Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/569,522

DYNAMIC SELECTION OF LOCATION MEASUREMENT TIME-DOMAIN WINDOWS FOR POSITIONING

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Priority
Jul 13, 2021 — GR 20210100466 +1 more
Examiner
PATEL, CHANDRAHAS B
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
804 granted / 909 resolved
+30.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 909 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/10/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Zhang does not teach amended claims. However, examiner disagrees. Amended claims are discussed below as taught by Zhang in the rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-6, 8-10, 12-19, 21, 22 and 24-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (USPN 12,256,246). Regarding claim 1, Zhang teaches a method performed by a target user equipment for performing positioning, the method comprising: receiving a control message from a network entity, the control message identifying a type of a measurement report and a set of measurement time windows in which to perform measurements of one or more signals [Col. 13, lines 45-52, measurement gap configuration message identifies measurement gaps which are measurement time windows], the set of measurement time windows being associated with the type of the measurement report [Col. 29, line 49 – Col. 30, line 15, measurement time period is associated with the type of measurement to be done]; performing the measurements of the one or more signals within the set of measurement time windows [Col. 13, lines 53-67, performs measurement in the measurement time gap/window]; and transmitting the measurement report to the network entity, the measurement report comprising the measurements of the one or more signals performed within the set of measurement time windows [Col. 20, lines 27-43, measurement report is transmitted once measurement is completed]. Regarding claims 2 and 30, Zhang teaches accessing a table that includes a set of measurement time windows [Fig. 4, measurement gap is selected from a set of configured gaps]. Regarding claims 3 and 31, Zhang teaches receiving an initial control message from the network entity that includes an initial set of measurement time windows, wherein the set of measurement time windows are selected from the initial set of measurement time windows [Col. 18, lines 22-64, measurement gaps are preconfigured using control message]. Regarding claims 4 and 32, Zhang teaches sending a capability message indicating that the target user equipment supports receiving the initial control message that identifies the initial set of measurement time windows [Col. 18, lines 22-35, sends information about available time-frequency resources to configure measurement gaps]. Regarding claims 5 and 33, Zhang teaches at least one measurement time window of the set of measurement time windows corresponds to a measurement gap [Col. 13, lines 45-52]. Regarding claims 6 and 34, Zhang teaches at least one measurement time window of the set of measurement time windows is associated with multiple component carriers [Fig. 4]. Regarding claims 8 and 24, Zhang teaches a base station [Fig. 1, Network device]; and the control message comprises a Downlink Control Information message [Col. 20, lines 1-8]. Regarding claim 9, Zhang teaches identifies component carriers or bands on which the set of measurement time windows are scheduled [Col. 20, lines 1-26]. Regarding claim 10, Zhang teaches a Reference Signal Time Difference (RSTD) measurement; a Reference Signal Received Power measurement; a roundtrip time measurement; an Angle-of-Departure (AoD) measurement; a phase-difference based measurement; a line-of-sight (LOS) identifier; a non-line-of-sight (NLOS) identifier; a power delay profile measurement; or any combination thereof [Col. 14, line 64 – Col. 15, line 8]. Regarding claims 12, 25 and 38, Zhang teaches a position of a measurement request field in the control message identifies the type of the measurement report from a plurality of types of measurement reports [Col. 19, lines 55-65]. Regarding claims 13, 26, 35 and 39, Zhang teaches each measurement time window of the set of measurement time windows is specified using an absolute time window [Fig. 4]. Regarding claims 14, 27, 36 and 40, Zhang teaches each measurement time window of the set of measurement time windows is specified using a start time relative to reception of the control message or relative to a slot carrying the control message [Fig. 4]. Regarding claim 15, Zhang teaches a slot-offset-start and either a slot-offset-end or a duration [Fig. 4]. Regarding claim 16, Zhang teaches the slot-offset-start is specified relative to a slot carrying the control message, relative to a fixed frame boundary, or relative to a subframe boundary [Col. 15, lines 18-51]. Regarding claim 17, Zhang teaches an instance-offset-start and either an instance-offset-end or a number-of-instances. relative to the control message [Fig. 4]. Regarding claim 18, Zhang teaches the number-of-instances relative to the control message corresponds to available slots [Fig. 4]. Regarding claim 19, Zhang teaches the available slots are configured using semi-static downlink signaling [Col. 20, lines 1-8]. Regarding claim 21, Zhang teaches the target user equipment prioritizes performing the measurements of the one or more signals within the set of measurement time windows over other measurement time windows signaled via higher layer signaling [Col. 13, lines 53-67]. Regarding claim 22, Zhang teaches a method performed by a network entity for performing positioning, the method comprising: sending a control message to a target user equipment, the control message identifying a type of a measurement report and a set of measurement time windows in which to perform measurements associated with the measurement report [Col. 13, lines 45-52, measurement gap configuration message identifies measurement gaps which are measurement time windows], the set of measurement time windows being associated with the type of the measurement report [Col. 29, line 49 – Col. 30, line 15, measurement time period is associated with the type of measurement to be done]; and receiving the measurement report comprising the measurements performed within the set of measurement time windows from the target user equipment [Col. 20, lines 27-43, measurement report is transmitted once measurement is completed]. Regarding claim 28, Zhang teaches each measurement time window of the set of measurement time windows comprises a slot-offset-start and either a slot-offset-end or a duration [Fig. 4]; and the slot-offset-start is specified relative to a slot carrying the control message or relative to a fixed frame boundary or a subframe boundary [Col. 15, lines 18-51]. Regarding claim 29, Zhang teaches a target user equipment, comprising: a memory [Fig. 16, 820]; at least one transceiver [Fig. 16, 830]; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: receive, via the at least one transceiver, a control message from a network entity, the control message identifying a type of a measurement report and a set of measurement time windows in which to perform measurements of one or more signals [Col. 13, lines 45-52, measurement gap configuration message identifies measurement gaps which are measurement time windows], the set of measurement time windows being associated with the type of the measurement report [Col. 29, line 49 – Col. 30, line 15, measurement time period is associated with the type of measurement to be done]; perform the measurements of the one or more signals within the set of measurement time windows [Col. 13, lines 53-67, performs measurement in the measurement time gap/window]; and transmit, via the at least one transceiver, the measurement report to the network entity, the measurement report comprising the measurements of the one or more signals performed within the set of measurement time windows [Col. 20, lines 27-43, measurement report is transmitted once measurement is completed]. Regarding claim 37, Zhang teaches a network entity, comprising: a memory [Fig. 18, 920]; at least one transceiver [Fig. 18, 930]; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: send, via the at least one transceiver, a control message to a target user equipment, the control message identifying a type of a measurement report and a set of measurement time windows in which to perform measurements associated with the measurement report [Col. 13, lines 45-52, measurement gap configuration message identifies measurement gaps which are measurement time windows], the set of measurement time windows being associated with the type of the measurement report [Col. 29, line 49 – Col. 30, line 15, measurement time period is associated with the type of measurement to be done]; and receive, via the at least one transceiver, the measurement report comprising the measurements performed within the set of measurement time windows from the target user equipment [Col. 20, lines 27-43, measurement report is transmitted once measurement is completed]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 7 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over anticipated by Zhang et al. (USPN 12,256,246) in view of Miao et al. (US-PGPUB 2022/0264478). Regarding claims 7 and 23, Zhang teaches a requesting user equipment [Fig. 2, Terminal Device]. However, Zhang does not teach a Sidelink Control Information (SCI) message. Miao teaches a Sidelink Control Information (SCI) message [Para 101]. It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention use SCI message so that indication for measurement reports can be transmitted using SCI messages. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANDRAHAS PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1211. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30 - 17:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Chandrahas B Patel/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707294
BASE STATION NODE MONITORING AND REBOOTING
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695529
METHOD FOR ASCERTAINING THE CONTROL UNIT TEMPERATURE BY MEANS OF A TIME SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOL
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689540
VEHICLE BUS TOPOLOGICAL GRAPH DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684557
COLLISION REDUCTION IN WIRELESS MEDIUM ACCESS
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683885
TEST SYSTEM AND TEST METHOD FOR TIME-SENSITIVE NETWORKING DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 909 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month