Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/559,768

MULTI-PARTY BLOCKCHAIN ADDRESS SCHEME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 08, 2023
Examiner
IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O
Art Unit
2494
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NCHAIN LICENSING AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
452 granted / 636 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
662
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-14 and 19-21 are allowed. Claim Objections Claims 10 and 11, and claims 14 and 21 appear to be duplicates. Correction required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 15-16 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Trock, publication number: US 2023/0291561. As per claims 1 and 18, Trock a computer-implemented method of generating a blockchain transaction, the transaction being for transferring an amount of a digital asset from a first party to one of a plurality of second parties, wherein each second party is associated with a respective public key and each respective public key is associated with a respective index, and wherein the method is performed by a coordinating party (blockchain transactions including key and a token linked to an address, [0040-0041]) and comprises: generating a first blockchain transaction, wherein the first blockchain transaction comprises a first locking script comprising a plurality of sub-scripts, each sub-script being associated with a respective one of the indexes and comprising a respective expected hash value of the respective public key associated with the respective index associated with that sub-script, and wherein the first locking script is configured to, when executed together with a first unlocking script of a second blockchain transaction (blockchain transaction with multiple locking scripts [0052], expected preimage, [0060]), a) require the first unlocking script to comprise a target index, a target public key, and a target signature (blockchain transaction including an address, [0041], public key, [0062] and signature [0062]), and b) execute the sub-script associated with the target index, wherein when executed each sub-script is configured to i) generate a hash of the target public key and require the generated hash value to match the respective expected hash value included in that sub-script (matching hashes [0059-0060]), and ii) verify that the target signature is a valid signature for the target public key (verifying signature, [0062]); and making the first blockchain transaction available to at least one of: one or more nodes of a blockchain network, the first party, one of more of the plurality of second parties, and one or more third parties (allowing token movement, [0041]). As per claim 2, Trock teaches wherein each sub-script comprises a hash puzzle for the respective public key associated with that sub-script (Hash puzzle, [0023]). As per claim 3, Trock teaches wherein each sub-script comprises a pay-to-public-key-hash script configured to perform i) and ii) (P2PKH, [0041][0085]) As per claim 4, Trock teaches comprising: obtaining one or more of the respective public keys; and generating the respective expected hash value of the one or more respective public keys (expected hash, [0059-0060]). As per claims 5 and 16, Trock teaches wherein said obtaining of the one or more respective public keys comprises receiving the one or more respective public keys from one or more of the second parties (Public key, [0062]). As per claim 6, Trock teaches wherein each of the one or more respective public keys is received from the second party associated with that public key (Public key, [0062]). As per claim 7, Trock teaches comprising receiving the respective expected hash value of one or more of the respective public keys (Preimage, [0060]). As per claim 8, Trock teaches wherein the coordinating party is one of the plurality of second parties (verifying, [0060]). As per claim 9, Trock teaches wherein the coordinating party is the first party (verifying, [0060]). As per claim 15, Trock teaches a computer-implemented method of generating a blockchain transaction, the transaction being for unlocking an amount of a digital asset locked to one of a plurality of second parties, wherein each second party is associated with a respective public key and each respective public key is associated with a respective index, wherein a first blockchain transaction comprises a first locking script comprising a plurality of sub-scripts, each sub-script being associated with a respective one of the indexes and comprising a respective expected hash value of the respective public key associated with the respective index associated with that sub-script, and wherein the first locking script is configured to, when executed together with a first unlocking script of a second blockchain transaction (blockchain transactions including key and a token linked to an address, [0040-0041], blockchain transaction with multiple locking scripts [0052], expected preimage, [0060]), a) require the first unlocking script to comprise a target index, a target public key, and a target signature (blockchain transaction including an address, [0041], public key, [0062] and signature [0062]), and b) execute the sub-script associated with the target index, wherein when executed each sub-script is configured to i) generate a hash of the target public key and require the generated hash value to match the respective expected hash value included in that sub-script (matching hashes [0059-0060]), and ii) verify that the target signature is a valid signature for the target public key; and wherein the method is performed by a target one of the second parties (verifying signature, [0062]) and comprises: generating the second blockchain transaction, wherein the second blockchain transaction comprises an input that references the first locking script of the first blockchain transaction and the first unlocking script, the first unlocking script comprising the respective public key associated with the target second party, a respective index associated with the respective public key, and a valid signature for the respective public key associated with the target second party (unlocking script, [0032], hash preimage, [0044][0060]); and making the second blockchain transaction available to at least one of: one or more nodes of a blockchain network, the first party, one of more of the plurality of second parties, and one or more third parties (allowing token movement, [0041]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLUGBENGA O IDOWU whose telephone number is (571)270-1450. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jung Kim can be reached at 5712723804. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLUGBENGA O IDOWU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2494
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591707
Privacy Preserving Insights and Distillation of Large Language Model Backed Experiences
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587397
MULTI DIMENSION BLOCKCHAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585753
VALIDATED MOVEMENT OF SHARED IHS HARDWARE COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562912
APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) PROVISIONING USING DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556416
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ATOMIC, CONSISTENT AND ACCOUNTABLE CROSS-CHAIN REWRITING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+19.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month