Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/569,693

Method, Devices, Computer Program and Computer-Readable Medium for Using Configurable Logic for Modular Setup of a Technical Installation

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 13, 2023
Examiner
BROWN, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2115
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
905 granted / 1029 resolved
+32.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1053
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1029 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/13/2023 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 29, 32, 33, 36, and 37 are objected to because of the following informalities: Each of the listed claims depend from claim 26, however, it seems they should depend from claim 27. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 27 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 14 of claim 27 currently reads “at least one further functional module via f the logic unit”. Examiner assumes this should read “at least one further functional module via the configurable logic unit”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 16-37 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Johansson (US PGPub 2015/0301547) in view of Jandhyala et al. [Jandhyala] (US PGPub 2011/0296430). As to claim 16 Johansson discloses a functional module (cloud server 100, see Figs. 1 and 2), comprising: at least one technical object (electric distribution appliances 130, 134, 138; see Fig. 2) which implements a technical process (distributing power) (see paragraph 0073, lines 13-16); a control unit (processor 104/memory means 107, see Fig. 1) which controls the at least one technical object based on predetermined rules (pre-defined rule; see paragraph 0032, line 12/rules relating to how power should be distributed by individual electric distribution appliances 130, 134, 138; see paragraph 0073, lines 13-14) which are stored in the control unit and cannot be changed (see paragraph 0073, lines 2-15); a communication unit (external network/internet 120, see Fig. 2) which exchanges data with external communication partners (mobile phone or mobile computer; see paragraph 0033, line 11); a configurable logic unit (master communication unit 106, see Figs. 1 and 2) which is configured to receive, via the communication unit additional, variably specifiable rules (information packages relating to updates of said rules; see paragraph 0045, lines 2-3) from an external communication partner and, based on the additional, variably specifiable rules and interconnections, to update the rules predetermined in the control unit with respect to an interaction of the functional module with at least one further functional module (see paragraph 0045, lines 1-8). Though Johansson teaches updating existing rules from an external partner; Johansson fails to specifically disclose supplementing the rules and interconnections predetermined in the control unit with respect to an interaction of the functional module. Jandhyala discloses a functional module (clients 110, 112, 114; see Fig. 1) comprising: a configurable logic unit (policy management 105, see Fig. 1) supplementing rules (embedded rules 310, see Fig. 3) and interconnections (access control rules 314, see Fig. 3) predetermined in a control unit (application 302, see Fig. 3) with respect to an interaction of the functional module (see paragraph 0070, lines 5-7 and paragraph 0071, lines 2-6). Johansson and Jandhyala are analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor, which is manipulation of embedded rules. At the time of the invention it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Johansson’s invention with Jandhyala’s in order to supplement both rules and interconnections related to Johansson’s electric distribution appliances, since doing so would permit adjustments to rules and interconnections dictating distribution of electricity. As to claim 17 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the functional module as claimed in claim 16, wherein the communication unit comprises a server, a client, and a subscriber (see Jandhyala paragraph 0045, lines 4-7). As to claim 18 Johansson discloses the functional module as claimed in claim 16, wherein the communication unit is configured to receive information relating to a communication unit of the at least one further functional module and is configured to store said received information in the functional module (see paragraph 0059, lines 1-5). As to claim 19 Johansson discloses the functional module as claimed in claim 16, wherein the control unit includes computer-implemented function blocks; and wherein the control unit is configured, for controlling the technical objects, to use the computer-implemented functional blocks based on the rules and interconnections permanently stored in the control unit (see paragraph 0073, lines 3-15). As to claim 20 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the functional module as claimed in claim 16, wherein the configurable logic unit includes computer-implemented functional blocks and is configured to undertake, based on the received additional, variably specifiable rules and interconnections, a supplementation of the rules and interconnections predetermined in the control unit with respect to an interaction of the functional module with at least one further functional module based on the computer- implemented functional blocks of the configurable logic unit (see Johansson paragraph 0045, lines 1-8; also see Jandhyala paragraph 0070, lines 5-7 and paragraph 0071, lines 2-6). As to claim 21 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the functional module as claimed in claim 17, wherein the server comprises an Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture server, the client comprises an OPC UA client or an OPC UA publisher, and an OPC UA subscriber (see Jandhyala paragraph 0045, lines 4-7). As to claim 22 Johansson discloses the functional module as claimed in claim 18, wherein the received information relates to a network address of the communication units of the at least one further functional module (see paragraph 0059, lines 1-5). As to claim 23 Jandhyala discloses a technical installation, comprising a plurality of functional modules as claimed in claim 17 which are connected to one another for an interaction (see paragraph 0054, lines 1-5; also see Fig. 1). As to claim 24 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the technical installation as claimed in claim 23, further comprising: a configuration system which is configured to communicate the additional, variably specifiable rules and interconnections to the communication unit of one functional module of the plurality of functional modules or to a plurality of communication units of the plurality of functional modules (see Johansson paragraph 0045, lines 1-8). As to claim 25 Johansson discloses the technical installation as claimed in claim 23, further comprising: a visualization system which is configured to visualize the rules and interconnections used to control the at least one technical object of the functional module (see paragraph 0032, lines 12-16). As to claim 26 Johansson discloses the technical installation as claimed in claim 24, further comprising: a visualization system which is configured to visualize the rules and interconnections used to control the at least one technical object of the functional module (see paragraph 0032, lines 12-16). As to claim 27 Johansson discloses a method for operating a functional module (cloud server 100, see Figs. 1 and 2) in a technical installation, the functional module comprising at least one technical object (electric distribution appliances 130, 134, 138; see Fig. 2) which implements a technical process (distributing power) (see paragraph 0073, lines 13-16), a control unit (processor 104/memory means 107, see Fig. 1) which controls the at least one technical object based on predetermined rules (pre-defined rule; see paragraph 0032, line 12/rules relating to how power should be distributed by individual electric distribution appliances 130, 134, 138; see paragraph 0073, lines 13-14), a communication unit (external network/internet 120, see Fig. 2) which is configured to exchange data with external communication partners (mobile phone or mobile computer; see paragraph 0033, line 11), and a configurable logic unit (master communication unit 106, see Figs. 1 and 2), the method comprising: a) permanently storing the predetermined rules in the control unit in an unchangeable manner (see paragraph 0073, lines 2-15); b) transferring additional, variably specifiable rules to the configurable logic unit of the functional module via an external communication partner (mobile phone or mobile computer; see paragraph 0033, line 11) of the functional module (see paragraph 0045, lines 1-8); c) updating the predetermined rules stored in the control unit based on previously received additional, variably specifiable rules with respect to an interaction of the functional module with at least one further functional module via the configurable logic unit (see paragraph 0045, lines 1-8); and d) operating the functional module based on adapted rules in the technical installation (see paragraph 0036, lines 4-6 and paragraph 0045, lines 1-8). Though Johansson teaches updating existing rules from an external partner; Johansson fails to specifically disclose supplementing the rules and interconnections predetermined in the control unit with respect to an interaction of the functional module. Jandhyala discloses a method for operating a functional module (clients 11, 112, 114; see Fig. 1) in a technical installation comprising: a configurable logic unit (policy management 105, see Fig. 1) supplementing rules (embedded rules 310, see Fig. 3) and interconnections (access control rules 314, see Fig. 3) predetermined in a control unit (application 302, see Fig. 3) with respect to an interaction of the functional module (see paragraph 0070, lines 5-7 and paragraph 0071, lines 2-6). Johansson and Jandhyala are analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor, which is manipulation of embedded rules. At the time of the invention it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Johansson’s invention with Jandhyala’s in order to supplement both rules and interconnections related to Johansson’s electric distribution appliances, since doing so would permit adjustments to rules and interconnections dictating distribution of electricity. As to claim 28 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the method as claimed in claim 27, wherein said transferring occurs based on a server-client architecture (see Jandhyala paragraph 0045, lines 4-7). As to claim 29 Johansson discloses the method as claimed in claim 26, wherein the communication unit receives information relating to communication units of the at least one further functional module and stores said received information in the functional module (see paragraph 0059, lines 1-5). As to claim 30 Johansson discloses the method as claimed in claim 27, wherein the communication unit receives information relating to communication units of the at least one further functional module and stores said received information in the functional module (see paragraph 0059, lines 1-5). As to claim 31 Johansson discloses the method as claimed in one of claim 28, wherein the communication unit receives information relating to communication units of the at least one further functional module and stores said received information in the functional module (see paragraph 0059, lines 1-5). As to claim 32 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the method as claimed in claim 26, wherein a communication partner from which the communication unit of the functional module receives the additional, variably specifiable rules and interconnections is a configuration system which is configured to communicate to the communication unit, of the functional module and to a communication unit of at least one further functional module at a runtime of the technical installation additional, variably specifiable rules and interconnections; and wherein, based on previously permanently stored rules and interconnections and based on the additional, variably specifiable rules and interconnections, the functional module and the at least one further functional module interact with one another and possibly with further functional modules at a runtime of the technical installation (see Johansson paragraph 0045, lines 1-8 and paragraph 0073, lines 3-15). As to claim 33 Johansson discloses the method as claimed in claim 26, wherein the rules and interconnections used to control the at least one technical object the functional module are visualized via a visualization system (see paragraph 0032, lines 12-16). As to claim 34 Johansson and Jandhyala disclose the method as claimed in claim 28, wherein the server-client architecture comprises an Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture server-client architecture or an OPC UA publisher-subscriber architecture (see Jandhyala paragraph 0045, lines 4-7). As to claim 35 Johansson discloses the method as claimed in claim 29, wherein the received information relates to a network address of the communication units of the at least one further functional module (see paragraph 0059, lines 1-5). As to claim 36 Johansson discloses a computer program with program code instructions which are executable by a computer for implementing the method as claimed in claim 26 (see paragraph 0073, lines 1-15). As to claim 37 Johansson discloses a non- transitory computer-readable medium comprising commands which, when executed by a processor of a computer, cause the computer to perform the method as claimed in claim 26 (see paragraph 0073, lines 1-15). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael J. Brown whose telephone number is (571)272-5932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 5:30am-4:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kamini Shah can be reached at (571)272-2279. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michael J Brown/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2115
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600093
Information Processing Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594602
Systems and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594727
EXTRUSION-BASED ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING: METHOD AND 3D PRINTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570051
CONVOLUTION MODELING AND LEARNING SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING GEOMETRIC SHAPE ACCURACY OF 3D PRINTED PRODUCTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574794
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AND/OR OPERATING AN AUTOMATION COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1029 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month