Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/568,048

METHOD FOR DETECTING CONTACTS ON A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Priority
Jun 16, 2021 — DE 10 2021 206 166.4 +1 more
Examiner
ZHONG, XIN Y
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
482 granted / 631 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 2/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding Applicant’s argument that Kimura converts each acceleration signal into magnitude-based energy values (fHL, fLL, fHR, fLR) by filtering, rectifying, and integrating the signals, and then compares ratios of those energy values to make a deformation determination. The energy and ratios of energy remain dependent on signal amplitude and therefore are not signal-strength-independent properties of the signals themselves. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Paragraph 17 of the present publication states “for each sensor, signal strength-independent properties, such as the frequency, that describe the properties of the contact are determined”, therefore, the signal strength-independent property is the frequency of the acceleration signal. Kimura also teaches use frequency of the acceleration signal to detect the contact (Column 20, lines 1-45, “The side deformation determination process which uses a pair of acceleration sensors mounted on either side of a vehicle body (multiple point type 1) can be carried out by comparing the frequency components of the left system and the right system (fLL, fHL, fLR and fHR) obtained by the frequency analysis according to the prescribed determination logic”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kimura et al. (U.S. Patent No. 6018980). Regarding claim 11, Kimura teaches a method for detecting a contact on a vehicle, the method comprising the following steps: evaluating and comparing acceleration signals from at least two sensors to one another (Column 20, lines 1-45, “The side deformation determination process which uses a pair of acceleration sensors mounted on either side of a vehicle body (multiple point type 1) can be carried out by comparing the frequency components of the left system and the right system (fLL, fHL, fLR and fHR) obtained by the frequency analysis according to the prescribed determination logic”), wherein at least one signal strength-independent property of the signals is taken into account (Column 20, lines 1-45, “comparing the frequency components”); and detecting the contact on the vehicle based on the evaluation and comparison (Column 20, lines 1-45, “The side deformation determination process”). Regarding claim 12, Kimura teaches wherein a frequency of each of the signals is acquired as the signal strength-independent property of the signals (Column 20, lines 1-45, “comparing the frequency components”). Regarding claim 13, Kimura teaches wherein the method is used to detect a contact which results in minor damage (Column 5, line 63 to column 5, line 4, “this determination logic allows a time interval involving an intrusion (side deformation) and a time interval not involving an intrusion to be accurately distinguished according to the differences between the distributions of frequency components”, no intrusion is a minor damage). Regarding claim 14, Kimura teaches wherein a frequency is taken into account as at least one property of the at least one signal strength-independent property (Column 20, lines 1-45, “comparing the frequency components”) Regarding claim 15, Kimura teaches in which a first sensor and a second sensor are used (Column 20, lines 1-45). Regarding claim 16, Kimura teaches wherein the first sensor and the second sensor are mounted on opposite sides of the vehicle (Column 20, lines 1-45). Regarding claim 17, Kimura teaches wherein further sensors are used (As shown in Fig.11, RU, LU and CU). Regarding claim 18, Kimura teaches wherein a relative signal strength ascertainment is carried out (Column 10, lines 52-67). Regarding claims 19-20, the claims are commensurate in scope with the above claim 11, and are rejected for the same reasons as set forth above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIN Y ZHONG whose telephone number is (571)272-3798. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Deherrera can be reached at 303-297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIN Y ZHONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 18, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704488
MASS SPECTROMETRY SYSTEM, PROCESSING DEVICE, AND ANOMALY DETECTION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704480
SUPPORT BED FOR IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695001
Photonically Multiplexed Optical Measurement Apparatus and Performing Optical Multiplexing
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693271
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ULTRASONIC TESTING USING TEMPORAL SPARSE FIRING
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693270
SYSTEM FOR MONITORING CONTAINERS OR PIPES IN WHICH AT LEAST TWO PHASES OR AT LEAST TWO MEDIA OF ONE PHASE IN THE FORM OF A LIQUID, A GAS AND/OR A SOLID ARE STORED OR TRANSPORTED TOGETHER
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month