Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/565,338

MAGNETIC BEARING, FLYWHEEL DEVICE, AND ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM USING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Examiner
ELNAKIB, AHMED
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yu Wang
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
447 granted / 568 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
596
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 568 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-13 of U.S. Application No. 18/565338 filed on 11/29/2023 are presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/29/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 5-6, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Imlach (US 2002/0074881; Hereinafter, “Imlach”) figure 3 in view of the embodiment in figure 2. Regarding claim 1: Imlach discloses a magnetic bearing (10) comprising: a bearing rotor (20; fig. 2-3) provided between an outermost peripheral portion (annotated fig. 3 below) and an innermost peripheral portion of a flywheel (60) fixed to a rotating shaft (21) and rotating together with the rotating shaft (para [0021]), and firmly fixed to the flywheel (60) so as to rotate integrally with the flywheel (fig. 1-3); and PNG media_image1.png 781 672 media_image1.png Greyscale Imlach in fig. 3 does not show a bearing stator provided inside the bearing rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor includes a radially outer side magnet disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator includes a radially inner side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the radially outer side magnet and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet in a radial direction. Imlach discloses in fig. 2 a bearing stator (30) provided inside (radially inward with respect to the rotor) the bearing rotor (20; fig. 2) in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor (20) includes a radially outer side magnet (22) disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape (housing 21a; fig. 5), and the bearing stator (30) includes a radially inner side magnet (32,34) having the same magnetic pole (same arrow orientation is seen in fig. 2) as the radially outer side magnet (22) and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet (22) in a radial direction (fig. 2). PNG media_image2.png 439 632 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have formed the flywheel device of Imlach as seen in fig. 3 with the bearing stator provided inside the bearing rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor includes a radially outer side magnet disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator includes a radially inner side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the radially outer side magnet and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet in a radial direction as disclosed by Imlach as seen in fig. 2 to be able to use it in high speed applications (para [0030]). Regarding claim 3/1: Imlach discloses the limitations of claim 1 and further discloses that each of the radially outer side magnet (rotor magnet 22) and the radially inner side magnet (stator magnet 32, 34) is a magnet that generates an oriented magnetic field parallel (axial flux) to a thickness direction (axial thickness) of the magnet. Regarding claim 5/1: Imlach discloses the limitations of claim 1 and further discloses that a set of the bearing rotor (20) and the bearing stator (30) are provided on each of both one surface of the flywheel and the other surface opposite to the one surface (the upper and lower axial surfaces of the flywheel; fig. 3). Regarding claim 6: Imlach discloses flywheel device (fig. 3) comprising: a flywheel (60) fixed to a rotating shaft (21) and rotating together with the rotating shaft (para [0021]); a bearing rotor (20; fig. 2-3) provided between an outermost peripheral portion (annotated fig. 3 below) and an innermost peripheral portion of a flywheel (60) and firmly fixed to the flywheel (60) so as to rotate integrally with the flywheel (para [0021]); PNG media_image1.png 781 672 media_image1.png Greyscale Imlach in fig. 3 does not show a bearing stator provided inside the bearing rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor includes a radially outer side magnet disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator includes a radially inner side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the radially outer side magnet and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet in a radial direction. Imlach discloses in fig. 2 a bearing stator (30) provided inside (radially inward with respect to the rotor) the bearing rotor (20; fig. 2) in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor (20) includes a radially outer side magnet (22) disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape (housing 21a; fig. 5), and the bearing stator (30) includes a radially inner side magnet (32,34) having the same magnetic pole (same arrow orientation is seen in fig. 2) as the radially outer side magnet (22) and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet (22) in a radial direction (fig. 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have formed the flywheel device of Imlach as seen in fig. 3 with the bearing stator provided inside the bearing rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor includes a radially outer side magnet disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator includes a radially inner side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the radially outer side magnet and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet in a radial direction as disclosed by Imlach as seen in fig. 2 to be able to use it in high speed applications (para [0030]). Regarding claim 12/3: Imlach discloses the limitations of claim 3 and further discloses that a set of the bearing rotor (20) and the bearing stator (30) are provided on each of both one surface of the flywheel and the other surface opposite to the one surface (the upper and lower axial surfaces of the flywheel; fig. 3). Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Imlach fig. 3 in view of the embodiment in fig. 2 and in further view of Gabrys et al. (US 6798092; Hereinafter, “Gabrys”). Regarding claim 8: Imlach discloses an electric power generation system (motor/generator; para [0028]) comprising: PNG media_image1.png 781 672 media_image1.png Greyscale a flywheel device (60 and its support structure) supported by the rotating shaft (21), the flywheel device (fig. 3) comprising: a flywheel (60) fixed to a rotating shaft (21) and rotating together with the rotating shaft (para [0021]); a bearing rotor (20; fig. 2-3) provided between an outermost peripheral portion (annotated fig. 3 below) and an innermost peripheral portion of a flywheel (60) and firmly fixed to the flywheel (60) so as to rotate integrally with the flywheel (para [0021]); Imlach in fig. 3 does not show a bearing stator provided inside the bearing rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor includes a radially outer side magnet disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator includes a radially inner side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the radially outer side magnet and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet in a radial direction. Imlach discloses in fig. 2 a bearing stator (30) provided inside (radially inward with respect to the rotor) the bearing rotor (20; fig. 2) in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor (20) includes a radially outer side magnet (22) disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape (housing 21a; fig. 5), and the bearing stator (30) includes a radially inner side magnet (32,34) having the same magnetic pole (same arrow orientation is seen in fig. 2) as the radially outer side magnet (22) and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet (22) in a radial direction (fig. 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have formed the flywheel device of Imlach as seen in fig. 3 with the bearing stator provided inside the bearing rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating together with the flywheel, wherein the bearing rotor includes a radially outer side magnet disposed on an inner peripheral surface of a cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator includes a radially inner side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the radially outer side magnet and disposed at a position facing the radially outer side magnet in a radial direction as disclosed by Imlach as seen in fig. 2 to be able to use it in high speed applications (para [0030]). Imlach does not show the generator supported by a rotating shaft; and wherein the generator includes an electric power generation rotor fixed to the rotating shaft and rotating together with the rotating shaft; and an electric power generation stator provided inside the electric power generation rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating integrally with the electric power generation rotor. Gabrys teaches forming the generator (107; fig. 4) to be supported by a rotating shaft (105, 106); and wherein the generator includes an electric power generation rotor (magnets 104) fixed to the rotating shaft (104, 105) and rotating together with the rotating shaft; and an electric power generation stator (114) provided inside the electric power generation rotor (104) in a fixed state instead of rotating integrally with the electric power generation rotor (fig. 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have formed the power generation device of Imlach with the generator supported by a rotating shaft; and wherein the generator includes an electric power generation rotor fixed to the rotating shaft and rotating together with the rotating shaft; and an electric power generation stator provided inside the electric power generation rotor in a fixed state instead of rotating integrally with the electric power generation rotor as disclosed by Gabrys to provide a compact structure that saves on space. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 4, 10-11, 13, 7 and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2/1: the limitations of claim 1, “…wherein the bearing rotor further includes a wheel proximal side magnet disposed on a bottom surface of the cylindrical shape, and the bearing stator further includes a wheel distal side magnet having the same magnetic pole as the wheel proximal side magnet and disposed at a position facing the wheel proximal side magnet in an axial direction” in the combination as claimed are neither anticipated nor obvious over the prior arts in record, claims 4, 10-11, and 13 are also objected-to as they depend on claim 2. Claims 7, and 9 recite similar language as that of claim 2, and therefore objected-to for the same reasons Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED ELNAKIB whose telephone number is (571)270-0638. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED ELNAKIB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601373
REFRIGERANT COMPRESSOR INCLUDING GROOVED AUXILIARY BEARING INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597816
ROTOR, PERMANENT MAGNET MOTOR AND POWERTRAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584521
HYBRID AIRFOIL BEARING WITH ACTIVE DAMPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587064
ELECTRIC MOTOR SYSTEM, TURBO COMPRESSOR, AND REFRIGERATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587071
DRIVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 568 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month