DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/27/24 and 5/9/25 are being considered by the examiner.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cheng et al. (US 2020/0053721 A1).
Consider claim 16, Cheng teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication (abstract), comprising:
at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory (Fig. 31, all UE would include a memory and a processor) and configured to cause the UE to:
receive information for determining a plurality of beams (Fig. 30, step 3002 and Fig. 6, the PUCCH resource ID may indicate one of the ten configured PUCCH resources);
receive a beam indication indicating at least one beam of the plurality of beams to be used for transmission of a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource (Fig. 30, step 3004 and Fig. 6 and paragraph 81); and
transmit the PUCCH resource according to the beam indication (paragraph 3-4 and 53-54).
Consider claims 1 and 23, claims 1 and 23 having similar limitations as claim 16, therefore, claims 1 and 23 are rejected for the same reasons claim 16 is rejected.
Consider claim 8, claim 8 is a base station claim which transmits to and receives from the UE of claim 16 and having similar limitations as claim 16. Therefore, claim 8 is rejected for the same reasons claim 16 is rejected.
Consider claims 2, 3, 9 and 17-18, Cheng also teaches wherein the beam indication is transmitted in at least one of configuration information of the PUCCH resource, or configuration information of a PUCCH resource group at least comprising the PUCCH resource (Fig. 6 and paragraph 56, 66 and 113-114).
Consider claims 4, 11 and 19, Cheng also teaches wherein the beam indication is received in a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) associated with the PUCCH resource, and the MAC CE indicates an identity of a serving cell for which the MAC CE is applied and an identity of a bandwidth part (BWP) for which the MAC CE is applied (Fig. 5-6 and paragraph 71 and 93).
Consider claims 5, 12 and 20, Cheng also teaches wherein the MAC CE indicates an identity of the PUCCH resource or an identity of another PUCCH resource in a PUCCH resource group at least comprising the PUCCH resource (Fig. 6 and paragraph (Fig. 6 and paragraph 56, 66 and 113-114).
Consider claims 6, 12 and 21, Cheng also teaches wherein for the PUCCH resource group, the MAC CE comprises an identity of only one PUCCH resource of the PUCCH resource group (Fig. 6 and paragraph 56, 66 and 113-114).
Consider claims 7, 14 and 22, Cheng also teaches wherein the plurality of beams is a first beam and a second beam, and the beam indication indicates at least one of the first beam or the second beam for the PUCCH resource (Fig. 5 and 6 and paragraph 3-4, 56, 66, 111 and 113).
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN YE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-5258. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-8:00.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 5712705371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/JUSTIN Y LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644 3/20/26
Prosecution Insights