Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/560,382

MAGNETIC ATTRACTION INCUBATION MECHANISM OF AUTOMATIC MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 11, 2023
Priority
May 13, 2021 — CN 202110522360.8 +2 more
Examiner
MUTREJA, JYOTI NAGPAUL
Art Unit
1798
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Autobio Labtec Instruments Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
751 granted / 926 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 926 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation In claim 1, without “configured to” or “programmed to” recited language between the control device and the claimed operation, the limitations “for driving the incubation assembly and the magnetic attraction assembly to alternately approach the reaction chamber” have been given their broadest reasonable interpretation and thus interpreted as an intended use of the control device. Although claims are interpreted in light of the specification, it is improper to import claim limitations from the specification (see MPEP 2111). The current claim limitations do not require the control device to actually operate in accordance with the recited functions. Thus, a prior art controller need only be capable of operating in the claimed manner (see MPEP 2114(IV)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-5 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jafari (US 2009/0068062). Regarding claim 1, Jafari teaches a system and method for multi-analyte detection comprising a magnetic attraction assembly (55) for magnetically attracting a reaction chamber containing a sample solution and an incubation assembly (57) for heating the reaction chamber, a driving device (650) for driving the incubation assembly (57) and the magnetic attraction assembly (55) to alternately approach the reaction chamber, wherein the magnetic attraction assembly (55) and the incubation assembly (57) are connected to the driving device (657). Regarding claim 3, the incubation assembly (57) comprises a heating block (560 and 561) having a reagent groove (57) inside, a heating device (560 and 561) for heating the heating block, a heat dissipation device (fan) for dissipating heat from the heating block, and a temperature sensor (570 and 572) for detecting a temperature of the heating block and the heating device (560 and 561) contacts an inner wall of the reagent groove (57), the heat dissipation device (fan) is arranged at a bottom of the heating block, the temperature sensor (570 and 572) is connected to the heating block and the reagent groove is configured to accommodate the reaction chamber (RV). (Refer to Figure 36) Regarding claim 4, the heating block has at least eight reagent grooves. (Refer to Figure 36) Regarding claim 5, the heating device is a PI electric heating film, and heating power of the PI electric heating film is distributed non-uniformly on the inner wall. (Refer to paragraph [0307]) Regarding claim 13, wherein the driving device (660) is a lead screw driving mechanism. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 6-12 and 14-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Jafari fails to teach a support assembly, wherein the driving device and the magnetic attraction assembly are connected to the support assembly, and the support assembly is provided with a rail for limiting a lateral movement trajectory of the magnetic attraction assembly; and the magnetic attraction assembly is configured to move away from the reaction chamber along the rail when the driving device drives the incubation assembly to rise, and approach the reaction chamber along the rail when the driving device drives the incubation assembly to descend. Jafari fails to teach wherein the magnetic attraction assembly comprises a magnet and a rotating device for driving the magnet to rotate circumferentially, the magnet has a first magnetic attraction surface and a second magnetic attraction surface circumferentially, the first magnetic attraction surface and the second magnetic attraction surface have different areas for attracting magnetic beads in a sample liquid, and the rotating device is connected to the magnet. Jafari fails to teach the support assembly comprises a horizontal plate and a vertical plate, the horizontal plate is perpendicular to the vertical plate, the rail is arranged on the horizontal plate, the magnetic attraction assembly is connected to a slider on the rail, a synchronous pulley is provided on a top of the vertical plate, a synchronous belt is wound around an outer peripheral portion of the synchronous belt pulley, one end of the synchronous belt is vertically connected to the magnetic attraction assembly, the other end of the synchronous belt is arranged along the vertical plate, a blocking piece is provided on the synchronous belt, and a telescopic end of the driving device is provided with a power piece for abutting against the blocking piece. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JYOTI NAGPAUL whose telephone number is (571)272-1273. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Capozzi can be reached at 571-270-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JYOTI Mutreja/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1798
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678842
METHOD FOR DEGRADATION OF A PLASTIC-CONTAINING WASTE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669469
BLOTTER PAD FOR ELECTROPHORESIS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669416
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MANIPULATING BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES
8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663344
SMEAR APPARATUS, SAMPLE LOADING MECHANISM AND METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12644803
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTING A PART OF A MICROSCOPIC SAMPLE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+3.8%)
2y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 926 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month