Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/559,927

IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO ROAD BARRIERS AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Priority
Aug 20, 2021 — AU 2021218191 +1 more
Examiner
HARTMANN, GARY S
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Valmont Highway International Pty Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
928 granted / 1278 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1304
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1278 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13, 14, 16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 continues to recite positioning relative to an unclaimed component. This claim continues to not be treated on the merits. Claim 14 also recites arrangement with respect to a feature (aperture) in an unclaimed component (plastic road barrier). This claim has not been further treated on the merits. Claim 16 also recites a process (“upon engagement…”) with respect to an unclaimed component. And, as discussed in the previous Office action, the recitation of “do not contact a ground or other support surface” is indefinite because, given the structure of parent claim 12, there is no configuration for which this phrase positively points out and distinctly claims the invention. Any land-based structure must either be supported by the ground or an “other” support surface. This claim provides no structure which enables this lack of support configuration. Claim 16 has not been further treated on the merits. Claim 17 continues to recite a range (33%) relative to an unclaimed component (terminal barrier section). This claim has not been further treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kang (U.S. Patent 6,905,281). Kang discloses an impact extension carriage frame assembly for use with at least one road barrier. There is a top plate (36), side frames (15) and cross member (any/all of 12, 31, 34 and fasteners which connect components, for example, see Figure 6). There is a transverse cutting member (21) connecting the side frames (by 39b, for example, Figure 6, for example). Because the member (15) is positioned such that it cuts through members (40) along the length of the barrier, it is deemed to meet the recitation of “at a downstream end.” Given the distance illustrated in the present specification, no further patentable weight may be given to this phrase. Regarding claim 21, there are a plurality of hollow barrier sections (33, Figure 4, for example). A hollow section could naturally be filled with water. Regarding the connectors, Kange includes both linear (39a, for example) and non-linear (13) connectors (Figure 6, for example). These broadly meet claim recitations, since there is no finished structure in this kit claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 18 is allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 29 June 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. While applicant has added the plastic road barrier as intended use in claim 12, this is still an unclaimed feature. The manner in which components are arranged with respect to this unclaimed feature continues to be indefinite. The claim must either positively recite the barrier or the dependent claims be sufficiently well defined structurally to positively point out and distinctly claim the structure in absence of this barrier(s). Regarding the cutting member, web (21) meets this recitation, since it cuts through members (40). The broad recitation of “transverse” is met because it is transverse to at least the width of the assembly. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY S HARTMANN whose telephone number is (571)272-6989. The examiner can normally be reached 11-7:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Sebesta can be reached at 571 272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GARY S. HARTMANN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3671 /GARY S HARTMANN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jun 29, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735848
GROUND PROCESSING ROLLER
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729494
ULTRA-SHALLOW BOLLARD ASSEMBLY
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729495
SAFE ZONE POST ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723418
PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLE CONFIGURED TO PERFORM ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723358
SOCKET ASSEMBLED ARCH RIB, MANUFACTURING AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD THEREOF, AND ARCH BRIDGE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.9%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1278 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month