is performed only for the activated SCell). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of SHIMODA to include the features as taught by SUN above in order to provide SCell activation enhancement with assistance reference signal (SUN [0001]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 04/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues in Remarks: page 13 “Thus, while it may be said that Tang discloses multiple MAC CEs, Tang is also silent regarding a second MAC CE including information indicating the SSB index. Tang is also silent regarding a non-serving cell. That is, Tang fails to supply that which Shimoda lacks.”. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Tang discloses a second MAC CE indicating TCI that comprises SSB-index, as cited in the U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection above. Furthermore, non-serving cell is equivalent to SCell in TANG and also well-known in the technology. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. LIN; Hsuan-Li US 20210111851 A1, SECONDARY CELL ACTIVATION IN NEW RADIO SYSTEM. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHBUBUL BAR CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-0232. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 9AM-5PM EST; Friday variable. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khaled Kassim can be reached on 571-270-3770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAHBUBUL BAR CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684606
TRANSMISSION REPETITION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671558
CODE BLOCK GROUP BASED CROSS-BANDWIDTH PART SCHEDULING
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659895
SYNCHRONIZATION REFERENCE SOURCE SELECTION FOR CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659085
HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST PROCESS NUMBER DETERMINATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659861
DISCONTINUOUS TRANSMISSION DETECTION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 308 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month