Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/564,569

INTERTWINED ELECTRODE NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Priority
May 28, 2021 — provisional 63/194,615 +5 more
Examiner
MCCONNELL, WYATT P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Innovasion Labs Pinc Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
842 granted / 1046 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1067
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
76.3%
+36.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1046 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The use of the term SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 7 ® which is a trade name or a mark used in commerce, has been noted in this application. The term should be accompanied by the generic terminology; furthermore the term should be capitalized wherever it appears or, where appropriate, include a proper symbol indicating use in commerce such as ™, SM , or ® following the term. Although the use of trade names and marks used in commerce (i.e., trademarks, service marks, certification marks, and collective marks) are permissible in patent applications, the proprietary nature of the marks should be respected and every effort made to prevent their use in any manner which might adversely affect their validity as commercial marks. Claim Warning Applicant is advised that should claim 3 be found allowable, claim 12 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15, 51, and 52 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1-15, the preamble of each of these claims is directed to a “nano-deivce” which is necessarily of narrower scope than the unmodified “device”. However, it is unclear if “nano” is meant to place a limit on a maximum dimension of the device (i.e., implies an additional limitation beyond those recited in the broadest claim) or instead , limit the types of materials and objects that may make up the device, etc., The term is not clearly defined in the specification, nor is it an understood term of art with a known specific meaning. Further regarding claim 9, there is no antecedent basis for “the first terminal”. For examination purposes it will be presumed that this claim should depend from claim 4 rather than claim 3. Similarly regarding claim 10, there is no antecedent basis for “the second terminal”, and for examination purposes it will be presumed that the claim is intended to depend from claim 4. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, 13-15, and 48-52 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0027793 to Joo (“Joo”). Regarding claims 1, 7, 48, and 50, Joo discloses electrodes for lithium batteries, the electrodes comprising a substrate made of a conductive porous mesh of carbon nanotubes corresponding to the recited mesh of conductive nanostructures of claim 1 and the plurality of conductive nanostructures of claim 48. This conductive mesh of carbon nanotubes is further coated with a conductive additive selected from nanostructured carbon black and carbon nanotubes. This conductive additive is considered to correspond to the recited nanoparticle network of claim 1. Further regarding claims 4 and 5, the battery of Joo includes a current collector attached to the outer surface of the negative electrode substrate, and a current collector attached to the outer surface of the positive electrode substrate, each of which is considered to correspond to a first and second terminal respectively with the electrode substrates located therebetween. Further regarding claims 9 and 49, because the current collector of the negative electrode is in contact with the substrate, it is in electrical contact with the carbon nanotubes of the carbon nanotube mesh making up that substrate. Further regarding claims 13-15, 51, and 52, Joo uses the term “nanostructured” as it is understood in the art (i.e., to refer to materials having a diameter less than 1 micron, including from 5nm to 250nm). Moroever, they are disclosed as having a length ranging from 1 micron to 500 microns. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WYATT P MCCONNELL whose telephone number is (571)270-7531. The examiner can normally be reached 9am to 5pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WYATT P MCCONNELL/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683212
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, CONTROL CIRCUIT, AND VEHICLE USING THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671089
BINDER FOR RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE INCLUDING SAME, AND RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665227
BATTERY MODULE, A BATTERY PACK, AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, A BMM CARRIER, A BMM ARRANGEMENT AND A METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING A BATTERY MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665254
MANUAL SERVICE DISCONNECT FOR A BATTERY SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658463
System and Method for Manufacturing Secondary Battery
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1046 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month