Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/559,816

A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A ROLLING OR PLAIN BEARING RING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Priority
Jun 02, 2021 — DE 102021205643.1 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, THIEN S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Aktiebolaget SKF
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
983 granted / 1370 resolved
+11.8% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1406
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1370 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Gegner (US 2020/0166080) in view of Dong (CN109868469). An English machine translation of Dong (CN109868469) is included with the Notice of Reference Cited (PTO-892). With respect to the limitations of claim 1, Gegner teaches a method for manufacturing a rolling or plain bearing ring (Fig 1, bearing inner ring 2, base body 5, 0054), the method comprising the steps of: providing a metallic ring member (ring 2, base body 5); and applying a load carrying surface (metallic coating, cladding 6, 0007, 0054, 0056) onto the metallic ring member (2, 5) by use of a deposition process (0012, 0013, deposition welding) where the load carrying surface comprises carbon (0026, 0.25 to 1.3 carbon) and boron (0026, 0 to 0.1 boron). Gegner discloses the claimed invention except for the load carrying surface is applied by use of a steel wire Directed Energy Deposition (DED) operation and/or a steel metal powder DED operation, wherein the steel wire and/or the steel metal powder comprises 0.10-0.50 wt % of carbon and 0.50-1.20 wt % of boron. However, Dong discloses the load carrying surface is applied by use of a steel wire Directed Energy Deposition (DED) operation and/or a steel metal powder DED operation (Abstract, 0012, powder material for laser manufacturing of a composite lining plate; 0016, use a semiconductor fiber laser to spread powder while performing laser cladding), the steel wire and/or the steel metal powder comprises 0.10-0.50 wt % of carbon (0016, C: 0.1-0.2%) and 0.50-1.20 wt % of boron (0016, B: 0.2-0.7%) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the method for manufacturing a rolling or plain bearing ring having load carrying surface applied by a deposition process of Gegner silent to the type of deposition with the load carrying surface is applied by use of a steel wire Directed Energy Deposition (DED) operation and/or a steel metal powder DED operation, wherein the steel wire and/or the steel metal powder comprises 0.10-0.50 wt % of carbon and 0.50-1.20 wt % of boron of Dong for the purpose of using a known Directed Energy Deposition that provides a cladding layer with high hardness but also strong impact resistance, thereby improving the deformation resistance of the cladding layer during use (0022, 0023). With respect to the limitations of claims 2, 4, 5 and 8, Gegner in view of Dong discloses the steel wire and/or steel metal powder comprises carbon and boron (Dong, 0016, C: 0.1-0.2%, B: 0.2-0.7%) as hardening mechanisms (0023); the steel wire is a stainless steel wire and/or the steel metal powder is a stainless steel metal powder (0030, Cr: 15%, Fe: balance); the step of applying the load carrying surface includes applying more than one layer by use of DED (Dong, Abstract, 0012, powder material for laser manufacturing of a composite lining plate; 0016, use a semiconductor fiber laser to spread powder while performing laser cladding); a final radial thickness of the applied load carrying surface is 0.25 mm-10 mm (single-layer cladding thickness: 2 mm). With respect to the limitations of claim 10, Gegner in view of Dong discloses a rolling or plain bearing ring for a rolling or plain bearing (Gegner, Fig 1, bearing inner ring 2, base body 5, 0054), the rolling or plain bearing ring has been manufactured by the method according claim 1 (as set forth in the rejection of claim 1 above). Claims 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Gegner (US 2020/0166080) in view of Dong (CN109868469) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Wu (CN113862667). An English machine translation of Wu (CN113862667) is included with the Notice of Reference Cited (PTO-892). With respect to the limitations of claims 6 and 7, Gegner in view of Dong discloses the claimed invention except for during the step of applying a load carrying surface, an application speed is varied during application of the steel wire material and/or the steel metal powder on the metallic ring member; the application speed is varied by decreasing the speed at least one time during the step of applying the load carrying surface. However, Wu discloses during the step of applying a load carrying surface, an application speed is varied during application (0021, after passing through the first-stage adjustment mechanism, some powder flow rate slows down and falls freely through the second powder outlet) of the steel wire material and/or the steel metal powder on the metallic ring member; the application speed is varied by decreasing the speed at least one time during the step of applying (0021, after passing through the first-stage adjustment mechanism, some powder flow rate slows down and falls freely through the second powder outlet) the load carrying surface is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the method for manufacturing a rolling or plain bearing ring having load carrying surface applied by a laser powder deposition process of Gegner in view of Dong silent to the application speed with the during the step of applying a load carrying surface, an application speed is varied during application of the steel wire material and/or the steel metal powder on the metallic ring member; the application speed is varied by decreasing the speed at least one time during the step of applying the load carrying surface of Wu for the purpose of allowing the powder material to fall almost freely and spread evenly on the substrate surface, resulting in uniform powder spread (0021). Claims 9 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Gegner (US 2020/0166080) in view of Dong (CN109868469) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Huo (CN109706449). An English machine translation of Huo (CN109706449) is included with the Notice of Reference Cited (PTO-892). With respect to the limitations of claim 9, Gegner in view of Dong discloses the claimed invention except for further comprising a step of: prior to the step of applying the load carrying surface, removing an existing load carrying surface of the metallic ring member. However, Huo discloses further comprising a step of: prior to the step of applying the load carrying surface (0018, 0019, laser cladding), removing an existing load carrying surface of the metallic ring member (0013-0015, grind away fatigue layer, 0014) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the method for manufacturing a rolling or plain bearing ring having load carrying surface applied by a deposition process silent to removing of an existing load carrying surface with the further comprising a step of: prior to the step of applying the load carrying surface, removing an existing load carrying surface of the metallic ring member of Huo for the purpose of providing a known removal step that allows existing ring members to be repaired or reworked to extend the life of the ring member (0032). With respect to the limitations of claim 12, Gegner in view of Dong and Huo discloses the claimed invention except for the step of removing an existing load carrying surface includes removing a radial thickness of a material of the metallic ring member, the radial thickness having a value of 0.25 mm-10 mm. However, it would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to have the step of removing an existing load carrying surface includes removing a radial thickness of a material of the metallic ring member, the radial thickness having a value of 0.25 mm-10 mm, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable radial thickness removal value ranges involves only routine skill in the art (see MPEP 2144.04). Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Gegner (US 2020/0166080) in view of Dong (CN109868469) as applied to claims 1 and 5, further in view of Zhang (CN109402631). An English machine translation of Zhang (CN109402631) is included with the Notice of Reference Cited (PTO-892). With respect to the limitations of claim 11, Gegner in view of Dong discloses the claimed invention except for the step of applying the load carrying surface includes applying 2-20 layers by use of DED. However, Zhang discloses the step of applying the load carrying surface includes applying 2-20 layers (Fig 1, layers 2-4, 0033) by use of DED (0038-0040) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the method for manufacturing a rolling or plain bearing ring having load carrying surface applied by a deposition process silent to multiple layers with the step of applying the load carrying surface includes applying 2-20 layers by use of DED of Zhang for the purpose of using a known multi-layered, laser, deposition configuration that secures a working layer to a workpiece. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THIEN S TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7745. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday [8:00-4:00]. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THIEN S TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761 7/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703286
PORTABLE COOKING APPARATUS
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697683
WELDING DEVICE FOR BUTTON-TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696357
AEROGEL BLANKET INSULATOR AND ITS FUNCTIONAL COMPOSITE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696353
COUNTERTOP COOKING SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689139
GLASS PLATE MODULE
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+24.0%)
3y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1370 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month