Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/563,999

A RECYCLED-CARBON-FIBER TOW COMPOSITION AND A METHOD FOR PRODUCING THEREOF

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 24, 2023
Priority
May 28, 2021 — JP 2021-090412 +1 more
Examiner
THOMPSON, CAMIE S
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fuji Design Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
967 granted / 1319 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1319 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s amendment and accompanying remarks filed November 19, 2025 are acknowledged. Examiner acknowledges amended claims 1-2 and 4. The rejection of claims 1-6 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sugino et al., JP 2018-202810 in view of Kageyama et al., JP 2014-196584 is overcome by Applicant’s amendment and withdrawn due Applicant’s argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sugino et al., JP 2018-202810 in view of Sugiura, JP4216409 Regarding claims 1 and 3, Sugino discloses a recycled carbon fiber bundle extracted from a carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting resin molding [0001] wherein the recycled carbon fiber bundle can be used as a raw material for CFRP [carbon fiber reinforced plastic - sheet] [0010]. Paragraph 0011 discloses that carbon fibers are bundled into a tow shape with an amorphous carbon precursor derived from a thermosetting resin [0020 and 0022]. Paragraph 0058 discloses that the matrix resin is converted [no resin residue] into an amorphous carbon precursor Paragraph 0035 discloses that the recycled carbon fiber bundle is mixed with a thermosetting resin [first chemical functional group] and molded to produce CFRP. Paragraph 0095 discloses a sizing agent [surface modifier/second chemical functional group] on the recycled carbon fiber bundle. Sugino is silent to the surface modifier being present in the amount of 0.1 to 0.8 weight %. Sugiura discloses a carbon fiber reinforced composite material including sized carbon fibers [0001]. Paragraph 0031 of Sugiura discloses that the sizing agent is adhered to the carbon fibers in the amount of 0.1 to 5%. Paragraph 0034 of Sugiura discloses that the sizing agent has an excellent affinity with various matrix resins. Paragraph 0027 of Sugiura discloses that the sizing agent includes an organic residue having a functional group such as a carboxyl group. Paragraph 0043 of Sugiura discloses that the affinity of the carbon fiber surface including the sizing agent having a carboxyl functional group to epoxy resin, vinyl ester resin, unsaturated polyesters and acrylic resin. Sugino and Sugiura are analogous art in that both references are directed to carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites wherein the carbon fibers are sized. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention would utilize the sizing agent having a carboxyl group in the amount of 0.1 to 5% and epoxy resin of Sugiura in Sugino for the benefit of obtaining enhanced affinity of the carbon fiber surface to the thermosetting matrix resin. The combination of Sugino and Sugiura teach the claimed invention but fails to teach that an amount of residual carbon content measured when the recycled-carbon-fiber tow composition has been heated in a condition of 600°C X60 minutes is 1 to 5 weight%. It is reasonable to presume that an amount of residual carbon content measured when the recycled-carbon-fiber tow composition has been heated in a condition of 600°CX60 minutes is 1 to 5 weight% is inherent to the combination of Sugino and Sugiura. Said presumption is based upon the disclosure of Sugino in view Sugiura wherein Sugino discloses a recycled carbon fiber bundle extracted from a carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting resin molding [0001] wherein the recycled carbon fiber bundle can be used as a raw material for CFRP [carbon fiber reinforced plastic - sheet] [0010]. Paragraph 0011 discloses that carbon fibers are bundled into a tow shape with an amorphous carbon precursor derived from a thermosetting resin [0020 and 0022]. Paragraph 0058 discloses that the matrix resin is converted [no resin residue] into an amorphous carbon precursor Paragraph 0035 discloses that the recycled carbon fiber bundle is mixed with a thermosetting resin [first chemical functional group] and molded to produce CFRP. Paragraph 0095 discloses a sizing agent [surface modifier/second chemical functional group] on the recycled carbon fiber bundle. Sugino is silent to the surface modifier being present in the amount of 0.1 to 0.8 weight %. Sugiura discloses a carbon fiber reinforced composite material including sized carbon fibers [0001]. Paragraph 0031 discloses that the sizing agent is adhered to the carbon fibers in the amount of 0.1 to 5%. Paragraph 0034 discloses that the sizing agent has an excellent affinity with various matrix resins. Paragraph 0027 of Sugiura discloses that the sizing agent includes an organic residue having a functional group such as a carboxyl group. Paragraph 0043 of Sugiura discloses that the affinity of the carbon fiber surface including the sizing agent having a carboxyl functional group to epoxy resin, vinyl ester resin, unsaturated polyesters and acrylic resin. Sugino and Sugiura are analogous art in that both references are directed to carbon fiber reinforce thermosetting composites wherein the carbon fibers are sized. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention would utilize the sizing agent having a carboxyl group in the amount of 0.1 to 5% and epoxy resin of Sugiura in Sugino for the benefit of obtaining enhanced affinity of the carbon fiber surface to the thermosetting matrix resin. Burden is upon Applicant to prove otherwise. Fitzgerald, In re, 619 F.2d 67, 205 USPQ 594 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 2, Sugiura discloses in paragraph 0027 that the sizing agent includes a carboxyl functional group. Paragraph 0043 discloses that the thermosetting matrix can include epoxy resin, vinyl ester resin [ester group]. Regarding claim 4, paragraph 0038 of Sugino discloses that the recycled carbon fiber bundle is manufactured by heating the CFRP to a temperature in the range of 400 °C to 480 °C and keeping the oxygen concentration of the atmosphere gas at 15-19 volume percent [0042]. Regarding claim 5, paragraph 0062 Sugino discloses that the average flow velocity of the atmospheric gas ranges from 1 to 20 m/min [0.017 m/second to 0.33 m/second] which is with Applicant's claimed range. Regarding claim 6, paragraph 0050 of Sugino discloses when the temperature reaches 350°C, the decomposition state of the CFRP is checked to determine whether the decomposition reaction has terminated by checking whether the exhaust gas has an odor or a strange color, and by checking with an oxygen sensor or the like that the oxygen concentration is stable. It is preferable to continue heating to above 350°C after the decomposition reaction has terminated. If the decomposition reaction is not completed and the mixture is heated to above 350°C, oxidation occurs rapidly, making it difficult to control the temperature and resulting in the generation of white smoke and unpleasant odors. Furthermore, a rapid oxidation reaction may prevent the formation of a tow. Furthermore, the temperature of the CFRP may rise suddenly, possibly causing it to explode. The completion of the decomposition reaction can be determined by observing whether white smoke and an unpleasant odor are generated [fuming], and if neither white smoke nor an unpleasant odor is generated, it can be determined that the decomposition reaction has completed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the present claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMIE S THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1530. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd, can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMIE S THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 24, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635468
HOLDING TOOL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630474
FORMALDEHYDE-FREE BINDER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE BINDERS UNDER CONTROLLED ACIDIC CONDITIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623948
OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM AND METHOD FOR DRAWING OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM
4y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624166
FILMS FOR MULTIPLE LAYERS ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616274
TEXTILES AND ARTICLES AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+10.5%)
3y 5m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1319 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month