Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/565,386

LAMINATE AND FROZEN FOOD CONTAINER AND PACKAGING

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 29, 2023
Examiner
MIGGINS, MICHAEL C
Art Unit
1782
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Earth Create Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
806 granted / 999 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1043
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “the first polyethylene resin”, “the second polyethylene resin” and “the third polyethylene resin” in the last paragraph of claim 1. However, “the first polyethylene resin” is only first recited in Condition A. If condition B is chosen, there is a lack of antecedent basis for “the first polyethylene resin” because “the first polyethylene resin” is only first recited in Condition A. Conversely, “the second polyethylene resin” and “the third polyethylene resin” are first mentioned in Condition B. If condition A is chosen, there is a lack of antecedent basis for “the second polyethylene resin” and “the third polyethylene resin” because “the second polyethylene resin” and “the third polyethylene resin” are first mentioned in Condition B. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2016-198998 (English machine translation provided herein) in view of JP2002-361811 (English machine translation provided herein). JP2016-198998 a laminate, comprising an inner layer and a pair of outer layers laminated on both sides of the inner layer, wherein the inner layer contains an inorganic filler and a first thermoplastic resin, each of the outer layers contains a second thermoplastic resin, the inorganic filler includes calcium carbonate particles, a content of the inorganic filler in the laminate by ratio is more than 50% by mass, wherein a total content, by ratio, of the first polyethylene resin (HDPE), the second polyethylene resin, and the third polyethylene resin in each of the first thermoplastic resin and the second thermoplastic resin is more than 90% by mass (since the first, second resins and third resins in layers A and B are polyethylene) (paragraphs [0016-0018], [0020], [0022], [0025], [0030-0033], [0035], [0037-0039], [0054-0057]). JP2016-198998 wherein a first polyethylene resin is contained, and the first polyethylene resin is 0.942 g/cm.sup.3 or more and 0.970 g/cm.sup.3 or less in density as well as 2.0 or more and 10.0 or less in polydispersity index (Mw/Mn). JP2002-361811 disclose an HDPE having a density which is 0.942 g/cm.sup.3 or more and 0.970 g/cm.sup.3 or less as well as 2.0 or more and 10.0 or less in polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) for use in packaging for the purpose of providing good moldability and improved transparency and impact resistance in a film for packaging (paragraph [0001], [0026-0035]). Both references are drawn to polyethylene films used in packaging. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was made to have provided wherein a first polyethylene resin is contained, and the first polyethylene resin is 0.942 g/cm.sup.3 or more and 0.970 g/cm.sup.3 or less in density as well as 2.0 or more and 10.0 or less in polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) in JP2016-198998 in order to provide good moldability and improved transparency and impact resistance as taught or suggested by JP2002-361811. JP2016-198998 discloses wherein a total thickness of the laminate is 200 μm or more and 1000 μm or less, wherein a ratio of each thickness of the outer layers to a total thickness of the laminate is 2.0% or more and 20.0% or less (measuring the three layer structure of Fig. 2 shows the overall thickness to be 10mm and each of the outer layers is 2mm, each layer 2 is 20%), wherein a content of the inorganic filler in the inner layer by ratio is 53% by mass or more and 70% by mass or less, wherein the total content, by ratio, of the first polyethylene resin, the second polyethylene resin, and the third polyethylene resin in each of the first thermoplastic resin and the second thermoplastic resin is 100% by mass (since the first, second resins and third resins in layers A and B are polyethylene) (paragraphs [0016-0018], [0020], [0022], [0025], [0030-0033], [0035], [0037-0039], [0054-0057] and Fig. 2). Claim(s) 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2016-198998 (English machine translation provided herein) in view of JP2002-361811 (English machine translation provided herein) and CN102909925. JP2016-198998 a laminate, comprising an inner layer and a pair of outer layers laminated on both sides of the inner layer, wherein the inner layer contains an inorganic filler and a first thermoplastic resin, each of the outer layers contains a second thermoplastic resin, the inorganic filler includes calcium carbonate particles, a content of the inorganic filler in the laminate by ratio is more than 50% by mass, wherein a total content, by ratio, of the first polyethylene resin (HDPE), the second polyethylene resin, and the third polyethylene resin in each of the first thermoplastic resin and the second thermoplastic resin is more than 90% by mass (since the first, second resins and third resins in layers A and B are polyethylene) (paragraphs [0016-0018], [0020], [0022], [0025], [0030-0033], [0035], [0037-0039], [0054-0057]). JP2016-198998 wherein a first polyethylene resin is contained, and the first polyethylene resin is 0.942 g/cm.sup.3 or more and 0.970 g/cm.sup.3 or less in density as well as 2.0 or more and 10.0 or less in polydispersity index (Mw/Mn). JP2002-361811 disclose an HDPE having a density which is 0.942 g/cm.sup.3 or more and 0.970 g/cm.sup.3 or less as well as 2.0 or more and 10.0 or less in polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) for use in packaging for the purpose of providing good moldability and improved transparency and impact resistance in a film for packaging (paragraph [0001], [0026-0035]). Both references are drawn to polyethylene films used in packaging. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was made to have provided wherein a first polyethylene resin is contained, and the first polyethylene resin is 0.942 g/cm.sup.3 or more and 0.970 g/cm.sup.3 or less in density as well as 2.0 or more and 10.0 or less in polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) in JP2016-198998 in order to provide good moldability and improved transparency and impact resistance as taught or suggested by JP2002-361811. JP2016-198998 discloses wherein a total thickness of the laminate is 200 μm or more and 1000 μm or less, wherein a ratio of each thickness of the outer layers to a total thickness of the laminate is 2.0% or more and 20.0% or less (measuring the three layer structure of Fig. 2 shows the overall thickness to be 10mm and each of the outer layers is 2mm, each layer 2 is 20%), wherein a content of the inorganic filler in the inner layer by ratio is 53% by mass or more and 70% by mass or less, wherein the total content, by ratio, of the first polyethylene resin, the second polyethylene resin, and the third polyethylene resin in each of the first thermoplastic resin and the second thermoplastic resin is 100% by mass (since the first, second resins and third resins in layers A and B are polyethylene) (paragraphs [0016-0018], [0020], [0022], [0025], [0030-0033], [0035], [0037-0039], [0054-0057] and Fig. 2). JP2016-198998 does not disclose a frozen food container. CN102909925 discloses the use of polyethylene films in frozen food containers in order to prevent pollution, corrosion resistance etc. (paragraphs [0003-0005). Therefore it would have been obvious to have used the polyethylene film of 2016-198998 in a frozen food container in order to provide pollution prevention, corrosion resistance etc. as taught or suggested by CN102909925. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL C MIGGINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1494. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 1-9 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aaron Austin can be reached at 571-272-8935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL C MIGGINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1782 MCM January 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 11, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 17, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590652
THIN-WALLED HEAT SHRINK TUBING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589881
Co-Cured UV/Visible Light-Resistant Coated Composite Material for Aircraft Wing Fuel Tank Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590653
FUEL HOSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583989
BIODEGRADABLE COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES FORMED THEREFROM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577022
PACKAGING BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month