Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/563,907

FORCE SENSOR ASSEMBLY FOR ARTICULATED MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 23, 2023
Examiner
DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kinova INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
955 granted / 1121 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1165
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1121 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTIONAcknowledgment is made of applicant’s preliminary amendment filed 11/23/23. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the sentence “A hub is configured to be connected to a support a tool” is unclear. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: “Force sensor assembly for an articulated mechanism”. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 23 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 3, “a support a tool” is unclear. In claim 28, line 2, “the wrist device being to the tool” is unclear. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4, 6 – 11, 16, 19, 20 and 22 – 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Janik et al. (9,274,014, hereinafter Janik – See IDS dated 11/28/23). Regarding claim 1, Janik discloses a method and apparatus comprising an annular structure 56 configured for securing a force sensor assembly 52 to a link 40 of a mechanism, a hub 70 configured to be connected to a support 58, branches 78, 164 extending from the hub to the annular structure, the branches defining sensor receiving surfaces; and sensors 158 on the sensor receiving surfaces (See Figs. 1 and 4, Col. 4, lines 13 – 32 and 52 – 67, Col. 5, lines 1 – 43 and Col. 9, lines 3 – 24). Regarding claim 2, three branches are provided (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 4, the branches and the hub are generally axisymmetric (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 6, the branches are perpendicular to respective surfaces of the hub to which the branches connect (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 7, the branches are perpendicular to respective surfaces of the annular structure to which the branches connect (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 8, curved surfaces 76 are provided adjacent to flat surfaces 74 at junctions between the branches and the hub (See Col. 5, lines 44 – 49, See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 9, curved surfaces 76 are provided adjacent to flat surfaces 74 at junctions between the branches and the annular structure (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 10, the sensor receiving surfaces are flat (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 11, planes of the sensor receiving surfaces are perpendicular to planes of respective surfaces of the hub to which the branches connect (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 16, the hub defines a central opening (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 19, a printed circuit board 184 is connected to the sensors 158 (See Fig. 4, See Col. 9, lines 14 – 19). Regarding claim 20, at least one post 162 projects from the hub and the printed circuit board is connected to the at least one post (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 22, flexible circuits extend from the sensors to the printed circuit board (See Col. 9, lines 14 – 32). Regarding claim 23, at least one tool support member 54, 138 (See Figs. 3 and 4) is connected to the hub and is configured to interface a tool to the hub (See Col. 4, lines 62 – 67, Col. 5, lines 1 – 15 and Col. 7, lines 42 – 58). Regarding claim 24, the tool support member 138 has a plate body with an elongated shape, the plate body in planar engagement with a surface of the hub (See Fig. 3). Regarding claim 25, hub connection holes 66 in the tool support member 54 for connection with the hub are inward of tool connection holes 64 in the tool support member for connection with the tool (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 26, clocking features (pins) 122 are present between the tool support member 54 and the hub for providing a unique orientation engagement therebetween (See Fig. 6, See Col. 7, lines 15 – 40). Regarding claim 27, the tool support member 54 has a central opening in register with a central opening in the hub (See Fig. 4). Regarding claim 28, a robot arm (manipulator) 30 is provided that comprises a link having a motorized joint unit and a wrist device 138, the wrist device being the tool and the at least one link 40 being the mechanism (See Fig. 1, See Col. 3, lines 66 – 67, Col. 4, lines 2 – 32 and Col. 7, lines 42 – 57).98. Claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 16, 19 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bradford (2017/0205296 – See IDS dated 11/28/23). Regarding claim 1, Bradford discloses a method and apparatus comprising an annular structure 14 configured for securing a force sensor assembly 10 to a link of a mechanism; a hub 12 configured to be connected to a support, branches 16a – 16c extending from the hub to the annular structure, the branches defining sensor receiving surfaces; and sensors 1 – 6 on the sensor receiving surfaces (See Figs. 1 and 4F, See Pg. 2, Paras. 0025 – 0027 and Pg. 3, Paras. 0028 – 0029). Regarding claim 2, three branches are provided (See Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, the branches and the hub are generally axisymmetric (See Fig. 1). Regarding claim 6, the branches are perpendicular to respective surfaces of the hub to which the branches connect (See Fig. 1). Regarding claim 7, the branches are perpendicular to respective surfaces of the annular structure to which the branches connect (See Fig. 1). Regarding claim 10, the sensor receiving surfaces are flat (See Fig. 4F). Regarding claim 11, planes of the sensor receiving surfaces are perpendicular to planes of respective surfaces of the hub to which the branches connect (See Fig. 1). Regarding claim 14, the annular structure is polygonal (See Pg. 6, Para. 0058). Regarding claim 16, the hub defines a central opening (See Fig. 4F). Regarding claim 19, a printed circuit board 20 is connected to the sensors (See Fig. 6, See Pg. 4, Para. 0043). Regarding claim 22, flexible circuits extend from the sensors to the printed circuit board (See Fig. 6). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Xu et al. (11,650,113) disclose a torque sensor and strain beam structure of the same. Krippner et al. (8,726,741) disclose a set of multiaxial force and torque sensor and assembling method. Ichige (2006/0037409) discloses a rotary type component force measuring device. Sporer et al. (DE10304359) disclose a torque sensor for an electric motor.11. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2176. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at 5712724107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 11/14/25
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 23, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584808
TORQUE SENSOR ELEMENT AND TORQUE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571694
SENSOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A RELATIVE ANGULAR POSITION BETWEEN SHAFT HALVES OF A ROTARY SHAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553699
INSPECTION METHOD, MANUFACTURING METHOD AND INSPECTION SYSTEM OF DISK DRIVE SUSPENSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12553783
MAGNETOELASTIC TORQUE SENSOR WITH EXTENDED COMPENSATION FOR INTERFERENCE FIELDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551978
METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION OF A MOLDING TOOL DEVICE AS WELL AS RESHAPING APPARATUS AND COMPOSITE SHEET METAL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+1.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month