Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/566,412

METHOD FOR HEATING A FURNACE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner
WILSON, GREGORY A
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Linde GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
965 granted / 1181 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1210
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1181 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The following guidelines illustrate the preferred layout for the specification of a utility application. These guidelines are suggested for the applicant’s use. Arrangement of the Specification As provided in 37 CFR 1.77(b), the specification of a utility application should include the following sections in order. Each of the lettered items should appear in upper case, without underlining or bold type, as a section heading. If no text follows the section heading, the phrase “Not Applicable” should follow the section heading: (a) TITLE OF THE INVENTION. (b) CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS. (c) STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT. (d) THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES TO A JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT. (e) INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A READ-ONLY OPTICAL DISC, AS A TEXT FILE OR AN XML FILE VIA THE PATENT ELECTRONIC SYSTEM. (f) STATEMENT REGARDING PRIOR DISCLOSURES BY THE INVENTOR OR A JOINT INVENTOR. (g) BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION. (1) Field of the Invention. (2) Description of Related Art including information disclosed under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. (h) BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION. (i) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S). (j) DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION. (k) CLAIM OR CLAIMS (commencing on a separate sheet). (l) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE (commencing on a separate sheet). (m) SEQUENCE LISTING. (See MPEP § 2422.03 and 37 CFR 1.821 - 1.825). A “Sequence Listing” is required on paper if the application discloses a nucleotide or amino acid sequence as defined in 37 CFR 1.821(a) and if the required “Sequence Listing” is not submitted as an electronic document either on read-only optical disc or as a text file via the patent electronic system. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by Hanzawa et al (2007/0054229) or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Hanzawa et al in view of Sarres et al (2011/0115137). Hanzawa et al discloses a furnace and degreasing method that includes a furnace having an inner space (20) and an outer chamber (2) wherein the outer chamber at least partly surrounds the inner space, wherein a fuel (12b) is combusted with an oxidant at (12) to produce combustion gases, wherein the combustion gases are passed through the outer chamber (via 22) wherein the fuel is combusted with the oxidant in a combustion chamber which is external to the furnace (SEE Figures 1 & 4), in that the combustion gases are recirculated from the outer chamber to the combustion chamber (via outlet 21), alternatively, Sarres et al teaches similar furnaces (1) which include an inner chamber (3) and an outer chamber (2) wherein a product is arranged within the inner chamber which is fed with process gas while the space between the inner chamber and the outer chamber is fed with a heated gas to provide uniformity of heating and cooling of the product within the inner chamber. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the applicants claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the subject matter pertains to have arranged an inner cover as was commonly known in the art and taught by Sarres et al within the outer chamber of Hanzawa et al as a way of indirectly heating a product uniformly. In re claim 2, Hanzawa et al discloses that a process gas that is introduced into the inner chamber is preheated by the indirect heat exchange with the combustion gases from (combustion chamber 12a) entering via opening (22). In re claim 3, Hanzawa et al discloses wherein the oxidant (13) comprises at least 30% by volume oxygen, at least 50% by volume oxygen, or at least 80% by volume oxygen, preferably more than 90% by volume oxygen, preferably more than 98% by volume oxygen (SEE [0011]). In re claim 4, it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to modify the heating assembly of Hanzawa et al by including a flameless combustion, since the applicant has not disclosed that having a flameless combustion solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose and it appears that the furnace of Hanzawa et al or alternatively, Hanzawa as modified by Sarres et al would perform equally well with any number of heating elements. In re claim 5, Hanzawa et al further discloses that the combustion gases are recirculated by means of a fan (3b). In re claim 6, Hanzawa et al further discloses that the combustion gases are cooled upstream of the fan (3b) via heat exchanger (4). In re claim 8, Hanzawa et al further discloses a controller (9) and multiple openings (7a) such that the pressure of the recirculated combustion gases can be controlled by withdrawing a part of the combustion gases from the recirculated combustion gas stream (SEE Figures 1 & 5). In re claim 9, Hanzawa et al implicitly discloses that the temperature of the recirculated combustion gases can be controlled by adding combustion gases in the combustion chamber (SEE [0068]). In re claim 10, Hanzawa et al implicitly discloses that the outer chamber (2) has two or more inlet openings (as evidenced by 7a, SEE Figure 1) and that the combustion gases are distributed to at least two of the inlet openings. In re claim 11, Hanzawa et al as modified by Sarres et al would meet the limitations of the applicants claimed invention since Sarres et al teaches that it is commonly known in the art for a furnace is a bell furnace (the retort furnace is a bell furnace) with a base (10.1), an inner hood and an outer hood (SEE Figure 2) and wherein the base and the inner hood define the inner chamber (6) and wherein the base and the outer hood define the outer chamber (6.1). In re claim 12, Hanzawa et al inherently discloses that the fuel and oxidant are continuously combusted (SEE [0082]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY A WILSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4882. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 7:00am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steve McAllister can be reached at 571-272-6785. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY A WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762 February 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595965
CHILLING UNIT, HEAT TREATMENT APPARATUS INCLUDING SAME, AND HEAT TREATMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595962
CATHODE MATERIAL DRYING DEVICE AND CATHODE MATERIAL DRYING PRODUCTION LINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595906
THERMAL REGENERATIVE FLUID PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584655
Pressure Water Heater
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578743
COOLING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DECOATERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1181 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month