Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/559,802

AMPLIFIER CIRCUIT AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Examiner
LIENG, MALANE
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allow Rate
22 granted / 23 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
43
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 23 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by UEDA (WO 2008044276 A1)(cited by the applicant), hereafter referred to as “Ueda”. Regarding claims 1 and 14, 15, in the embodiment of Fig. 5, Ueda discloses: An amplifier circuit and power amplifier (Fig. 5, power amplifying device, as per claim 14) comprising: an input terminal (RF input side); an output terminal (RF output); one or a plurality of transistors (amplification transistor 107) provided on a path that couples the input terminal and the output terminal (as shown in Fig. 5); an amplitude detection circuit (average processing unit 103 and peak detection unit 104) configured to detect a signal amplitude of an input signal at the input terminal (paragraph [0025]-[0026], 103 and 104 detects average power or peak power (i.e. the signal amplitude)); and an impedance circuit (amplifier control unit 109) configured to change an impedance and set operating conditions of the one or the plurality of transistors on a basis of a detection result of the amplitude detection circuit (paragraph [0026], amplifier control unit 109 adjusts the amplification factor of the variable gain amplifier 105 and the power supply voltage of the transistor 107 based on the input average power and peak power (i.e. 103 and 104)). Regarding claim 4, in the embodiment of Figs. 5 and 6, Ueda discloses: the impedance circuit includes a varactor (variable capacitor C110, [0033] formed by a parallel capacitor and a varactor diode), and is configured to change the impedance by causing a capacitance value in the varactor to vary on the basis of the detection result (paragraph [0033], Fig. 5 load impedance can be varied by changing the capacitance of C110 in Fig. 6). Regarding claim 13, in the embodiment of Fig. 5, Ueda discloses: the one or the plurality of transistors includes a final-stage transistor (amplifier transistor 107 is part of the output of the amplifier as per paragraph [0029]) including a drain (107 drain), the amplifier circuit includes a second matching circuit (output matching circuit 108) that is provided on a path coupling the drain of the final-stage transistor and the output terminal and is configured to change an impedance, and the impedance circuit includes the second matching circuit (paragraph [0022], output matching circuit 108 includes an impedance variable circuit and has a function of changing the load impedance based on a control signal from the amplifier control unit 109). Claims 1, 4-6, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harris et al. (US 8855584 B2), hereafter referred to as “Harris”. Regarding claims 1 and 14, 15, in the embodiment of Figs. 7 and 9, Harris discloses: An amplifier circuit and power amplifier (Figs. 7 and 9, transmission circuitry as per claim 14) comprising: an input terminal (RF input signal, RFin); an output terminal (RF output signal, RFout); one or a plurality of transistors (power amplifier circuitry 24, transistors form the power amplifier circuitry 24 as per column 17 lines 65-66) provided on a path that couples the input terminal and the output terminal (as shown in Figs. 7 and 9); an amplitude detection circuit (processing circuitry 32) configured to detect a signal amplitude of an input signal at the input terminal (column 10, lines 24-33, the processing circuitry 32 may also dynamically monitor the RF input signal RFIN to detect amplitude, or phase of the RFIN.) (detected average power or peak power (i.e. the signal amplitude)); and an impedance circuit (impedance control circuitry 30) configured to change an impedance and set operating conditions of the one or the plurality of transistors on a basis of a detection result of the amplitude detection circuit (column 9 lines 52-63, As RF input signal and conditions change, power amplifier circuitry 24 impedance can change and the impedance control circuitry 30 dynamically adjusts variable impedance elements). Regarding claims 4-6, in the embodiment of Figs. 7 and 9, Ueda discloses: the impedance circuit includes a varactor, a plurality of capacitors (Figs. 7 and 9, varactors V1-V6 , shown to be controlled by impedance control circuitry 30 and consist a plurality of capacitors, as per claim 5), and a plurality of inductors (Fig. 9, inductors L1 and L2, per claim 6) and is configured to change the impedance by causing a capacitance value in the varactor to vary on the basis of the detection result (column 14 lines 27-35, impedance control signals set the varactors capacitance values, and variable impedance network include inductors (e.g. L1) per column 9 lines 10-20). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 and 7-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2: the cited prior art of record, UEDA and Harris et al., either singly or in proper combination, does not teach or make obvious, along with the other claimed features, “the amplitude detection circuit includes a separation device that separates an alternating-current signal from the input signal, and is configured to detect the signal amplitude of the input signal by detecting a signal amplitude of the alternating-current signal.” Regarding claim 7: the cited prior art of record, UEDA and Harris et al., either singly or in proper combination, does not teach or make obvious, along with the other claimed features, “a first transistor and a second transistor, the first transistor includes a drain and a gate led to the input terminal, and the second transistor includes a gate, a drain led to the output terminal, and a source led to the drain of the first transistor.” Claims 3, and 8-12 are objected to as being dependent on objected claims 2 and 7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALANE LIENG whose telephone number is (571)272-5739. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:30 - 4:00 CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MALANE LIENG/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603620
Class-D Amplifier
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592670
EFFICIENT COMMON MODE SUPPRESSION FOR TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587149
STABILITY IN POWER AMPLIFIERS UNDER HIGH IN-BAND VOLTAGE STANDING WAVE RATIO CONDITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587143
POWER AMPLIFIER STABILITY ENHANCEMENT AT EXTREME CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587146
POWER AMPLIFIER DEVICES WITH IN-PACKAGE MATCHING CIRCUITS THAT PROVIDE PSEUDO INVERSE CLASS F OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 23 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month