Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/559,572

ZERO-POWER-CONSUMPTION SELF-ADAPTIVE DISTRIBUTED WASTE HEAT RECOVERY AND UTILIZATION SYSTEM FOR ETHYLENE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Examiner
SAVANI, AVINASH A
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BEIJING AEROSPACE ENERGY CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
970 granted / 1305 resolved
+4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1337
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1305 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Broach [5820362], further in view of Engelberg et al [5876197]. With respect to claim 1, Broach discloses: A zero-power-consumption self-adaptive distributed waste heat recovery and utilization system for an ethylene device, comprising: a waste heat collection pipeline system (28, 30), a heat recovery device (38) arranged in groups, and a waste heat return pipeline system (34), wherein the waste heat collection pipeline system is configured to lead out a working medium having waste heat from a waste heat source (32) of the ethylene device and distribute the working medium to the waste heat recovery device [col 5, line 5-14], the waste heat recovery device are configured to heat combustion-supporting air of a bottom burner of an ethylene cracking furnace through the waste heat [col 5, line 15-22], and the waste heat return pipeline system is configured to transport the working medium that has undergone waste heat recovery and utilization back to the waste heat source [col 5, line 26-39]. Broach however does not show a plurality of heat recovery devices or the flow control as further claimed. Although Ethylene is not specifically disclosed, the limitation is not given patentable weight as it is not a positively recited element with regard to structure in an apparatus claim; the limitation refers to intended use in an apparatus claim (see MPEP 2111.02). Engelberg makes up for these deficiencies by teaching: {cl. 1, cont’d} A plurality of waste heat recovery devices arranged in groups [col 5, line 9-30, with reference to “The exhaust gas flows into common exhaust gas conduit 18. A ventilator 8 is provided for the combustion air 7 and a ventilator 8r is provided for the extraction of the exhaust gas.”], and the waste heat collection pipeline system (8) is provided with flow control elements (11) in stages, and flow rates in pipelines are distributed differentially through the flow control elements to allow flow rates in the groups of waste heat recovery devices to be distributed evenly [see FIG 1, col 5, line 31-67]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the apparatus of Broach with the teachings of Engelberg because Engelberg provides a plurality of heat recovery devices with flow control to efficiently and evenly heat the apparatus for optimal heat transfer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 2, narrowing the overall scope, requires a vast number of components not found in the prior art in an obvious combination. The remaining dependent claims contain allowable subject matter because of claim dependency. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AVINASH A SAVANI whose telephone number is (571)270-3762. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 8am-4pm.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Hoang can be reached at 571-272-6460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AVINASH A SAVANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762 1/15/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601477
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A FUEL-OXIDIZER MIXTURE FOR A PREMIX GAS BURNER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601478
COMBUSTION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593938
PORTABLE COOKING STATION WITH INDEPENDENTLY ADJUSTABLE LEG HEIGHT, SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595773
Combustion Apparatus with Mass Flow Sensor
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588781
COMBINATION FIRE PIT, GRILL, PIZZA OVEN AND COOKING WOK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+20.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1305 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month