Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/562,211

Single-Pick-Multiple-Print Micro LED Mass Transfer with Elastomer Stamp

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 17, 2023
Priority
May 27, 2021 — provisional 63/194,102 +1 more
Examiner
ABRAHAM, JOSE K
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
312 granted / 375 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
405
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 375 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 17 November 2023 was filed prior to the mailing date of this office correspondence. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 11, the limitation, “picking up both the first array of micro devices from the substrate with the first array of first transfer heads and the second array of micro devices from the base substrate with the second array of second transfer heads” (emphasis added) renders claim indefinite because it is unclear which substrate the limitation intended to. See, claim recites “a donor substrate” and “a base substrate”. Further, “picking up both…and the second array of micro devices from the base substrate” is confusing. Lines 4-5 deemed to read as, the first and the second transfer heads are supported by the base substrate. Therefore, it is unclear how picking up...second array of micro devices from the base substrate. As best understood, it appears that the limitation actually intends that “picking up both the first array of micro devices and the second array of micro devices from the donor substrate with the first array of first transfer heads and the second array of second transfer heads respectively.”, or the like. Claims 12-21 depend on claim 11. Therefore, claims 11-21 are rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang (US 20210351231). [AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (base substrate)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (second transfer head)][AltContent: textbox (first transfer head)][AltContent: ] PNG media_image1.png 618 597 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figs. 31 and 32, Zhang. Regarding claim 1, Zhang teaches, a conformable transfer device comprising: a base substrate (substrate 211, see annotated Fig. 31); and a first array of first transfer heads (second transfer heads 225, Fig. 31, the second transfer heads 225 connected with the second temporary substrate 211, para. [0104]) supported by the base substrate, and a second array of second transfer heads (first transfer heads 212, first transfer heads 212 formed on the second temporary substrate 211, para. [0095]) supported by the base substrate; wherein each first transfer head includes a first terminal contact surface extended a first orthogonal distance from the base substrate (the second LED chips 220 to be transferred are adhered to the second temporary substrate 211 via the second transfer heads 225, para. [0105]), and each second transfer head includes a second terminal contact surface extended a second orthogonal distance from the base substrate (first LED chips 210 are adhered to the first transfer heads 212, and the first transfer heads 212 correspond to the first LED chips 210 in position and number, para. [0096]), wherein the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance (H3>H2>H1, see Figs. 25, 30 and 31, para. [0113]). Regarding claim 2, Zhang teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 1. Zhang further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 1, wherein: each first transfer head includes a first contact mesa (see Figs. 30 to 32), and the first terminal contact surface is on the first contact mesa; and each second transfer head includes a second contact mesa, and the second terminal contact surface is on the second contact mesa (see annotated Fig. 32 below). Regarding claim 3, Zhang teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 2. Zhang further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 2, wherein the first contact mesa and the second contact mesa are formed of a same material (first transfer heads 212 are formed by photosensitive resin solidified after exposure and development, para. [0096], a remaining part of the second photosensitive resin layer 223 serves as second transfer heads 225 para. [0103]). Regarding claim 4, Zhang teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 3. Zhang further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 3, wherein the same material comprises a polymer (photosensitive resin, para. [0096]). Regarding claim 11, Zhang teaches, a micro-transfer printing method (see Figs. 21 and 27 to 33) comprising: aligning a conformable transfer device over a donor substrate (step S21, Fig. 21); wherein the conformable transfer device includes: a first array of first transfer heads supported by a base substrate (second transfer heads 225, Fig. 31, the second transfer heads 225 connected with the second temporary substrate 211, para. [0104]), and a second array of second transfer heads supported by the base substrate (first transfer heads 212, first transfer heads 212 formed on the second temporary substrate 211, para. [0095]); wherein each first transfer head includes a first terminal contact surface extended a first orthogonal distance from the base substrate (para. [0105]), and each second transfer head includes a second terminal contact surface extended a second orthogonal distance from the base substrate (para. 0096]), wherein the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance (H3>H2>H1, see Figs. 25, 30 and 31, para. [0113]); contacting a first array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the first array of first transfer heads while contacting a second array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the second array of second transfer heads (Fig. 31); and picking up both the first array of micro devices from the substrate with the first array of first transfer heads and the second array of micro devices from the base substrate with the second array of second transfer heads (step S36, Figs. 31 and 33, bosses of different heights can be disposed to place LED chips, so that the first LED chips 110, the second LED chips 120, and the third LED chips 130 can be picked up with transfer heads of different heights respectively, and then can be transferred to the display backplane 100 at one time, para. [0062, 0115]). Regarding claim 12, Zhang teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 11. Zhang further teaches, the micro-transfer printing method of claim 11, wherein contacting the first array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the first array of first transfer heads while contacting the second array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the second array of second transfer heads comprises compressing a first height of the first array of first transfer heads more than a second height of the second array of second transfer heads (H3>H2>H1, see Figs. 25, 30 and 31, para. [0113]). Regarding claim 13, Zhang teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 12. Zhang further teaches, the micro-transfer printing method of claim 12, further comprising placing the first array of micro devices on a receiving substrate prior to placing the second array of micro devices on the receiving substrate (three types of LED chips described in the present application are three colors (i.e., RGB) of LED chips according to actual applications, and their transfer sequence is not limited, para. [0117]). Claim(s) 1-6, 8-9 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cai (CN 215418184). Regarding claim 1, Cai teaches, a conformable transfer device comprising: a base substrate (substrate 1, see annotated Fig. 6-2 below); and PNG media_image2.png 200 535 media_image2.png Greyscale [AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (first transfer head)][AltContent: textbox (second transfer head)][AltContent: ] PNG media_image3.png 200 504 media_image3.png Greyscale Annotated Figs. 6-1 and 6-2 Cai. a first array of first transfer heads (a second protrusion 221, end face of the lower end of the second protrusion 221 is the second surface that is attached to the second chip to be transferred, para. [0060]) supported by the base substrate, and a second array of second transfer heads (first protrusions 212 , end face of the lower end of the first protrusion 212 is the first surface that is in contact with the first chip to be transferred, para. [0062]) supported by the base substrate; wherein each first transfer head includes a first terminal contact surface extended a first orthogonal distance from the base substrate (see Figs. 6-1 and 6-2]), and each second transfer head includes a second terminal contact surface extended a second orthogonal distance from the base substrate (Figs. 6-1 and 6-2), wherein the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance (see Fig. 6-2, picks up the corresponding first chip to be transferred 31, second chip to be transferred 32 and third chip to be transferred, the first distance between the lower end of the first pin of the first chip to be transferred 31 and the back surface of the substrate 1 is less than the second distance between the lower end of the second pin of the second chip to be transferred 32 and the back surface of the substrate 1, para. [0063]). Regarding claim 2, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 1. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 1, wherein: each first transfer head includes a first contact mesa (see annotated Fig. 6-2 below), and the first terminal contact surface is on the first contact mesa; and each second transfer head includes a second contact mesa, and the second terminal contact surface is on the second contact mesa (Fig. 6-2). [AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (second contact mesa)][AltContent: textbox (first contact mesa)] PNG media_image3.png 200 504 media_image3.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 6-2 Cai. Regarding claim 3, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 2. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 2, wherein the first contact mesa and the second contact mesa are formed of a same material (the pickup unit can include but not limited to PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane), para. [0076]). Regarding claim 4, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 3. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 3, wherein the same material comprises a polymer (PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane), para. [0076]). Regarding claim 5, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 4. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 4, wherein the polymer is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (the pickup unit can include but not limited to PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane), para. [0076]). Regarding claim 6, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 2. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 2, wherein: each first transfer head includes a first base mesa (see annotated 6-2 below), and the first contact mesa extends from a first extension surface of the first base mesa (see Fig. 6-2); and each second transfer head includes a second base mesa, and the second contact mesa extends from a second extension surface of the second base mesa. [AltContent: textbox (first base mesa)][AltContent: textbox (second base mesa)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image3.png 200 504 media_image3.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 6-2 Cai. Regarding claim 8, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 6. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 6, wherein the first base mesa has a first thickness in an orthogonal direction from the base substrate, and the second base mesa has a second thickness in the orthogonal direction (see Fig. 6-2). Regarding claim 9, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 6. Cai further teaches, the conformable transfer device of claim 6, wherein the first base mesa extends directly from the base substrate, and the second base mesa extends directly from the base substrate (see Fig. 6-2). Regarding claim 11, Cai teaches, a micro-transfer printing method (see Figs. 6-1 and 6-2) comprising: aligning a conformable transfer device over a donor substrate (temporary substrate, see Fig. 3); wherein the conformable transfer device includes: a first array of first transfer heads supported by a base substrate (a second protrusion 221, end face of the lower end of the second protrusion 221 is the second surface that is attached to the second chip to be transferred, para. [0060]), and a second array of second transfer heads supported by the base substrate (first protrusions 212 , end face of the lower end of the first protrusion 212 is the first surface that is in contact with the first chip to be transferred, para. [0062]); wherein each first transfer head includes a first terminal contact surface extended a first orthogonal distance from the base substrate (see Fig. 6-1), and each second transfer head includes a second terminal contact surface extended a second orthogonal distance from the base substrate (Fig. 6-1), wherein the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance (picks up the corresponding first chip to be transferred 31, second chip to be transferred 32 and third chip to be transferred, the first distance between the lower end of the first pin of the first chip to be transferred 31 and the back surface of the substrate 1 is less than the second distance between the lower end of the second pin of the second chip to be transferred 32 and the back surface of the substrate 1, para. [0063]); contacting a first array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the first array of first transfer heads while contacting a second array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the second array of second transfer heads (Fig. 6-2, para. [0063]); and picking up both the first array of micro devices from the substrate with the first array of first transfer heads and the second array of micro devices from the base substrate with the second array of second transfer heads (Fig. 6-2, para. [0063]). Regarding claim 12, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 11. Cai further teaches, the micro-transfer printing method of claim 11, wherein contacting the first array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the first array of first transfer heads while contacting the second array of micro devices on the donor substrate with the second array of second transfer heads comprises compressing a first height of the first array of first transfer heads more than a second height of the second array of second transfer heads (picks up the corresponding first chip to be transferred 31, second chip to be transferred 32 and third chip to be transferred, the first distance between the lower end of the first pin of the first chip to be transferred 31 and the back surface of the substrate 1 is less than the second distance between the lower end of the second pin of the second chip to be transferred 32 and the back surface of the substrate 1, para. [0063]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cai. Regarding claim 7, Cai teaches the recited limitations with respect to claim 1. Cai further teaches, in Fig. 5-1, in which, 7. The conformable transfer device of claim 6, wherein the first base mesa and the second base mesa have a same thickness (see Fig. 5-1, the end surfaces of the lower ends of the third protrusion 231 and the second protrusion 221 are in the same plane, para. [0060]). 10. The conformable transfer device of claim 6, further comprising a bulk layer (pickup unit layer 2, Fig. 6-1) on the base substrate (substrate 1), wherein the first base mesa and the second base mesa are integrally formed with the bulk layer and extend from the bulk layer ( the PDMS material can be a UV-curable silicone material, para. [0076]). Therefore, in view of the teachings of Fig. 5-1 of Cai, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the transfer device of Cai in Fig. 6-1 and to form the first base mesa 221 and the second base mesa 212 having same thickness as Cai disclosed in Fig. 5-1 so that it enables applying same pressure to the transfer chips as Cai disclosed in para. [0042]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 14 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims and to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 15-21 are allowable by virtue of its dependency. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for indicating allowable subject matter: Claim 14 would be allowable for disclosing a micro-transfer printing method, wherein placing the first array of micro devices on the receiving substrate comprises placing the first array of micro devices over a first array of landing pads, and placing the second array of micro devices on the receiving substrate comprises placing the second array of micro devices over a second array of landing pads; wherein an adhesive film spans over the first array of landing pads and the second array of landing pads; and wherein the second array of micro devices does not contact the adhesive film while placing the first array of micro devices on the receiving substrate. Though, prior art of record Zhang teaches, a temporary substrate with an adhesive film, and placing the first array of micro devices on the receiving substrate comprises placing the first array of micro devices over a first array of landing pads 242 in Fig. 33, and placing the second array of micro devices on the receiving substrate comprises placing the second array of micro devices over a second array of landing pads 241, Zhang fails to teach, the adhesive film spans over the first array of landing pads and the second array of landing pads; and wherein the second array of micro devices does not contact the adhesive film while placing the first array of micro devices on the receiving substrate. Prior art of record Cai teaches, a temporary substrate with adhesive bonding, Cai does not teach, the adhesive film spans over the first array of landing pads and the second array of landing pads; and wherein the second array of micro devices does not contact the adhesive film while placing the first array of micro devices on the receiving substrate. Therefore, claim 14 would be allowable. Claims 15-21 would be allowable by virtue of its dependency. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Prior art Katz (US 20210384051) teaches, a conformable transfer device comprising: a base substrate; and a first array of first transfer heads supported by the base substrate, and a second array of second transfer heads supported by the base substrate; wherein each first transfer head includes a first terminal contact surface extended a first orthogonal distance from the base substrate, and each second transfer head includes a second terminal contact surface extended a second orthogonal distance from the base substrate, wherein the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance. Prior art Hsiang (US 20190206714) teaches, a conformable transfer device comprising: a base substrate; and a first array of first transfer heads supported by the base substrate, and a second array of second transfer heads supported by the base substrate; wherein the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance. Prior art Ahn (US 20190189487) teaches, a conformable transfer device comprising: a base substrate; and a first array of first transfer heads supported by the base substrate, and a second array of second transfer heads supported by the base substrate; and the first orthogonal distance is greater than the second orthogonal distance. Prior art Gomez (Gomez D. et. al., Process Capability and Elastomer Stamp Lifetime in Micro Transfer Printing, 2016 IEEE 66th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2016) teaches a conformable transfer device comprising: a base substrate; and a first array of first transfer heads supported by the base substrate, and a second array of second transfer heads supported by the base substrate. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE K. ABRAHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-1087. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THOMAS J. HONG can be reached at (571) 272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE K ABRAHAM/Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749599
CABLE HARNESS MANUFACTURING SYSTEM AND A KIT OF PARTS AND TOOLING COMPONENTS FOR USE WITH AN ASSEMBLY BOARD IN CABLE HARNESS MANUFACTURING APPLICATIONS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738527
METHOD FOR FABRICATING SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING APPARATUS FOR SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738819
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A COIL WINDING AND WINDING FORMER
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738822
PERMANENT MAGNET RECOVERY DEVICE AND PERMANENT MAGNET RECOVERY METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738820
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLUGGED WAVE WINDING
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.9%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 375 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month