Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/562,358

METHOD FOR PRODUCING PHOSGENE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 20, 2023
Priority
May 27, 2021 — EU 21176199.4 +1 more
Examiner
BOYER, RANDY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
BASF SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
648 granted / 920 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
948
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 8, 9, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. With respect to claim 8, the claim recites the limitation “the amount of liquid temperature control medium.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. With respect to claim 9, the claim recites the limitation “the minimum amount of liquid temperature control medium.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. With respect to claim 12, the claim recites the limitation “the region of passage openings.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. With respect to claim 9, it is not at all clear what is meant by the limitation “nameplate operation,” and the claim is thus indefinite because the person having ordinary skill in the art would not be able to discern the intended scope of such limitation. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-14 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office Action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to claims 8-14, Examiner finds Olbert (US 2005/0118088) to be the closest relevant prior art reference. Olbert discloses a process for producing phosgene by gas phase reaction of carbon monoxide and chlorine in the presence of a catalyst in a shell-and-tube reactor comprising catalyst tubes surrounded by a reactor shell which accommodate the catalyst and around which a temperature control medium flows, and baffle plates arranged at right angles to the catalyst tubes in order to generate crossflow of the temperature control medium with respect to the catalyst tubes, the process comprising: (a) feeding a gas mixture comprising carbon monoxide and chlorine into the reactor such that the mixture enters the catalyst tubes at one end; (b) reacting the carbon monoxide with chlorine to produce phosgene product stream in the catalyst tubes; and (c) withdrawing the phosgene product from the reactor (see Olbert, Abstract; and paragraphs [0072]-[0102]). However, Olbert does not disclose or otherwise suggest wherein the amount of temperature control medium is sufficiently large that the temperature of the temperature control medium, in the event of failure of temperature control medium flow, reaches the normal boiling point of the temperature control medium no earlier than after 90 seconds. Thus, Examiner finds Applicant’s claims 8-14 patentable over the disclosure of Olbert. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Randy Boyer whose telephone number is (571) 272-7113. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 10:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. (EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Prem C. Singh, can be reached at (571) 272-6381. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Randy Boyer/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741260
SUPPORTED RISER APPARATUSES
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735549
TANDEM ALKANE METATHESIS AND CATALYZED DEPOLYMERIZATION FOR CHEMICALLY COMPLEX CIRCULAR FEEDSTOCK
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734496
Fluidizing Apparatus for the Treatment of Particulate Material
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728410
Zn-METAL OXIDE/ZEOLITE CATALYST AND METHODS OF MAKING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722020
PLASMA DEVICE FOR TREATING BODY SURFACES
5y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month