Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/566,534

BENZIMIDAZOLE COMPOUND OR SALT THEREOF, CANINE FILARIASIS CONTROL AGENT CONTAINING SAME, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner
SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Nihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
37 granted / 69 resolved
-6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+51.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 69 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority The present Application, filed December 1, 2023, is a national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2022/022536, filed June 2, 2022, which claims priority to Japanese Patent Application Nos. JP20212-021145 and JP2021-092795, filed February 15, 2022 and June 2, 2021, respectively. Status of the Claims In the amendment filed December 1, 2023, claims new claims 5-8 are added, and claims 3-4 are amended. Claims 1-8 are currently pending. Information Disclosure Statement The three information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on February 20, 2024, November 5, 2024, and January 9, 2025 are acknowledged. Claim Objections An objection is raised to claim 1: Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim recites, “Y1, Y2, and Y3 are all represent (c1) a hydrogen atom,” at line 42. This is syntactically incorrect, as it includes two verbs (“are” and “represent”) where there should be only one. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 5 are anticipated by Savall: Claims 1-3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by the non-patent publication, Synthesis of 2-arylbenzimidazoles via microwave Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of unprotected 2-chlorobenzimidazoles, Tetrahed. Lett., 49, pgs. 6667-6669 (2008) by Savall et al. (hereinafter, “Savall”). Claim 1 is directed to compounds of Formula 1 PNG media_image1.png 102 292 media_image1.png Greyscale where the nine variable groups (R, R1, X, Y1-Y3, and Z1-Z4) are defined according to a defined number of alternative base moieties, most of which have a number of sub-alternatives. Claim 2 recites a compound of claim 1, where fewer alternative base moieties for Y1-Y3 and X are permitted. Savall discloses the synthesis of a series of 2-arylbenzimidazoles via microwave-mediated Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of 2-chlorobenzimidazoles to either arylboronic acids or aryltrifluoroborate salts (Abstract). The test reactions focused on synthesis of the 2-methoxy pyridyl derivative (see, e.g. Table 5). PNG media_image2.png 468 343 media_image2.png Greyscale Above: Table 5 of Savall. Each of the reaction products shown in Table 5 of Savall is a compound of instant claims 1 and 2. For example, the first listed product, where R is exclusively hydrogen, is a compound of instant claim 2 where R1 is methyl (C1 alkyl) and each of Y1-Y3, R, and Z1-Z4 is hydrogen. Claims 1-2 are therefore anticipated. Claims 3 and 5 recite a canine filariasis control agent for an animal, comprising the benzimidazole compound or a salt thereof according to claim 1 or claim 2, respectively, as an active ingredient. In the instance of claims 3 and 5, the preambular recitation of a “canine filariasis control agent for an animal” is not afforded patentable weight and is not regarded as further limiting the invention. This preambular recitation does not clearly limit the compositional makeup of the agent in any way, and is thus regarded as a mere statement of purpose or intended use. As such, claim 3 is regarded as effectively being directed only to a benzimidazole compound or salt thereof according to claim 1 or claim 2. Savall thus anticipates claims 3 and 5 for the same reason as described above for claims 1 and 2. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 6-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 4 and 6-8 are directed to various methods of using a canine filariasis control agent for an animal, or of controlling canine filariasis, all involving a step of administering an effective amount of a benzimidazole compound of claim 1 or claim 2 to the animal. Savall, which is directed to chemical synthetic methods, neither teaches nor suggests administration of a disclosed benzimidazole compound to an animal. It is noted, however, that while claims 1 and 2, as presently written, encompass a very large number of compounds (conservatively, well into the millions), the instant disclosure expressly provides in vitro evidence of anti-filarial activity for only twelve of them, and those twelve do not necessarily exemplify the full scope of structural variation within the genera of claims 1 and 2. While this scenario would potentially raise an issue under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a), no evidence has been found in the art to suggest that variation of the substituents on the benzimidazole core structure would be likely to abrogate anthelmintic activity generally, or anti-filarial activity specifically. For this reason, no rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) are entered at this time. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER K SHOWALTER whose telephone number is (571)270-0610. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 am to 5:00 pm, eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey S Lundgren can be reached on (571) 272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER K. SHOWALTER/Examiner, Art Unit 1629 /JEFFREY S LUNDGREN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590065
LEVORPHANOL PRODRUGS AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING AND USING THEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583884
3beta-(benzyloxy)-17alpha-methyl-pregn-5-en-20-one for use in the treatment of cognitive disorders
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582634
SYNTHETIC METHODS FOR PREPARATION OF 4-(2-CHLORO-4-METHOXY-5-METHYLPHENYL)-N-[(1S)-2-CYCLOPROPYL-1-(3-FLUORO-4-METHYLPHENYL)ETHYL]-5-METHYL-N-PROP-2-YNYL-1,3-THIAZOL-2-AMINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12528794
A NOVEL MAO-B INHIBITOR DRG-MAOB-1 FOR USE IN TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12479866
BORON-CONTAINING RHO KINASE INHIBITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+51.6%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 69 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month