Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/559,428

FLOATING STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING FLOATING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Examiner
POLAY, ANDREW
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
654 granted / 881 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
923
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 881 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Jahnig (US 20130019792 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Jahnig discloses a floating structure, comprising: a floating body including one or more buoyant bodies disposed around a structure; a plurality of first support wires disposed between the structure and the floating body and configured to transmit a self-weight of the structure to the floating body; and a plurality of second support wires connected to the structure above one end and configured to prevent the structure from falling over, each of the first support wires having: the one end connected to the floating body; and another end connected to the structure below the one end, wherein the one or more buoyant bodies include at least a first buoyant body and a second buoyant body, the floating body has a linking member linking and securing the first buoyant body and the second buoyant body, each of the plurality of second support wires has a proximal end and a distal end, each proximal end is connected to the linking member above the one end, and each distal end is connected to the structure above the one end. (See markup Fig. 2 below. Proximal end best seen in Fig. 3.) PNG media_image1.png 1037 1241 media_image1.png Greyscale Fig 2 of Jahnig Marked Up Regarding Claim 4, Jahnig discloses a floating structure according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of second support wires has a proximal end and a distal end, each proximal end is connected to the buoyant body above the one end, and each distal end is connected to the structure above the one end. (See markup Fig. 1.) Regarding Claim 7, Jahnig discloses a floating structure according to claim 1, wherein a height position of the distal end is higher than a height position of the proximal end. (See markup Fig. 1.) Regarding Claim 8, Jahnig discloses a floating structure according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of second support wires are tensioned. (paragraph 21) Regarding Claim 10, Jahnig discloses a floating structure according to claim 1, further comprising: an annular member surrounding the structure and attached to the floating body so that the annular member is in non-contact with the structure. (Interrior members of linking members, best seen Fig 3.) Regarding Claim 11, Jahnig discloses a floating structure according to claim 1, wherein the structure is a column of an offshore structure. (See Fig. 2.) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jahnig in view of Saito (JP 2013141857 A, provided by Applicant ). Regarding Claim 6, Jahnig discloses a floating structure according to claim 1, but does not explicitly disclose wherein a height position of the distal end is substantially the same as a height position of the proximal end. Saito discloses where additional second support wires are horizontal (See Fig. 5) It would have been obvious at the time of filing for a person of ordinary skill in the marine art to add additional second support wires to Jahnig such that wherein a height position of the distal end is substantially the same as a height position of the proximal end which can be accomplished with a reasonable expectation of success. The motivation to modify Jahnig is to provide additional lateral bracing. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 12 allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Loth (WO 2025188350 A1) discloses a tensioned floating body with a later filing date. Morishi (US 12085057 B2) disclose cable supported floating bodies. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW POLAY whose telephone number is (408)918-9746. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joe Morano can be reached at 5712726684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW POLAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615 21 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589833
VENTILATION DRUG REDUCTION DEVICE AND MARINE VENTILATION DRUG REDUCTION SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589847
BIOMIMETIC AQUATIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589848
Hydrogen Transport Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582886
SWIM TRAINING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565294
ADJUSTABLE ELECTRONICS MOUNTING PLATFORM AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 881 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month