Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/561,190

WIRELESS POWER FEEDING SYSTEM AND METHOD AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 02, 2023
Examiner
BAXTER, BRIAN K
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tokyo Institute Of Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
376 granted / 485 resolved
+9.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 485 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 15 November 2023, 26 February 2025, 23 April 2025, and 31 October 2025 were filed on and after the mailing date of this present application. These submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-6, 9-13, and 16-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claims 1, 20, and 21, the limitation “substantially equal to one another” recited on lines 24, 25, and 24 respectively is unclear. “substantially equal to one another” is unclear because it is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. This term is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Regarding Claims 3, 6, 10, and 13, the limitation “substantially coaxially with one another” recited on lines 3, 4, 3-4, and 4, respectively is unclear. “substantially coaxially with one another” is unclear because it is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. This term is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Regarding Claims 5 and 12, the limitation “substantially parallel to the coil axis of the power transmission coil” recited on lines 3 and 3, respectively, is unclear. “substantially parallel to the coil axis of the power transmission coil” is unclear because it is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. This term is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Regarding Claim 12, the limitation “substantially a same amount of power” recited on line 1 is unclear. “substantially a same amount of power” is unclear because it is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. This term is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Regarding Claims 2-6, 9-13, and 16-19, they depend from Claim 1 and are also rejected for the reasons stated above. Allowable Subject Matter Regarding Claims 1, 20, and 21, Mita (US 20130015699) teaches a wireless power feeding system that transmits and receives power using magnetism, the wireless power feeding system (power supply system 4, fig. 1) comprising: a power transmission device (power supply apparatus 1, fig. 1) that includes a power transmission-side resonance circuit including a power transmission coil (repeater coil L3, fig. 1) and at least one power feeding coil (power transfer coil L1, fig. 1) that is provided to be capable of magnetic field coupling to the power transmission coil and transmits power to be fed from its input end to the power transmission coil using a magnetic field resonance method (The power supply system 4 is a system (contactless power supply system) that transfers power (supplies power) using magnetic fields (using magnetic resonance or the like; same below), refer to [0032]); a power reception device (electric vehicle 2, fig. 1) that includes a power reception-side resonance circuit including a power reception coil (power receiving coil L2, fig. 1) and feeds power received by the power reception coil to a load (battery 23, fig. 1). Mita is however silent regarding an impedance matching mechanism that performs impedance matching processing by changing a coupling strength in magnetic field coupling between the power feeding coil and the power transmission coil with inductance values of the power feeding coil substantially equal to one another depending on a variation of a load-side impedance as an impedance of a circuit on a load side from the input end of the power transmission device to alleviate a difference between the load-side impedance and an input-side impedance as an impedance of a circuit on a power supply device side from the input end of the power transmission device. Claims 1-6, 9-13, and 16-21 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding Claims 1, 20, and 21, the prior arts of record, taken alone or in combination, do not teach or fairly suggest a wireless power feeding system that transmits and receives power using magnetism, the wireless power feeding system comprising: a power transmission device that includes a power transmission-side resonance circuit including a power transmission coil and at least one power feeding coil that is provided to be capable of magnetic field coupling to the power transmission coil and transmits power to be fed from its input end to the power transmission coil using a magnetic field resonance method; a power reception device that includes a power reception- side resonance circuit including a power reception coil and feeds power received by the power reception coil to a load; and an impedance matching mechanism that performs impedance matching processing by changing a coupling strength in magnetic field coupling between the power feeding coil and the power transmission coil with inductance values of the power feeding coil substantially equal to one another depending on a variation of a load-side impedance as an impedance of a circuit on a load side from the input end of the power transmission device to alleviate a difference between the load-side impedance and an input-side impedance as an impedance of a circuit on a power supply device side from the input end of the power transmission device. Regarding Claims 2-6, 9-13, and 16-19, the depend from Claim 1 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN K BAXTER whose telephone number is (571)270-0258. The examiner can normally be reached 10-7:00 PM Monday-Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford N Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN K BAXTER/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 6 January 2026 /DANIEL CAVALLARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595932
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POWERING WATER HEATING DEVICES USING WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587025
ELECTRICAL COUPLING CIRCUIT AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580428
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571637
BATTERY PRE-COOLING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570164
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FIELD ADJUSTMENT IN WIRELESS CHARGING PADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 485 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month