Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/565,646

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ISSUING OR INVALIDATING DIGITAL ATTRIBUTE CERTIFICATES

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Nov 30, 2023
Examiner
CHEN, GEORGE YUNG CHIEH
Art Unit
3628
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Map My Skills Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 4m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
208 granted / 435 resolved
-4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
468
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 435 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is a final action in response to amendment filed on 12/06/2025. Claims 1-12, 15-19, 22-24 are pending. Response to Argument Applicant’s argument directed to 101 rejection has been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the use of blockchain is not merely a generic computer but is leveraged due to its technical property to improve traditional system. Examiner respectfully disagrees. In this case, with the exception of storing data, everything else occurs outside the block chain. The block chain is merely used to store data (e.g., outcome of abstract idea performed). While there are advantages to store data on a block chain, these advantages (e.g., trust, immutability, verification) are just the outcome of the putting data on a block chain, as well as being inherent to using block chain to store data. See MPEP 2106.05(f) (1) and (2). Examiner recommends involving block chain in a more active and detailed manner to demonstrate this alleged advantage beyond merely generally linking the abstract idea on a computer or merely implementing the abstract idea on a generic computer. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-12, 15-19, 22-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because they recite an abstract idea without significantly more. Using claim 1 as a representative example, the analysis is provided below. Step 2A prong 1 Each of the independent claims, with the exception of block chain database, all the body of the claims are limitations examiner believes to recite an abstract idea. Generally, these limitations describes a series of rules to establish various interpersonal relationship among various entities. They would fall into certain method of organizing human activities. Therefore, each and every one of the independent claims recite an abstract idea. Step 2A prong 2 As noted above, the only additional element in the independent claims is block chain database that is used to store data. This is merely generally linking the abstract idea to a particularly field of use, as well as merely using the word “apply-it” to implement the abstract idea on a generic computer. Whenever viewed individually or as an ordered combination, such additional element would not integrate the abstract idea into practical application. Step 2B As noted above in step 2A prong 2, of which the same analysis can still apply in step 2B, the additional elements, whether viewed individually or as an ordered combination, are merely generally linking the abstract idea into a particular field of use. This wouldn’t provide significantly more to an abstract idea either. Therefore, the independent claims are not eligible. The dependent claims, as well as the other claim sets, merely further limit the abstract idea by providing more context or rules to be followed or can be analyzed similarly as above, therefore, they all still recite the same abstract idea and step 2A prong 2 and step 2B analysis would remain substantially the same. These claims are not eligible either. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12, 15-19, 22-24 would be allowable if the above 112 and 101 rejection are overcome. Best prior art Guo (US 20200396089) discloses using consensus to determine if digital certificate should be recorded. Guo, however, lack the pledging step as required by all the independent claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GEORGE CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5499. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30 AM -5:00 PM Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Resha Desai can be reached at 571-270-7792. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GEORGE CHEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3628 /GEORGE CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Dec 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §101
Mar 09, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586013
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR JOINT OPTIMIZATION OF ASSIGNMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579503
NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE RELIABILITY SCORES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12561699
SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE ENERGY BALANCING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12547135
OPTIMIZATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TURBINES OF THERMAL POWER UNIT BASED ON SPARSE BIG DATA MINING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12518328
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING IMAGE-BASED PROPERTY RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPROVED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+35.1%)
4y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 435 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month