Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/565,169

PREPARATION METHOD FOR QLED DEVICE, DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, AFROZA Y
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
TCL Technology Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
589 granted / 816 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
834
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 816 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: the “reductive gas” term is introduced first time in this claim. Therefore, this should not state “the reductive gas”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-6, and 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hamilton et al. (US 10,985,336). As to claim 1, Hamilton discloses a preparation method for QLED device, comprising the following steps: providing a substrate (Fig. 1(102), col. 5, lines 48-61); forming a first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode) on the substrate (Fig. 1(102), col. 5, lines 48-61); forming a quantum dot light-emitting layer (Fig. 1(108): emissive layer contains emissive quantum dots) on the first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode) in a reducing gas atmosphere (col. 5, lines 48-61, col. 3, lines 5-23: in an ambient environment by the oxygen scavengers reducing the amount of oxygen); forming an electronic functional layer (Fig. 1(110): electron transport layer) on the quantum dot light-emitting layer (Fig. 1(108): emissive layer contains emissive quantum dots, col. 5, lines 48-61); and forming a second electrode layer (Fig. 1(112): cathode) on the electronic functional layer (Fig. 1(110): electron transport layer, col. 5, lines 48-61). As to claim 3, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein in the step of forming the quantum dot light-emitting layer, a reductive gas catalyst is used to accelerate the step, wherein the reductive gas catalyst is selected from one or more of Cu, Pt, and Au (col. 3, lines 5-23: use of a suitable oxygen scavenger and blend composition; for example, the addition of Pt containing nanoparticles that will react with oxygen in place of emissive quantum dots). As to claim 4, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the step of forming an electronic functional layer on a quantum dot light-emitting layer comprises: forming an electronic functional layer on the quantum dot light-emitting layer under an ultraviolet light irradiation (col. 10, lines 50-55: selectively photopattemed using ultraviolet light). As to claim 5, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein before the step of forming a quantum dot light-emitting layer (Fig. 1(108): emissive layer contains emissive quantum dots) on the first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode) in a reducing gas atmosphere, the method further comprises: forming a hole functional layer (Fig. 1(106): hole transport layer) on the first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode), and the hole functional layer (Fig. 1(106): hole transport layer) is disposed between the first electrode layer and the quantum dot light-emitting layer (Fig. 1(108): emissive layer contains emissive quantum dots). As to claim 6, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 5, wherein the step of forming a hole functional layer (Fig. 1(106): hole transport layer) on the first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode) comprises: forming a hole injection layer or a hole transport layer on the first electrode layer (col. 3, lines 41-44: hole injection layer, col. 5, lines 48-61: hole transport layer). As to claim 10, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein a material of the first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode) is selected from one or more of indium tin oxide, fluorine doped tin oxide, indium zinc oxide, graphene, and carbon nanotubes (col. 6, lines 33-46: indium tin oxide, indium-doped zinc oxide (IZO), fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO), and the like). As to claim 11, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein a material of the second electrode layer (Fig. 1(112): cathode) is selected from one or more of Al and Ag (col. 6, lines 33-46: aluminum (Al), silver (Ag)). As to claim 12, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the first electrode layer is an anode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode), and the second electrode layer is a cathode layer (Fig. 1(112): cathode, col. 5, lines 48-61). As to claim 13, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the electronic functional layer (Fig. 1(110): electron transport layer) comprises an electron transport layer, and a material of the electron transport layer comprises metal oxide (col. 7, lines 14-24). As to claim 14, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 13, wherein the metal oxide is selected from one or more of ZnO, SnO2, ITO, Fe2O3, Cr03, TiO2, W03, CdO, CuO, and MoO2 (col. 7, lines 14-24: ZnO and the like). As to claim 15, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein a material of the quantum dot light-emitting layer (Fig. 1(108): emissive layer contains emissive quantum dots) is selected from one or more of CdS, CdSe, CdTe, CdZnS, CdZnSe, CdSeS, ZnO, ZnS, ZnSe, ZnTe, ZnCdSe, GaAs, GaP, GaSb, HgS, HgSe, HgTe, InAs, InP, InSb, AlAs, AlP, CuInS, and CuInSe (col. 7, lines 31-51: one or more of: InP, CdSe, CdS, CdTe, ZnSe, ZnS, ZnTe, InAs, ZnO, MgO, HgS and the like). As to claim 16, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein from the step of forming the quantum dot light-emitting layer (Fig. 1(108): emissive layer contains emissive quantum dots) to the step of forming the second electrode layer, the whole process is in a reducing gas atmosphere (col. 5, lines 48-61, col. 3, lines 5-23: in an ambient environment by the oxygen scavengers reducing the amount of oxygen). As to claim 17, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein after the step of forming a second electrode layer on the electronic functional layer, the method further includes: encapsulating (col. 2, lines 33-36, col. 7, lines 44-53: quantum dots may each include a core, a shell around the core). As to claim 18, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein from the step of forming the quantum dot light-emitting layer to the step of encapsulating, the whole process is in a reducing gas atmosphere (col. 12, lines 52-62). As to claim 19, Hamilton teaches a display substrate (Fig. 1(102)), comprising a QLED device prepared by the preparation method for QLED device according to any one of claim 1 (Fig. 1, col. 2, lines 59-62: high resolution display applications; Note: it is well known that any display apparatus includes a display substrate). As to claim 20, Hamilton teaches a display apparatus comprising a display substrate according to claim 19 (Fig. 1, col. 2, lines 59-62: high resolution display applications; Note: it is well known that any display apparatus includes a display substrate). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hamilton et al. (US 10,985,336) in view of Chen et al. (US 20200313089). As to claim 2, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein a reductive gas catalyst is used (col. 3, lines 5-23: use of a suitable oxygen scavenger and blend composition; for example, the addition of Pt containing nanoparticles that will react with oxygen in place of emissive quantum dots). Hamilton does not explicitly teach the reductive gas is selected from one or more of CO, NO, H2, H2S, ethylene, and acetylene. Chen teaches the reductive gas is selected from one or more of CO, NO, H2, H2S, ethylene, and acetylene ([0046]: carbon dioxide (CO) or hydrogen (H2) as the reduced (reductive) gas). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hamilton’s preparation method for QLED device by incorporating Chen’s idea of using carbon dioxide (CO) or hydrogen (H2) as the reduced (reductive) gas in order to improve carrier electron mobility (see Chen: [0046]). As to claim 7, Hamilton teaches the method according to claim 5, wherein the step of forming a hole functional layer (Fig. 1(106): hole transport layer) on the first electrode layer (Fig. 1(104): anode) comprises: forming a hole injection layer or a hole transport layer on the first electrode layer (col. 3, lines 41-44: hole injection layer, col. 5, lines 48-61: hole transport layer). Hamilton does not expressly teach forming a hole injection layer and a hole transport layer on the first electrode layer sequentially. Chen teaches forming a hole injection layer and a hole transport layer on the first electrode layer sequentially (Fig. 4, [0072]: hole injection layer 20, hole transport layer 30). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hamilton’s preparation method for QLED device by adapting Chen’s idea of forming a hole injection layer and a hole transport layer on the first electrode layer sequentially in order to improve device efficiency, lower operating voltages, and increase device lifetime (see Chen: [0091]). As to claim 8, Hamilton (as modified by Chen) teach the method according to claim 7, wherein a material of the hole injection layer comprises one or more of PEDOT:PSS, MCC, CuPc, F4-TCNQ, HATCN, a transition metal oxide, and a transition metal chalcogenide (Hamilton: col. 6, lines 54-60: PEDOT:PSS, Chen: [0074]: PEDOT:PSS). As to claim 9, Hamilton (as modified by Chen) teach the method according to claim 7, wherein a material of the hole transport layer comprises one or more of PVK, Poly-TPD, CBP, TCTA, and TFB (Hamilton: col. 6, lines 54-60: Poly-TPD, Chen: [0074]: Poly-TPD). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AFROZA Y CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)270-1543. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nitin Patel can be reached at (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AFROZA CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591337
AGGREGATED LIKELIHOOD OF UNINTENTIONAL TOUCH INPUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588239
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ROUTING OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS OVER NEUTRALIZED POWER FETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585345
DETECTION DEVICE WITH THERMAL PROTECTION ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585353
TRACKPAD ACTUATOR CONFIGURATIONS FOR INPUT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581992
INSULATION MODULE AND GATE DRIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-6.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 816 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month