Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/564,751

Eyewear and Cartridge

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
May 28, 2021 — JP 2021-089749 +1 more
Examiner
JONES, JAMES
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tsubota Laboratory, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1176 granted / 1329 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
1338
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§102
75.4%
+35.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1329 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/28/2024 and 4/29/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: in line 8, the claim states “the temple or the end piece” which appears to be a typographical error because the claim initially recites in lines 3 and 4, a “pair of end pieces” and a “pair of temples.” For examination purposes the assumed meaning is “the pair of temples” and “the pair of end pieces.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: in line 3, the claim states “height method” which appears to be an in advertent typographical error. For examination purposes the assumed meaning is “height direction.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 11, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsubota (20200229973) hereafter Tsubota. Regarding claims 1 and 11, Tsubota discloses in figs 1-7 the eyewear comprising: a front (fig. 4, the front of element 3 as the claimed “front”); a pair of end pieces (fig. 4, par. [0058], lines 5-8, element 4 as the claimed “end pieces”) disposed at both ends of the front (see fig. 4, note element 4 is on the left end and right end of the frame 3); a pair of temples (6) respectively connected to the pair of end pieces (fig. 4, par. [0058], lines 5-8); and a cartridge (1 or 31) having a raw material containing portion (11) that contains a raw material (fig. 4, par. [0066], lines 1-7), a spray element (16) that uses the raw material to spray a mist (par. [0061], lines 1-5), and a control circuit substrate (par. [0065], lines 1-5, par. [0126], line 6) that controls the spray element (16), the cartridge (1 or 31) being detachably connected (par. [0019], lines 2-3, par. [0070], lines 5-12) to the pair of temples or the pair of end pieces (fig. 6, par. [0070], lines 10-12). Regarding claims 2 and 12, Tsubota discloses the eyewear according to claim 1, wherein the cartridge (1 or 31) includes a main body containing portion (seen in fig. 6 and 8, the portion of the container where elements 11 and 16 are contained as the claimed “main body”) having a width direction, a height direction, and a depth direction, and the width direction serves as a longitudinal direction (see fig 6 and 8, clearly depicts the main body having a width, length, and depth direction), and the main body containing portion includes a first containing area (the area where element 11 is located as the claimed “first containing area”) in which the raw material containing portion (11) is configured and a second containing area (the areas where element 16 is located as the claimed “second containing area”) in which the spray element (16) is contained, and the first containing area and the second containing area are arranged side by side in the depth direction (fig. 6, 8, par. [0070][0081], par. [0083], lines 10-15). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10, 13, and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art does not disclose the claimed combination of limitations to warrant a rejection under 35 USC 102 or 103. Regarding claim 3, the prior art does not disclose the claimed eyewear specifically including as the distinguishing features in combination with the other limitations the claimed “wherein the main body containing portion includes a third containing area in which the control circuit substrate is contained, and the first containing area or the second containing area, and the third containing area are arranged side by side in the width direction.” Regarding claim 4 (and its dependents), the prior art does not disclose the claimed eyewear specifically including as the distinguishing features in combination with the other limitations the claimed “wherein the cartridge is connected along a longitudinal direction of the temple, and the cartridge is detachable when the temple is folded with respect to the front, while being undetachable when the temple is unfolded with respect to the front.” Regarding claim 10, the prior art does not disclose the claimed eyewear specifically including as the distinguishing features in combination with the other limitations the claimed “ wherein the cartridge includes a terminal to be connected to a power source provided in a portion of the eyewear except for the cartridge, and the terminal is electrically disconnected from the power source when the temple is folded with respect to the front, while being electrically connected to the power source when the temple is unfolded with respect to the front.” Regarding claim 13, the prior art does not disclose the claimed eyewear specifically including as the distinguishing features in combination with the other limitations the claimed “wherein the main body containing portion includes a third containing area in which the control circuit substrate is contained, and the third containing area, and the first containing area or the second containing area, are arranged side by side in the width direction.” Regarding claim 14, the prior art does not disclose the claimed eyewear specifically including as the distinguishing features in combination with the other limitations the claimed “a terminal to be connected to a power source provided on an eyewear side, wherein the terminal is electrically disconnected from the power source when the temple is folded with respect to a front of the eyewear, while being electrically connected to the power source when the temple is unfolded with respect to the front.” Conclusion Tanaka (20150077696) is being cited herein to show a reference that discloses some similar features to that of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-1278. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pinping Sun can be reached at (571) 270-1284. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES C. JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639552
Reconfigurable wavelength selective splitter
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633719
LASER BEAM DEVICE WITH COUPLING OF AN ILLUMINATING LASER BEAM INTO AN EFFECTIVE LASER BEAM
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631790
PLASTIC LENS ELEMENT, OPTICAL IMAGING MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625386
PROPORTIONAL FRAME DEFLECTION TO MAINTAIN GLASSES DISPLAY ALIGNMENT
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625340
Lens Alignment
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1329 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month