Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/569,556

DRILL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Priority
Mar 15, 2022 — JP 2022-040439 +1 more
Examiner
COZART, JERMIE E
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BIC TOOL CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
766 granted / 915 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
933
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1, 3, and 6 in the reply filed on 3/30/26 is acknowledged. Drawings Figure 14 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Krenzer et al. (US 2020/0030893 A1). Regarding claim 1, Krenzer discloses a drill (1; Fig. 1) comprising a first and a second cutting edge (3/1, 3/2) formed symmetrically with respect to a rotation axis; a first and a second relief surface (5/1, 5/2) formed symmetrically with respect to the rotation axis on back surfaces of the first and the second cutting edge (3/1, 3/2), respectively; one chip-discharging groove (23/1) formed from one of the first and the second cutting edge (3/1, 3/2) toward an outer peripheral side; and one or more arc-shaped grooves (29) formed from another of the first and the second cutting edge (3/1, 3/2) toward the outer peripheral side. Claim(s) 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vamamoto et al. (US 20200282472 A1). Regarding claim 1, Vamamoto discloses a drill comprising a first and a second cutting edge (5; Fig. 1) formed symmetrically with respect to a rotation axis; a first and a second relief surface (6) formed symmetrically with respect to the rotation axis on back surfaces of the first and the second cutting edge (5), respectively; one chip-discharging groove (4) formed from one of the first and the second cutting edge (5) toward an outer peripheral side; and one or more arc-shaped grooves (8) formed from another of the first and the second cutting edge (5) toward the outer peripheral side. Regarding claim 3, Vamamoto discloses wherein two or more of the arc-shaped grooves (8) are formed to be adjacent to each other, one of the two or more arc-shaped grooves (8) and the first relief surface (6) are partially adjacent to each other, and another one of the two or more arc-shaped grooves (8) and the second relief surface (6) are adjacent to each other. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The references listed on the attached PTO-892 are cited to show drills some of the features related to the elected claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JERMIE E COZART whose telephone number is (571)272-4528. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30am - 7:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JERMIE E COZART/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799 May 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661249
SYSTEMS FOR DRY TISSUE VALVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654334
Fastener Installation Assembly, an End-Effector Tool, and a Method
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649180
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING IRON GOLF CLUB HEAD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12636172
SCAFFOLDS HAVING A RADIOPAQUE MARKER AND METHODS FOR ATTACHING A MARKER TO A SCAFFOLD
1y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629912
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR BURNISHING A REPLICA TAPE
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month