Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/564,522

Perforating Gun with Timed Self-Sealing Threads

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Examiner
GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hunting Titan Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
1012 granted / 1188 resolved
+33.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1188 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on October 2, 2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment This Action is in response to the above referenced RCE. Claims 4-6, 13-15, and 19 have been cancelled. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 12, and 18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. It is noted that Applicant has argued that Enderle does not teach a positive stop that is defined relative to the longitudinal axis of the gun housing. However, as seen in Figures 6B and 6C, the stop 600 can be oriented at an angle to, i.e. not orthogonal to, the longitudinal axis. These embodiments would have rendered the new limitations of claims 1, 12, and 18 obvious. As this is not the intended interpretation of the claim language, the Enderle reference has been replaced with Mallis et al. (US 2002/0027363) and Mallis et al. (US 2006/0145480). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 9 and 10: Limitations similar to those of claims 9 and 10 have been incorporated into claim 1. As such, it is unclear if the “positive stop” of claims 9 and 10 is the same as that of claim 1 or a separate stop. For the purposes of examination, they are being treated as the same feature. Regarding claim 11: Claim 11 is considered indefinite due to its dependence on claim 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 7, 9-12, 16, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vass et al. (US 2023/0175326, Vass) in view of Robey (US 2019/0368320, Robey), as evidenced by Sauthoff et al. (US 2020/0190972, Sauthoff), Roberts et al. (US 2021/0355797, Roberts), and Mallis et al. (US 2002/0027363, Mallis), as evidenced by Mallis et al. (US 2006/0145480, Mallis2). Regarding claims 1-3, 9, and 10: Vass discloses a perforating gun system 32 – Fig 3 comprising: a first perforating gun 33a having a housing extending along a first long axis fig 1, 3 with a first end Fig 1, 3, a second end 112 with first alignment mechanism 170a, and a first set of scallops 70a aligned with the alignment mechanism Fig 1, 3; a second perforating gun 33b having a housing extending along a second long axis Fig 1, 3 with a first end 118 with a second alignment mechanism 170b coupled to the first alignment mechanism of the second end of the first perforating gun Fig 1, 3, and a second set of scallops 70b aligned with the second alignment mechanism, wherein the coupling of the first perforating gun to the second perforating gun aligns the first set of scallops with the second set of scallops Fig 1, 3; and a threaded engagement 110/116 between the first perforating gun and the second perforating gun. Vass, while disclosing a first and second alignment member, fails to disclose the use of an alignment feature in a gun system that also includes a pressure bulkhead or that the threaded engagement included timed threads. Robey discloses a perforating gun system that can include a cluster of perforating guns. Robey teaches that these guns can be connected using threads or timed threads [0020], [0021]. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified Vass so that the male and female threads were timed threads, as suggested by Robey, in order to have been able to ensure the proper alignment of the guns and the scallops thereon [0065] of Sauthoff. The modification of Vass to use timed threads for the alignment mechanism would have eliminated the alignment member 120 shown in Figure 4 of Vass. Vass, as modified, fails to disclose the use of a pressure bulkhead that includes sealing portion having a first shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the first perforating gun and a second shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the second perforating gun so the sealing portion is captured between the housings of the first and second perforating guns to cooperate with a threaded engagement of the housings of the first and second perforating guns to provide metal-to-metal pressure sealing between adjacent perforating guns and between an interior and an exterior of the housings or a positive stop at the point of full engagement between the second end of the first perforating gun and the first end of the second perforating gun that resists rotation beyond a predetermined point of thread engagement, and wherein the positive stop is an angled face angled relative to the first long axis and the second long axis in a horizontal plane and wherein the angled face is angled such that torque applied to threaded joint between the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing is converted to axial force thereby improving sealing and pressure resistance of the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing. Roberts discloses a perforating gun system Fig 2. The gun system of Roberts includes a first perforating gun 121 with female threads Fig 3 and a second perforating gun 123 with male threads Fig 3. The system further includes sealing portion 306 having a first shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the first perforating gun at A (see reproduction of Figure 3 below) and a second shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the second perforating gun at B (see reproduction of Figure 3 below) so the sealing portion is captured between the housings of the first and second perforating guns to cooperate with a threaded engagement of the housings of the first and second perforating guns Fig 3 to provide metal-to-metal pressure sealing between adjacent perforating guns and between an interior and an exterior of the housings [0037] – containment of pressure disclosed and no threads between the threads or sealing portion and threads disclosed. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (A)][AltContent: textbox (B)] PNG media_image1.png 456 558 media_image1.png Greyscale It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have further modified Vass to include the pressure bulkhead of Roberts in order to have been able to seal explosive pressure from adjacent perforating guns and thus protect the threads from distortion, galling, and disfigurement caused by explosive pressure [0017]. Vass, as modified, fails to disclose the use of a positive stop at the point of full engagement between the second end of the first perforating gun and the first end of the second perforating gun that resists rotation beyond a predetermined point of thread engagement, and wherein the positive stop is an angled face angled relative to the first long axis and the second long axis in a horizontal plane and wherein the angled face is angled such that torque applied to threaded joint between the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing is converted to axial force thereby improving sealing and pressure resistance of the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing. Mallis discloses a threaded connection that includes a pin/male member 16 and a box/female member 14 that both define the longitudinal axis of the made-up connection. The connection includes a positive stop torque shoulder at 24 in Fig 2 that is an angled face angled relative to the longitudinal axis of the connection Fig 2, 4A-4D to prevent further rotation beyond a predetermine point of thread engagement [0004] and form a metal-to-metal seal at the shoulder Fig 6a-6f. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have further modified Voss to include the positive stop taught by Mallis in order to have formed a threaded connection that was secure and pressure sealed without applying excessive torque or work energy during make-up [0003] of Mallis2. Regarding claims 7, 11, 16: Wherein the positive stop is a 45-degree angled face Fig 4B of Mallis. Regarding claims 12 and 18: Vass discloses a perforating gun system 32 – Fig 3 comprising: a first perforating gun 33a having a housing with a first end Fig 1, 3, a second end 112 with first alignment mechanism 170a, and a first set of scallops 70a aligned with the alignment mechanism Fig 1, 3; a second perforating gun 33b having a housing with a first end 118 with a second alignment mechanism 170b coupled to the first alignment mechanism of the second end of the first perforating gun Fig 1, 3, and a second set of scallops 70b aligned with the second alignment mechanism, wherein the coupling of the first perforating gun to the second perforating gun aligns the first set of scallops with the second set of scallops Fig 1, 3. Vass discloses all of the limitations of the above claim(s) except the first and second alignment mechanisms being timed male and female threads. Robey discloses a perforating gun system that can include a cluster of perforating guns. Robey teaches that these guns can be connected using threads or timed threads. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified Vass so that the male and female threads were timed threads, as suggested by Robey, in order to have been able to ensure the proper alignment of the guns and the scallops thereon [0065] of Sauthoff. The modification of Vass to use timed threads for the alignment mechanism would have eliminated the alignment member 120 shown in Figure 4 of Vass. Vass, as modified, fails to disclose the use of a pressure bulkhead that includes sealing portion having a first shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the first perforating gun and a second shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the second perforating gun so the sealing portion is captured between the housings of the first and second perforating guns to cooperate with a threaded engagement of the housings of the first and second perforating guns to provide metal-to-metal pressure sealing between adjacent perforating guns and between an interior and an exterior of the housings or a positive stop at the point of full engagement between the second end of the first perforating gun and the first end of the second perforating gun that resists rotation beyond a predetermined point of thread engagement, and wherein the positive stop is an angled face angled relative to the first long axis and the second long axis in a horizontal plane and wherein the angled face is angled such that torque applied to threaded joint between the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing is converted to axial force thereby improving sealing and pressure resistance of the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing. Roberts discloses a perforating gun system Fig 2. The gun system of Roberts includes a first perforating gun 121 with female threads Fig 3 and a second perforating gun 123 with male threads Fig 3. The system further includes sealing portion 306 having a first shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the first perforating gun at A (see reproduction of Figure 3 above) and a second shoulder in metal-to-metal engagement with a shoulder of the housing of the second perforating gun at B (see reproduction of Figure 3 above) so the sealing portion is captured between the housings of the first and second perforating guns to cooperate with a threaded engagement of the housings of the first and second perforating guns Fig 3 to provide metal-to-metal pressure sealing between adjacent perforating guns and between an interior and an exterior of the housings [0037] – containment of pressure disclosed and no threads between the threads or sealing portion and threads disclosed. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have further modified Vass to include the pressure bulkhead of Roberts in order to have been able to seal explosive pressure from adjacent perforating guns and thus protect the threads from distortion, galling, and disfigurement caused by explosive pressure [0017]. Vass, as modified, fails to disclose the use of a positive stop at the point of full engagement between the second end of the first perforating gun and the first end of the second perforating gun that resists rotation beyond a predetermined point of thread engagement, and wherein the positive stop is an angled face angled relative to the first long axis and the second long axis in a horizontal plane and wherein the angled face is angled such that torque applied to threaded joint between the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing is converted to axial force thereby improving sealing and pressure resistance of the first perforating gun housing and the second perforating gun housing. Mallis discloses a threaded connection that includes a pin/male member 16 and a box/female member 14 that both define the longitudinal axis of the made-up connection. The connection includes a positive stop torque shoulder at 24 in Fig 2 that is an angled face angled relative to the longitudinal axis of the connection Fig 2, 4A-4D to prevent further rotation beyond a predetermine point of thread engagement [0004] and form a metal-to-metal seal at the shoulder Fig 6a-6f. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have further modified Voss to include the positive stop taught by Mallis in order to have formed a threaded connection that was secure and pressure sealed without applying excessive torque or work energy during make-up [0003] of Mallis2. Claim(s) 8, 17, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vass in view of Roby, with Sauthoff, Roberts, and Mallis, with Maillis2, as applied to claims 3, 12, an 18 above, and further in view of Bradley et al. (US 2019/0195054, Bradley). Regarding claims 8 and 17: Vass, as modified, discloses all of the limitations of the above claim(s) except the timed male threads and timed female threads being self-sealing. Bradley discloses a perforating gun system that includes a first gun with a second end and a second gun with a first end Fig 1. It is disclosed that the threads can be self-sealing [0023], [0190]. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have further modified Vass so that the threads were self-sealing, as taught by Bradley, in order to have provided a fluid pressure seal between one gun body and another without the need for O-rings [0190]. Regarding claim 20: Vass, as modified, discloses all of the limitations of the above claim(s) except for the full engagement of the first perforating gun with the second perforating gun providing a pressure seal between the inside of the perforating gun string and the outside of the perforating gun string. Bradley discloses a perforating gun system that includes a first gun with a second end and a second gun with a first end Fig 1. It is taught that fluid pressure seals can be formed between the two ends using at least one O-ring with O-ring grooves 112 located between the two ends Fig 7, [0167] or the threads can be self-sealing [0023], [0190]. It would have been considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have further modified Vass to include at least one O-ring between the second end of the first perforating gun and the first end of the second perforating gun, as taught by Bradley, in order to have provided a fluid pressure seal between one gun body and another [0167], [0190]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER H GAY whose telephone number is (571)272-7029. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 6-3:30 and every other Friday 6-11. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anita Y Coupe can be reached at (571)270-3614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER H GAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619 JHG 10/15/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jun 03, 2025
Interview Requested
Jun 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 17, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Oct 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595682
A BORING AND ROUTING TEMPLATE JIG FOR DOOR HARDWARE INSTALLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584374
Methods for Determining Positions of Fluid Interfaces and Detecting Cement Setting in a Subterranean Wellbore
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571274
SETTING TOOL ADAPTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571300
TOOL POSITIONING TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553309
ADJUSTABLE WHIPSTOCK ISOLATION MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1188 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month