Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/567,838

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LIQUID RECOVERY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Priority
Oct 11, 2022 — provisional 63/415,159 +1 more
Examiner
GRAVINI, STEPHEN MICHAEL
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Exothermics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1270 granted / 1623 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1653
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.9%
+21.9% vs TC avg
§102
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1623 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 1-8 and 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on June 3, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “a collection pot, wherein the collection pan is in fluid connection with the collection pan” reiterates a redundant repetitive feature since th pan is in fluid connection with a pan. Since claims 10-15 depend upon an indefinite claim, those claims are construed to be indefinite by dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-15 are allowable over the prior art or record because the liquid recovery system with all the independently claimed features including a vacuum chamber exposing a preheated vessel to between 100 to 140 Torr for a time period extracting liquid of interest from a material is not found in the prior art either singly or in combination. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Other prior art references cited with this action, may teach one or more claim features, but do not rise to a level of anticipation, obviousness, and/or double patenting such that a rejection would be proper or reasonable or proper under current Office practice and procedure. References A, M, cited with this action, are patent publications from the same inventive entity as the current application. References B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, cited with this action teach liquid removal methods and systems thereof. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN MICHAEL GRAVINI whose telephone number is (571)272-4875. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 5:30 am to 5:00 (mid day flex) first F 6:00 am t0 11:00 am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider can be reached at 571 272 3607. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHEN M GRAVINI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680219
ENERGY HARVESTING SYSTEM USING DRYER EXHAUST AIR TO GENERATE ELECTRICITY
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680756
Electrode Sheet Drying Apparatus Capable of Preventing Thermal Wrinkles in Non-Coated Portion
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663448
VOLTAGE PHASE DETECTION FOR A LAUNDRY APPLIANCE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662772
Laundry Appliance With Heat Pump Having Improved Evaporator Efficiency
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654361
PROCESS FOR DEODORIZATION OF RECYCLED POLYOLEFIN PELLETS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1623 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month