Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/569,617

BASE STATION-SIDE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND TERMINAL-SIDE ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 13, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHAI MINH
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1107 granted / 1271 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1301
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1271 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-6, and 8-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hou et al. (US 20190335348 A1) in view of Harris et al. (US 9031151 B1). Considering claim 1, Hou teaches a base station-side electronic device for a wireless communication system, comprising a processing circuitry configured to: determine a distance between the base station-side electronic device (eNB) and a terminal-side electronic device (T-VUE, Fig.3-5, [0074] A distance from the T-VUE to eNB1 is d1, a distance from the T-VUE to eNB2 is d2, [0079]); and determine, based on the distance (T-VUE, Fig.3-5, [0074] A distance from the T-VUE to eNB1 is d1, a distance from the T-VUE to eNB2 is d2, [0079]), a distance between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device (Fig.3-4, [0074], [0079]), such that waves (signals) can be used for transmission between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device (Fig.7, 18, [0122], [0212]). Hou do not clearly teach a Rayleigh distance for Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) wave-based communication; and at least two modes of OAM waves can be used for transmission. Harris teaches a Rayleigh distance (Rayleigh range R, pg.6, lines 31-50) for Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) wave-based communication (Fig.3, pg.6, lines 31-50); and at least two modes of OAM waves can be used for transmission (orbital angular momentum (OAM) beam comprising multiple OAM signals each having a different one of a plurality of unique OAM modes, pg.2, lines 2-26). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine or modify of Harris to Hou to provide improvements in receiving and separating the OAM signals of a composite OAM beam. Considering claims 3, 8, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: determine, based on the Rayleigh distance (Hou: [0074], [0079]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.6, lines 31-50), a transmission frequency for OAM wave communication between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 4, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: determine, based on the Rayleigh distance and an antenna aperture of an OAM wave antenna (Harris: Fig.7A) of the base station-side electronic device, a transmission frequency of an OAM wave-based downlink for the terminal-side electronic device; and notify the terminal-side electronic device of information indicating the transmission frequency of the downlink (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 5, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: receive, from the terminal-side electronic device, information indicating an antenna aperture of an OAM wave antenna of the terminal-side electronic device; determine, based on the Rayleigh distance and the antenna aperture of the OAM wave antenna of the terminal-side electronic device, a transmission frequency of an OAM wave-based uplink for the terminal-side electronic device; and notify the terminal-side electronic device of information indicating the transmission frequency of the uplink (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 6, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: notify, through plane wave communication, the terminal-side electronic device of the determined transmission frequency for OAM wave communication between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 9, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: receive, from the terminal-side electronic device, information indicating a status (conditions) of a communication channel between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: [0095]); and determine, according to the status of the communication channel, to use an OAM wave transmission device and/or a plane wave transmission device of the base station-side electronic device to communicate with the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 10, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the status of the communication channel is a multipath status of the communication channel (Hou: [0095]), and the processing circuitry is further configured to: determine, in response to the multipath status of the communication channel indicating that there is a line-of-sight (LOS) path (Hou: [0095] downlink channel quality measurement results reflect information such as a relative position between a user equipment and a base station), to use the OAM wave transmission device to communicate with the terminal-side electronic device; and determine, in response to the multipath status of the communication channel indicating that there is no LOS path while energy of a non-line-of-sight (NLOS) path is greater than a threshold, to use a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) plane wave transmission device of the base station-side electronic device to communicate with the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0095], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 11, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is configured to: send, to the terminal-side electronic device, information instructing the terminal-side electronic device to measure a communication channel between the terminal-side electronic device and one or more other base stations (Hou: [0074], [0095], [0122], [0212]); determine one or more cooperative base stations from the one or more other base stations according to the measurement result from the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: [0074], [0095], [0122], [0212]); and notify the terminal-side electronic device of information indicating the one or more cooperative base stations (Hou: [0074], [0064], [0095]). Considering claims 12, 20, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is configured to: send, to the terminal-side electronic device, information instructing the terminal-side electronic device to measure a communication channel between the terminal-side electronic device and one or more other base stations (Hou: [0074], [0064], [0095]); determine a target base station as a handover target from the one or more other base stations according to the measurement result from the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: [0069]-[0074]); and notify the terminal-side electronic device of information instructing the terminal-side electronic device to be handed over to the target base station (Hou: [0074], [0064], [0095]). Considering claim 13, Hou teaches a method for a base station-side electronic device for a wireless communication system, comprising: determining a distance between the base station-side electronic device and a terminal-side electronic device (T-VUE, Fig.3-5, [0074] A distance from the T-VUE to eNB1 is d1, a distance from the T-VUE to eNB2 is d2, [0079]); determining, based on the distance (Fig.3-5, [0074], [0079]) and an antenna aperture of an wave antenna of the base station-side electronic device, a transmission frequency of an wave-based downlink for the terminal-side electronic device (Fig.7, 18, [0122], [0212]); and notifying the terminal-side electronic device of information indicating the transmission frequency of the downlink ([0064] measurement configuration information may be notified by the serving base station to the user equipment via for example a measConfig cell carried by a Radio Resource Control Connection Reconfiguration (RRCConnectionReconfiguration) message). Hou do not clearly teach antenna aperture of an OAM wave antenna of the base station-side electronic device, a transmission frequency. Harris teaches antenna aperture of an OAM wave antenna of the base station-side electronic device, a transmission frequency (Fig.3, pg.6, lines 31-50, orbital angular momentum (OAM) beam comprising multiple OAM signals each having a different one of a plurality of unique OAM modes, pg.2, lines 2-26). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine or modify of Harris to Hou to provide improvements in receiving and separating the OAM signals of a composite OAM beam. Considering claim 14, Hou and Harris further teach receiving, from the terminal-side electronic device, information indicating an antenna aperture of an OAM wave antenna of the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50); determining, based on the distance and the antenna aperture of the OAM wave antenna of the terminal-side electronic device, a transmission frequency of an OAM wave-based uplink for the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50); and notifying the terminal-side electronic device of information indicating the transmission frequency of the uplink (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 15, Hou teaches a terminal-side electronic device for a wireless communication system, comprising a processing circuitry configured to: receive, from a base station-side electronic device (Fig.3, [0074] data information (which is for example a VX message) is dm, power of eNB1 which is received at the T-VUE), information indicating a transmission frequency downlink (downlink multicast/broadcast Fig.7, [0065], [0170]); and receive a signal on the downlink based on an antenna of the terminal-side electronic device and the transmission frequency of the downlink (downlink multicast/broadcast Fig.7, 20, [0226] transmit and receive a wireless signal via the antenna 2016). Hou do not clearly teach an Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) wave; and an OAM antenna. Harris teaches an Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) wave (Fig.3, pg.6, lines 31-50, orbital angular momentum (OAM) beam comprising multiple OAM signals each having a different one of a plurality of unique OAM modes, pg.2, lines 2-26); and an OAM antenna (Fig.7A). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine or modify of Harris to Hou to provide improvements in receiving and separating the OAM signals of a composite OAM beam. Considering claim 16, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: send, to the base station-side electronic device, information for determining a distance between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device, before receiving the information indicating the transmission frequency of the downlink from the base station-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 17, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: send, to the base station-side electronic device, information indicating an antenna aperture of an OAM antenna of the terminal-side electronic device; receive, from the base station-side electronic device, information indicating a transmission frequency of an OAM wave-based uplink; and transmit a signal on the uplink based on an OAM antenna of the terminal-side electronic device and the transmission frequency of the uplink (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 18, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: send, to the base station-side electronic device, information indicating a status of a communication channel between the base station-side electronic device and the terminal-side electronic device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50); and receive, from the base station-side electronic device, information indicating the use of an OAM wave transmission device and/or a plane wave transmission device, and communicate with the base station-side electronic device using the indicated OAM wave transmission device and/or plane wave transmission device (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Considering claim 19, Hou and Harris further teach wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to: receive, from the base station-side electronic device, information instructing to measure a communication channel between the terminal-side electronic device and one or more other base stations (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50); send the measurement result to the base station-side electronic device; and receive, from the base station-side electronic device, information indicating one or more cooperative base stations, and communicate with the base station-side electronic device and the one or more cooperative base stations according to indicated content (Hou: Fig.7, 18, 20, [0064], [0095], [0122], [0212]; Harris: Rayleigh range R, pg.2, lines 2-26, pg.6, lines 31-50). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAI MINH NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-7923. The examiner can normally be reached 6-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Appiah can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAI M NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604176
EMBEDDED SUBSCRIBER IDENTIFICATION MODULE WITH SECURE PROFILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598503
RADIO INTERFACE MEASUREMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588863
Systems and methods for preventing and treating wrinkles
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587850
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ENFORCING POLICY COMPLIANCE OF VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581402
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CELL SELECTION, TERMINAL, NETWORK DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1271 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month