Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/564,548

OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE DEVICE, AND OPTICAL MODULATION DEVICE AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION APPARATUS USING SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Examiner
PETKOVSEK, DANIEL
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1316 granted / 1572 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1606
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1572 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the amendment filed on January 29, 2026. In accordance with this amendment, claims 1-5 have been amended. Claims 1-6 remain pending, with claim 1 as the sole independent claim. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: the typo “tow electrodes” should read “two electrodes.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitations “the two control electrodes” and “the tow (sic: two) electrodes” in the claim body. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 only recites one electrode (the “control electrode”), and thereof claim 2 is found vague / indefinite under the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 3-6 are allowed. Claim 1 is the sole pending independent claim and has been amended into condition for allowance in the paper as was filed on January 29, 2026. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the closest prior art of record (Okahashi US ‘997; Jaeger US ‘952; JP ‘385) does not expressly teach or reasonably suggest, in combination, each claim limitation as amended into independent claim 1 on January 29, 2026. In particular, the Examiner must consider the context of those amended features in view of the original specification and drawings (most notably Figs. 3, 5, and 6D). For these reasons, the Examiner is unable to present a prima facie case of obviousness for claim 1 as required under 35 U.S.C. 103. Claims 3-6 are also allowed at least as being in dependent claim form. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see amendment with remarks (pages 4-7), filed January 29, 2026, with respect to the amendments to at least independent claim 1, have been fully considered and are persuasive. Based on narrowing amendments of claim 1, all prior art rejections mailed on October 29, 2025 have been withdrawn. Claims 1 and 3-6 now serve to create a patentable distinction over the closest prior art of record. However, the amendments to dependent claim 2 have been rejected herein under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). This claim 2 is vague and indefinite under the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 112(b), as is fully addressed above in section (4). Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. The finality is based on the amendments to change dependent claim 2 as filed, which are vague / indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daniel Petkovsek whose telephone number is (571) 272-4174. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 - 6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at (571) 272-2397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL PETKOVSEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874 February 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596225
MANAGING ADHESIVE MATERIAL SHAPING USING STRUCTURE ARRAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591087
DISPLAY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591086
LIGHT GUIDE AND VIDEO DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585110
COMPACT HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY SYSTEM HAVING SMALL INPUT APERTURE AND LARGE OUTPUT APERTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575893
Shape Sensing Fiber Optic Tip Protection Systems and Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1572 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month