Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/560,844

HANDLING COLLISION WITH SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL BLOCK RECEPTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 14, 2023
Examiner
HO, CHUONG T
Art Unit
2412
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
940 granted / 1025 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1053
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
71.5%
+31.5% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/14/2023, 03/13/2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. This office action is in response to the Preliminary amendment filed 11/14/2023. Claims 1-8, 9-17, 18-21, 22-25 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2-5, 7, 18, 19-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WANG ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) in view of Li et al. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703). Regarding to the claim 1, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) teaches wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission (PUCCH) overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission (PUSCH) , and wherein the first uplink transmission (PUCCH) and the second uplink transmission (PUSCH) have a same priority index value (same priority ) ; resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission (skipping the transmission of a PUSCH ) (wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission, and wherein the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission have a same priority index value; resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission ) (resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission by transmitting the higher priority uplink transmission ) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186] [see the Provisional Application 63138206, pages 32-33 & pages 28-33]. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703), from the same or similar fields of endeavor, teaches identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission (dynamically scheduled UL transmission) or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission (semi-statistically UL transmission ) (identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission ) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0157 & 0158 & 0159 & 0063 & 0114 ]; resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first reception and the second transmission (resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0157 & 0158 & 0063 & 0114 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 2, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) and ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teach the limitations of the claim 1 above. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 3, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 4, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 5, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 further teach when resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission, are to multiplex the second uplink transmission and the first uplink transmission in the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission (when resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission, are to multiplex the second uplink transmission and the first uplink transmission in the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 7, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 further teach when resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission, are to cancel the first uplink transmission (when resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission, are to cancel the first uplink transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 18, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) teaches wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission (PUCCH) overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission (PUSCH) , and wherein the first uplink transmission (PUCCH) and the second uplink transmission (PUSCH) have a same priority index value (same priority ) ; resolving an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission (skipping the transmission of a PUSCH ) (wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission, and wherein the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission have a same priority index value; resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission ) (resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission by transmitting the higher priority uplink transmission ) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186] [see the Provisional Application 63138206, pages 32-33 & pages 28-33]. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach identifying that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703), from the same or similar fields of endeavor, teaches identifying that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission (dynamically scheduled UL transmission) or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission (semi-statistically UL transmission ) (identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission ) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0157 & 0158 & 0159 & 0063 & 0114 ]; resolving an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first reception and the second transmission (resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0157 & 0158 & 0063 & 0114 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 19, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) and ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teach the limitations of the claim 1 above. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 20, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 further teach when resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission, are to multiplex the second uplink transmission and the first uplink transmission in the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission (when resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission, are to multiplex the second uplink transmission and the first uplink transmission in the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 21, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 further teach wherein resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission comprises canceling the first uplink transmission (wherein resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission comprises canceling the first uplink transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Claim(s) 9, 10-15, 22, 23-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WANG ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) in view of Li et al. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) . Regarding to the claim 9, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 teaches wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission (PUCCH) overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission (PUSCH) , wherein a priority index value of the second uplink transmission is lower than a priority index value of the first uplink transmission; resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission (skipping the transmission of a PUSCH ) (wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission, wherein a priority index value of the second uplink transmission is lower than a priority index value of the first uplink transmission , resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186]. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication, comprising: a memory; and one or more processors, coupled to the memory, configured to: identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission (dynamically scheduled UL transmission) or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission (semi-statistically UL transmission ), resolving an overlap between the second uplink transmission and the reception of the SSB (identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission , resolving an overlap between the second uplink transmission and the reception of the SSB ) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0063 & 0114 ]; resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission (resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0063 & 0114 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 10, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) and ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teach the limitations of the claim 1 above. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 11, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 12, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186 ]. Regarding to the claim 13, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) and ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teach the limitations of the claim 9 above. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) , from the same or similar fields of endeavor, teaches wherein the first uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission) [see Paragraph 0155] . Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 14, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 14, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 15, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) further teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission and the second uplink transmission is a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission) [see Paragraph 0115]. Regarding to the claim 22, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 teaches wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission (PUCCH) overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission (PUSCH) , wherein a priority index value of the second uplink transmission is lower than a priority index value of the first uplink transmission; resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission (skipping the transmission of a PUSCH ) (wherein the set of resources to be used for the first uplink transmission overlaps the set of resources to be used for the second uplink transmission, wherein a priority index value of the second uplink transmission is lower than a priority index value of the first uplink transmission , resolve an overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186]. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication, comprising: a memory; and one or more processors, coupled to the memory, configured to: identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission (dynamically scheduled UL transmission) or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission (semi-statistically UL transmission ), resolving an overlap between the second uplink transmission and the reception of the SSB (identify that a set of resources to be used for reception of a synchronization signal block (SSB) overlaps at least one of a set of resources to be used for a first uplink transmission or a set of resources to be used for a second uplink transmission , resolving an overlap between the second uplink transmission and the reception of the SSB ) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0063 & 0114 ]; resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission (resolve an overlap associated with the reception of the SSB after resolving the overlap between the first uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0155 & 0063 & 0114 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 23, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) and ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teach the limitations of the claim 1 above. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Regarding to the claim 24, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) and ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teach the limitations of the claim 1 above. However, ( US 20240306154, Provisional Application No. 63138206 ) does not explicitly teach wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission. ( US 20240155603, Provisional Application No. 63171462, Provisional Application No. 63186703) teaches wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission (wherein the first uplink transmission is a dynamically scheduled uplink transmission and the second uplink transmission is a semi-statically configured uplink transmission) [see Paragraphs 0115 & 0186 ]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing data of the claimed invention to modify the system of US 20240306154 in view of US 20240155603 because US 20240155603 suggests that as the demand for radio access continues to increase, there exists a need for further improvements in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art fails to disclose when resolving the overlap associated with the reception of the SSB, are to cancel the reception of the SSB. Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art fails to disclose when resolving the overlap associated with the reception of the SSB, are to: attempt the reception of the SSB. Claims 16, 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art fails to disclose when resolving the overlap between the second uplink transmission and the reception of the SSB, are to cancel the reception of the SSB. Claim 25 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art fails to disclose wherein resolving the overlap between the second uplink transmission and the reception of the SSB comprises canceling the reception of the SSB. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHUONG T HO whose telephone number is (571)272-3133. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles C Jiang can be reached at 571-270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHUONG T HO/Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604341
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXCHANGING FRAMES USING SECONDARY CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598654
HANDLING OF MBS SESSION RELATED BACK-OFF TIMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598629
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR EXCHANGING CONFIGURATION INFORMATION REGARDING A MRB IN A MR-DC SCENARIO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581538
ACCESS METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UNLICENSED CHANNEL, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574151
HARQ AND LINK ADAPTATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month