Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/561,569

TREATMENT MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 16, 2023
Examiner
DEAK, LESLIE R
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Broad Bean Science Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
693 granted / 924 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
967
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 22-41 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2020/0238253 to Yonezawa et al. In the specification and figures, Yonezawa et al discloses the methods substantially as claimed by Applicant. With regard to claims 22 and 33, Yonezawa discloses that it is known that dialysis treatment alone is insufficient to reduce blood phosphorous concentration, and that the disclosed treatment module may be used to reduce phosphorous concentration in the blood, suggesting that the instantly disclosed treatment module may be used in combination with dialysis (see ¶0002, 0018). Yonezawa further discloses that blood is fed through the disclosed adsorbent treatment module 7 via inlet 1a and outlet 2a (see FIG, ¶0044). The adsorber may comprise a water-insoluble carrier with adsorbents bound thereto via a linker, and are selected from a amino groups, carboxyl groups, phosphate groups, phosphono groups, phosphino groups, and thiol groups (see ¶0009-10). Accordingly, Yonezowa suggests the method as claimed by Applicant. With regard to claims 23-24, Yonezawa (as evidenced by Yamada1) suggests that the method is known in the art. Furthermore, the use of a known product for a new use does not necessarily render the new use patentably distinct from the prior art, unless a new and unexpected result is produced (see MPEP §2112, 2112.02 (II)). The instant Specification does not provide evidence of unexpected results. Nonetheless, the treatment disclosed by Yonezawa (see ¶002, 0018) is capable of causing a decrease in calciproteins, alleviating both calciphylaxis (calcium buildup in blood vessels), as well as reducing phosphorous levels to prevent cerebrovascular accident (stroke, brain hemorrhage, as evidenced by Yamada, who teaches that high phosphorous levels are a risk factor for brain hemhorrage). With regard to claims 25-28, 34-37, Yonezawa discloses that the linker group may comprise one or more hydrocarbon groups, as well as a substituent alkyl group (see ¶0025). With regard to claims 29-31, 38-40, Yonezawa discloses that the treatment material may comprise 2 or more phosphonate groups bound to the linker group (see ¶0013), a porous water-insoluble carrier (see ¶0015) and a water-insoluble carrier has an exclusion limit molecular weight of 1,000 or more and 10,000,000 or less (see ¶0037). With regard to claims 32 and 41, Yonezawa discloses that the adsorbent compound may comprise pamidronic acid, alendronic acid and neridronic acid (see ¶0041). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2024/0241140 Kuroo Methods of adsorbing calciproteins Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESLIE R DEAK whose telephone number is (571)272-4943. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sarah Al-Hashimi can be reached at 571-272-7159. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LESLIE R DEAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799 2 March 2026 1 See Yamada S, Tsuruya K, Taniguchi M, Tokumoto M, Fujisaki K, Hirakata H, Fujimi S, Kitazono T. Association Between Serum Phosphate Levels and Stroke Risk in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: The Q-Cohort Study. Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2189-96.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 16, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599497
IMPLANTS WITH CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY FEATURES AND METHODS OF USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594186
AQUEOUS HUMOR DRAINAGE DEVICE WITH ADJUSTABLE TUBE DIAMETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575972
GLAUCOMA STENT AND METHODS THEREOF FOR GLAUCOMA TREATMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569604
METHOD AND DEVICES FOR DETERMINING A TIME POINT FOR MEASURING PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569654
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF FLUID OVERLOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+18.0%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month