Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/564,755

CYLINDRICAL SECONDARY BATTERY, AND BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE COMPRISING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Priority
Aug 13, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0107670 +3 more
Examiner
BUCHANAN, JACOB
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
338 granted / 603 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
638
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
86.0%
+46.0% vs TC avg
§102
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 603 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
1DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-20 and 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (US 2024/0250355, which has priority to 5/21/2021) in view of Cheon et al. (US 2005/0287428) and Ferraro et al. (US 2002/0081490). Regarding claim 1, Huang discloses a cylindrical lithium-ion battery ([0003]) comprising a case 1 [battery can], a positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal] and an insulating sealing member (abstract, Figs 1-2). A jellyroll 2 [electrode assembly having a first polarity and a second polarity] is accommodated in the case 1 ([0026], Figs 1-2). In an embodiment, the case 1 is electrically connected to the negative current collecting plate 8, and the case 1 [battery can] is electrically connected to an electrode ([0044]-[0046]), where a negative cap 9 [cap plate] closes an open end of the case 1 ([0046], Fig 13). The positive pole 4 is electrically connected to the positive electrode [first polarity] of the jelly roll through a surface of the case 1 ([0026], Fig 2). However, Huang does not explicitly disclose wherein the electrode assembly includes a first and second uncoated region. Cheon discloses a secondary battery including a case, an electrode assembly 20 including a positive electrode 22, a negative electrode 23, and a separator 21 interposed therebetween (abstract, Fig 1). The positive electrode 22 and negative electrode 23 respectively have un-coated regions 22b and 23b [regions not having a coating of an active material] ([0039], Fig 2). These un-coated regions 22b,23b are respectively connected to a positive current collecting plate 50 and a negative current collecting plate 70 for collecting current ([0039]). These un-coated regions are bent toward the center of the electrode assembly ([0051], Fig 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the uncoated regions of the electrodes of the electrode assembly of Cheon with the electrodes of the jellyroll of Huang for the purpose of having areas to connect with collecting plates. Huang does not explicitly disclose the case [battery can] having different thicknesses. Ferraro discloses a casing 10 for cylindrical electrochemical cells (abstract). The casing is characterized by having a non-uniform wall thickness (abstract). The casing comprises a cylindrical body surface 20 [sidewall], an open end/peripheral edge 40/50 [part nearest crimping portion], and an integrally formed closed bottom 30 [surface of can] (abstract, [0017], Fig 1). The casing 10 is characterized by having a wall thickness of the body 20 is less than the thickness of the bottom 30, and also having a wall thickness of the peripheral edge 40 which is greater than the wall thickness of the body 20 ([0017]); that is, both the bottom 30 and the peripheral edge 40 have a thickness greater than wall thickness of the body 20. The casing is sealed by crimping the peripheral edge of the casing over an end cap assembly ([0007]). Ferraro teaches that this design allows for the amount of internal volume for active material to be as great as possible, while still strong enough to withstand the crimping force needed to provide a tight seal ([0006]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the non-uniform thickness of the casing [including a thinner wall thickness of the body, compared to the bottom and peripheral edge] of Ferraro with the battery of Huang for the purpose of increasing the amount of internal volume for active material, while still strong enough to withstand crimping forces needed to provide a tight seal. Regarding claims 2-3 and 6, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang further discloses (claim 2) the case 1 [battery can] including: a beading portion located at the open portion of the battery can, the beading portion extending inward around an outer circumferential surface of the battery can; and a crimping portion configured to fix the cap plate such that the cap plate is located between the beading portion and the crimping portion (see Fig 13). Huang further teaches (claim 3) that the crimping portion is located at an edge area of the cap plate, the crimping portion extending to cover at least a part of the lower surface of the cap plate (Fig 13). Huang further teaches (claim 6) that an area of the crimping portion that covers the at least part of the lower surface of the cap plate includes a flat area (Fig 13). PNG media_image1.png 270 993 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang discloses an insulating layer [sealing gasket] arranged between the negative cap 9 [cap plate] and the case 1 [battery can] ([0046]). Because the edges are crimped, the insulating layer is interposed between the crimping portion of the battery can and the cap plate. Regarding claim 5, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Ferraro further teaches that the peripheral edge 40 connects with an transition surface 50 to the body 20 ([0017], Fig 1); therefore the transition surface 50 has a thickness between that of the peripheral edge and the body. As the peripheral edge 40 and transition surface 50 are part of the portion that is crimped ([0007], [0017]), an area of the crimping portion [transition surface 50] that covers at least part of the lower surface of the cap plate is thicker than a remaining area of the crimping portion [peripheral edge 40]. Regarding claims 7-8, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Ferraro further teaches that the peripheral edge 40 connects with an transition surface 50 to the body 20 ([0017], Fig 1), and therefore both have a thickness greater than the body. As the peripheral edge 40 and transition surface 50 are part of the portion that is crimped ([0007], [0017]), (claim 7) the crimping portion that covers the edge of the cap plate is thicker than a remaining sidewall of the battery can, and (claim 8) wherein the beading portion and the crimping portion are thicker than a remaining sidewall of the battery can. Regarding claim 9, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Ferraro further teaches that the peripheral edge 40 is thicker than the sidewall of the body 20 ([0017]); and therefore the sidewall of the battery is thinner than a partially closed portion [from crimping] of the battery can opposite the open portion. Regarding claims 10-11, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang discloses that the positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal] is disposed at a center of the surface of the battery can, where the surface is opposite the open portion; and discloses a terminal exposure portion [first cylinder 41] extending outward from the case 1 [battery can], and a terminal insertion portion penetrating the surface of the case 1 [battery can] ([0026], see Figs 2-5). Regarding claims 12-13, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang discloses an upper insulating sealing member 51 [insulation gasket] interposed between the case 1 [battery can] and the positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal]; and includes a gasket exposure portion extending outward from the battery can (see Fig 2), and a gasket insertion portion [first annular protrusion block 71; second annular protrusion 72] penetrating the surface of the case 1 [battery can] ([0036], see Figs 2 and 6-7). Regarding claim 14, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang teaches that the positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal] is riveted to the case ([0006], [0026], and see portions which are connected inside the case 1), and is therefore considered to be rivet-coupled to an inner surface of the battery can. Regarding claim 15, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. As seen in Figure 2, the positive current collecting plate 3 [first current collector plate] has a first surface coupled to the positive electrode of the jelly roll 2, and a second surface coupled to the positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal] ([0026], Fig 2). Regarding claims 16-17, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang discloses that the positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal] is disposed at a center of the surface of the battery can, where the surface is opposite the open portion; and discloses a terminal exposure portion [first cylinder 41] extending outward from the case 1 [battery can], and a terminal insertion portion penetrating the surface of the case 1 [battery can] ([0026], see Figs 2-5). Regarding claims 18-19, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang further discloses a lower insulating sealing member 52 [insulator] interposed between the first current collector plate 3, and the case 1; wherein the positive pole 4 [penetrating terminal] is coupled to the positive current collecting plate 3 through the insulator 52 ([0026]-[0027], Fig 2). Regarding claim 20, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Cheon further teaches that the uncoated regions are bent towards the winding center ([0051], Fig 4). Regarding claim 22, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Huang discloses that the negative cap plate 9 is not connected to the negative current collecting plate 8 ([0046]), and therefore the cap plate 9 is electrically insulated from the jellyroll [electrode assembly] and is non-polar. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (US 2024/0250355, which has priority to 5/21/2021) in view of Cheon et al. (US 2005/0287428) and Ferraro et al. (US 2002/0081490), as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Guen (US 2017/0170450). Regarding claim 21, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. However, Huang does not explicitly disclose wherein the cap includes a venting portion configured to rupture when an internal pressure of the battery can rises above a predetermined level. Guen discloses a rechargeable battery including an electrode assembly, a case accommodating the electrode assembly, a cap plate covering the case, and a terminal plate (abstract). The cap plate 150 further includes a safety vent 151 wherein the safety vent 151 is configured to rupture to release internal gases when the internal pressure of the case 120 rises ([0047]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the safety vent of the cap plate of Guen with the negative cap [cap plate] of Huang for the purpose of releasing gases when the internal pressure in the case rises. Claim(s) 23-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (US 2024/0250355, which has priority to 5/21/2021) in view of Cheon et al. (US 2005/0287428) and Ferraro et al. (US 2002/0081490), as applied to claim 1, and further in view of Fuhr et al. (US 2009/0208836). Regarding claims 23-24, modified Huang discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. However, Huang does not explicitly disclose (claim 23) a battery pack comprising a plurality of cylindrical secondary batteries according to claim 1, a pack housing accommodating the plurality of secondary batteries, or (claim 24) a vehicle comprising the battery pack. Fuhr discloses a battery that can be used in vehicles 12/100 as part of a battery system 14/102 ([0004], [0041]-[0043], Fig 1-1A). The battery system includes batteries 10,118, that are arranged in modules 117 with a housing or cover 142 ([0051], Fig 2A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a plurality of batteries, with a housing, in a vehicle as taught by Fuhr with the battery of Huang for the purpose of providing powering a vehicle and providing sufficient power and/or energy. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Huang et al. (CN 113346168, see machine translation) is very similar to reference relied upon above [Huang et al. (US 2024/0250355)] and discloses the same features. Huang CN 113346168 has a publication date 9/3/2021. Because the foreign priority of the current application has not been perfected by filing certified English translations, Huang CN 113346168 is considered prior art and a 102(a)(1) reference. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB BUCHANAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1186. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00 PM (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher can be reached at 571-270-3879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACOB BUCHANAN/ Examiner, Art Unit 1725 /NICOLE M. BUIE-HATCHER/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683248
BATTERY PACK
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12651808
TRACTION BATTERY PACK HAVING ELECTRICALLY CONNECTED BATTERY CELLS AND BATTERY CELL JOINING METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646798
BATTERY MODULE WITH IMPROVED FIRE PROTECTION PERFORMANCE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12620669
Battery Module and Battery Pack Including the Same
3y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620609
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING FUEL CELL SYSTEM, FUEL CELL SYSTEM, AND FUEL CELL VEHICLE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.3%)
3y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 603 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month