Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/562,832

DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §101§103
Filed
Nov 21, 2023
Priority
May 21, 2021 — CN 202110560544.3 +1 more
Examiner
BUKHARI, SIBTE H
Art Unit
2449
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
347 granted / 440 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
460
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 440 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This action is in response to application filed on 7/4/2026. Claims 1, 3-7, 9, 15, 17-21, 23 and 25 have been examined and are pending with this action. Claims 2, 8, 12-14, 16 , 22 and 26 are cancelled based on amendment filed on 7/4/2026. Examiner suggest Applicant to cancel claims 10-11 and 24. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 has been withdrawn based on amendment filed on 7/4/2026. Priority Examiner acknowledges that the Applicant claims a priority benefit of PCT/CN2022/092409 filed on 5/12/2022 which claims priority to Chinese Patent Application No. 202110560544.3, filed with China National Intellectual Property Administration on May 21, 2021. Drawings The drawings were received on 3/26/2019 and these drawings are accepted. Arguments Applicant arguments related to added limitations are not persuasive based on the following arguments. Applicant: Applicant argues that the limitation, wherein the measurement configuration information comprises a measurement category, and the measurement category comprises at least one or more of: an average packet delay, a packet loss rate, throughput, a data volume, or stuck times; the obtaining the measurement data of the target service according to the measurement configuration information specifically comprises: for a different measurement category, measuring the target service respectively, and obtaining the measurement data of the target service corresponding to the measurement category are not disclosed in the art provided. Examiner: Examiner cites that Wang discloses wherein the measurement configuration information comprises a measurement category, and the measurement category comprises at least one or more of: an average packet delay, a packet loss rate, throughput, a data volume, or stuck times (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “Based on the sidelink logical channel between the source and target pairs, or the sidelink bearer, or the service packet priority PPPP, or the service packet reliability PPPR, or the fifth generation mobile communication system service quality identification 5QI, the data volume data, volume, or throughput throughout, Or packet delay packet delay, packet loss rate packet loss rate, or packet discard rate measurement result information.”);; the obtaining the measurement data of the target service according to the measurement configuration (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “UE obtains sidelink drive test configuration information from a roadside unit or a relay node or a local management terminal or a group management terminal & The UE performs a sidelink communication drive test measurement, obtains the sidelink drive test information, and saves it.”) information specifically comprises: for a different measurement category, measuring the target service respectively, and obtaining the measurement data of the target service corresponding to the measurement category (Wang: [Embodiment 8]: “The base station obtains UE and PC5 QoS related parameters from the access mobility management function entity & the base station obtains UE related PC5 QoS related parameters from the access mobility management function entity, the method further includes: the base station receives a PC5 communication request / sidelink communication resource request sent by the terminal.”). Wang in general discloses a drive testing method and device and one of the embodiments it discloses the sidelink drive test configuration information includes at least one of a measurement item, a measurement object, and measurement-related parameters. In the citation provided above delay packet measurements are disclosed and in then UE obtains the test configuration (measurement’s) is disclosed. Based on the above explanation, applicants’ arguments are not persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7, 9, 15-21, 23 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (WO 2020063588 A1) in view of Zhou (CN 201911013198 A). INDEPENDENT: As per claim 1, Wang discloses a data processing method, applied to a terminal device (Wang: [Fig 2]: “receiving sidelink drive test configuration information from a centralized data processing center on the access network side.”), comprising: acquiring measurement configuration information and identification information of a target service (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 1]: the terminal obtains the sidelink drive test according to the sidelink drive test configuration information, the base station sends sidelink driving test configuration information, wherein in M8 the layer 2 measurements are indicated as measurement item QoS, see paragraphs 63 and 66; the measurement object in the measurement configuration comprises a to-be-measured service type which anticipates the identification information of the target service, see paragraph 67);; obtaining measurement data of the target service according to the measurement configuration information (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “UE obtains sidelink drive test configuration information from a roadside unit or a relay node or a local management terminal or a group management terminal & The UE performs a sidelink communication drive test measurement, obtains the sidelink drive test information, and saves it.”); and sending the measurement data to a network device (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “The UE reports the sidelink drive test information to the base station; according to the report configuration information in the sidelink drive test configuration information configured by the base station, when the sending period is reached or the report trigger condition is satisfied, the measurement result information of the required measurement item is reported.”). wherein the measurement configuration information comprises a measurement category, and the measurement category comprises at least one or more of: an average packet delay, a packet loss rate, throughput, a data volume, or stuck times (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “Based on the sidelink logical channel between the source and target pairs, or the sidelink bearer, or the service packet priority PPPP, or the service packet reliability PPPR, or the fifth generation mobile communication system service quality identification 5QI, the data volume data, volume, or throughput throughout, Or packet delay packet delay, packet loss rate packet loss rate, or packet discard rate measurement result information.”);; the obtaining the measurement data of the target service according to the measurement configuration (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “UE obtains sidelink drive test configuration information from a roadside unit or a relay node or a local management terminal or a group management terminal & The UE performs a sidelink communication drive test measurement, obtains the sidelink drive test information, and saves it.”) information specifically comprises: for a different measurement category, measuring the target service respectively, and obtaining the measurement data of the target service corresponding to the measurement category (Wang: [Embodiment 8]: “The base station obtains UE and PC5 QoS related parameters from the access mobility management function entity & the base station obtains UE related PC5 QoS related parameters from the access mobility management function entity, the method further includes: the base station receives a PC5 communication request / sidelink communication resource request sent by the terminal.”). Wang does not explicitly teach a layer-2 measurement. Zhou however discloses a layer-2 measurement. (Zhou: [Fig 4 Step 1]: “UE1 from the upper layer to obtain the application layer identification of a certain vehicle networking unicast service, and according to the service configuration information determining the unicast service corresponding to the default target layer two identification (default Layer-2 ID), and selecting itself corresponding to the unicast service of Layer-2 ID, the UE1 sends the SCI scrambled by the common SL-RNTI (Sidelink-RadioNetwork Temporary Identifier) through the PSCCH channel”); Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Wang in view of Zhou to figure out a layer-2 measurement. One would be motivated to do so because this ensures reduces the wireless link management and channel measurement work of the terminal and improve the communication efficiency of the whole vehicle network system. (Zhou: [ABS]). Claims 15 and 25 are rejected based on rationale provided for claim 1. DEPENDENTS: As per claim 3, Wang/Zhou discloses the data processing method according to claim 1, wherein the measurement configuration information comprises a measurement time, and the measurement time comprises a measurement period or a measurement time point (Wang: [Embodiment 1]: “he measurement related parameters in the sidelink drive test configuration information include: the channel busy rate CBR threshold used for sidelink resource pool congestion measurement, the delay threshold used for sidelink QoS measurement, the measurement period, and the measurement time interval.”); the obtaining the measurement data of the target service according to the measurement configuration information (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “UE obtains sidelink drive test configuration information from a roadside unit or a relay node or a local management terminal or a group management terminal & The UE performs a sidelink communication drive test measurement, obtains the sidelink drive test information, and saves it.”) specifically comprises: measuring the target service periodically according to the measurement period, and obtaining the measurement data of the target service acquired within the measurement period (Wang: [claim 3]: “wherein the measurement-related parameters include at least one of: a channel busy rate CBR threshold used for sidelink resource pool congestion measurement, a delay threshold used for sidelink QoS measurement, a measurement period, and a measurement time interval.”). As per claim 4, Wang/Zhou discloses the data processing method according to claim 1, wherein the data processing method further comprises storing the measurement data while the measurement data is obtained (Wang: [Embodiment 5]: “After receiving the sidelink log drive test configuration information, the UE performs local storage and processing. When the UE is in the idle state or the inactive state, the sidelink measurement is performed and the record is saved.”). As per claim 5, Wang/Zhou discloses the data processing method according to claim 4, wherein the storing the measurement data specifically comprises: determining whether the measurement data satisfies a preset condition (Wang: [Embodiment 5]: “when the configuration side needs to adjust the reporting condition of the sidelink drive test information according to the sidelink drive test configuration information, the sidelink drive test configuration information is set. It Also includes measurement report configuration conditions; when the generated sidelink drive test information meets the measurement report configuration conditions, the terminal will report the sidelink drive test information to the configuration side to complete the process of reporting the sidelink drive test infinformation. and storing the measurement data if it is determined that the preset condition is satisfied (Wang: [Embodiment 5]: “After receiving the sidelink log drive test configuration information, the UE performs local storage and processing. When the UE is in the idle state or the inactive state, the sidelink measurement is performed and the record is saved.”). As per claim 6, Wang/Zhou discloses the data processing method according to claim 1, wherein the measurement configuration information comprises a reporting time, and the reporting time comprises a reporting period or a reporting time point (Wang: [Fig 3: M1]: “the UE records the measurement result and reports the measurement result when the reporting period is reached or triggers the measurement result when the number or ratio of the CBR measurement value exceeds the CBR threshold value reaches the trigger reporting threshold value.”).; sending the measurement data to the network device specifically comprises: sending the measurement data to the network device periodically according to the reporting period (Wang: [Embodiment 4]: “When the UE has the reporting conditions (UE willingness or the UE meets the reporting conditions or the UE enters the connected state), the UE sends a sidelink drive test information record indication to the base station.”). As per claim 7, Wang/Zhou discloses the data processing method according to claim 1, wherein the sending the measurement data to the network device comprises: sending a measurement data reporting request to the network device (Wang: [Embodiment 4]: “When the UE has the reporting conditions (UE willingness or the UE meets the reporting conditions or the UE enters the connected state), the UE sends a sidelink drive test information record indication to the base station.”)., and sending the measurement data to the network device if a report-allow response information returned by the network device is received (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “The UE reports the sidelink drive test information to the base station; according to the report configuration information in the sidelink drive test configuration information configured by the base station, when the sending period is reached or the report trigger condition is satisfied, the measurement result information of the required measurement item is reported.”). As per claim 9, Wang/Zhou discloses the data processing method according to claim 1, wherein the data processing method (Wang: [Fig 2]: “receiving sidelink drive test configuration information from a centralized data processing center on the access network side.”), further comprises: sending reference information of the target service to the network device (Wang: [Fig 3 Step 2]: “The UE reports the sidelink drive test information to the base station; according to the report configuration information in the sidelink drive test configuration information configured by the base station, when the sending period is reached or the report trigger condition is satisfied, the measurement result information of the required measurement item is reported.”).; wherein the reference information comprises at least one or more of identification information of a cell where the terminal device is located, identification information of an adjacent cell of a cell where the terminal device is located, geographic location information of the terminal device, signal strength of a cell where the terminal device is located, signal strength of an adjacent cell of a cell where the terminal device is located, signal quality of a cell where the terminal device is located, or signal quality of an adjacent cell of a cell where the terminal device is located (Wang: [Fig 2]: “The measurement objects in the sidelink drive test configuration information include: the resource pool to be measured, the measurement execution zone (zone), the cell list of the measurement execution area, the SPS configuration index to be measured, the type of service to be measured, and the public land to be measured At least one of a list of mobile network PLMNs & The network can optimize the priority synchronization source type in the configuration or pre-configuration information in different cells, different geographic areas, and different time periods based on the synchronization source measurement information.”). Claims 15, 17-21 & 23 are rejected based on the rationale provided for claims 3-7 & 9. Conclusion This action is FINAL. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. This includes: Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sibte Bukhari whose telephone number is (571) 270-7122. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9:00 - 6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Srivastava can be reached on (571) 272-7304. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIBTE H BUKHARI/Examiner, Art Unit 2449
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §103
Jul 04, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750157
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744756
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR UE SERVICE MANAGEMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745123
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING OPERATIONAL TEMPERATURE OF BASE STATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745318
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739146
SOURCE AND RECEIVER ANCHORING FOR EFFICIENT MULTICAST TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.9%)
3y 1m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month