Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/567,945

ELECTROMAGNETIC ABSORBER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Priority
Jun 17, 2021 — JP PCT/JP2021/023045 +1 more
Examiner
KOSLOW, CAROL M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tohoku University
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1805 granted / 2211 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
2230
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2211 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Response to Amendment This action is in response to applicants’ amendment of 28 August 2026. The substitute specification filed 28 August 2026 has entered and overcome the objections to the subject matter of paragraphs [0015, [0020] and [0030] and the meaning of “two-phase separation surface”. The amendments to the specification, especially the teachings in paragraph [0042], make it clear that “two-phase separation surface” is what is conventional known in the art as the two-phase separation boundary line in a ternary phase diagram. The amendments to the claims have overcome the previous 35 USC 112b) rejection. The substitute specification did not overcome the objection with respect to the paragraph numbering and the amendment to claim 9 has created a new 35 USC 112(b) issue. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In the specification, some of the paragraphs are numbered and others are not. Thus the paragraphs in the specification are not numbered consecutively. Appropriate correction is required. Response to Arguments The substitute specification filed 28 August 2026 nor did applicants’ argument address this objection. Thus it is maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. This claim has been amended to teach spinodal decomposition is caused by holding the powder at a temperature equal or lower than that of a two-phase separation surface of a ternary phase diagram. This newly added limitation is indefinite as to which ternary phase diagram having a two-phase separation surface is being used to calculate the temperature. The newly added phase of “a ternary phase diagram” does not limit the ternary phase diagram to any specific ternary composition. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 10 are allowed. Claim 9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. These claims are and would be allowable for the reasons given in the previous action. Conclusion Applicants’ amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to C. MELISSA KOSLOW whose telephone number is (571)272-1371. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tues:7:45-3:45 EST;Thurs-Fri:6:30-2:00EST; and Wed:7:45-2:00EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C Melissa Koslow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734 cmk 9/10/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 28, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751118
Display Device
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735631
LIGHT-EMITTING COMPOSITION COMPRISING AN ORGANOSILOXANE SOLVENT AND PEROVSKITE NANOPARTICLES, AND A METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735629
PHOSPHORESCENT ELASTOMER MASTER MIXTURE AND HOROLOGICAL COMPONENT COMPRISING SUCH A MIXTURE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735639
PHOSPHOR POWDER, WAVELENGTH CONVERSION BODY, AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12713832
FLEXIBLE AND LOW COST PIEZOELECTRIC COMPOSITES WITH HIGH D33 VALUES
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 2211 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month