Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/569,178

CANCER THERAPIES COMPRISING PEPTIDE LOADED CXCR3- AND CCR5-INDUCING DENDRITIC CELLS AND CHEMOKINE MODULATORY AGENTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 11, 2023
Priority
Jun 16, 2021 — provisional 63/211,150 +1 more
Examiner
JACKSON III, WALTER
Art Unit
1638
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-60.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
16
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§103
87.5%
+47.5% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 19 – 21 in the reply filed on June 1, 2026, is acknowledged. Claims 1 – 18 and 22 – 31 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on June 1, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 19 – 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20170173130; cited on IDS, hereinafter Yu) in view of Lee et al. (Type 1-polarized dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor are a potent immunogen against chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Type 1-polarized dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor are a potent immunogen against chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Leukoc Biol. 2008 Jul;84(1):319-25; hereinafter Lee). Regarding claims 19 – 21, Yu discloses isolating a population of dendritic cells (DC) (para. [0075]) having loaded thereon a peptide that has 100% identity to SEQ ID NO: 1 of the instant application (para. [0020], SEQ ID NO: 7, KIFGSLAFL). Yu does not explicitly disclose that the dendritic cells are “alpha”. However, Lee discloses the motivation for using a type 1 alpha (α) DC, which was engineered to cross-present (Abstract) the antigens expressed by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells, is to induce antigen-specific, functional cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Lee further discloses that the DCs are engineered to be “nonexhausted” (p. 322, Elevated, rather than “exhausted,”…) after maturation. Regarding claim 21, Yu discloses pharmaceutical compositions in various embodiments (para. [0094] – [0097]). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the HER2 peptide of Yu with the ex vivo-generated α-DCs of Lee in order to treat HER2+ breast cancer. Doing so would improve the efficacy of the treatment, as nonexhausted α-DCs are potent inducers of antigen-specific T cells, according to Lee. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WALTER JACKSON III whose telephone number is (571)272-0247. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00A - 5:00P. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tracy Vivlemore can be reached at 571-272-2914. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WALTER JACKSON III/Examiner, Art Unit 1638 /Tracy Vivlemore/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month