Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/570,837

BASE ASSEMBLY AND CHILD SAFETY SEAT FOR VEHICLE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Priority
Jul 26, 2021 — CN 202110844522.X +2 more
Examiner
NELSON JR, MILTON
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1579 granted / 1866 resolved
+32.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1892
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1866 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Non-elected claims 10-21 remain withdrawn from further consideration. Information Disclosure Statement The information referred to in the IDS filed April 16, 2026 has been considered. The information referred to in the IDS filed April 14, 2026 has been considered with the exception of Foreign Patent Documents Cite Nos. 2, 3 and 4, which include publication date errors, and are corrected on the April 14, 2026 IDS. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 3, and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DaSilva (US6199949). Note a base assembly comprising: a base (14); a supporting leg (21); a sliding element (30) telescopically disposed on the base, wherein the supporting leg is pivotally connected to the sliding element and extends (pulled outward away from the Figure 4 position) and retracts (to the Figure 4 position) together with the sliding element; and a traction element (27) capable of being driven by rotation of the supporting leg from an unfolded position (Figure 4) to a folded position (released from 26) to pull the supporting leg to move towards the base. Note that pushing 30 inward from its extended position drives supporting leg (21) to rotate to the Figure 4 position, while also pushing traction element 27 (concurrently with the bias of the traction element pulling the supporting leg) to rotate to the Figure 4 position. Regarding claim 2, note the traction element is a flexible element (spring). Regarding claim 3, note the flexible element is a steel wire, a cord (coiled cord), or a webbing. See Figure 4. Regarding claim 9, note an inner top wall of the base is provided with a fixing column (28), and the first end of the traction element is fixed on the fixing column by a first fastener (hole through 28 which engages 27). Claim(s) 23 and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DaSilva (US6199949). Note a child safety seat (10) for a vehicle comprising: a seat (12) disposed on a base assembly, the base assembly comprising: a base (14); a supporting leg (21); a sliding element (30) telescopically disposed on the base, wherein the supporting leg is pivotally connected to the sliding element and extends (pulled outward away from the Figure 4 position) and retracts (to the Figure 4 position) together with the sliding element; and a traction element (27) capable of being driven by rotation of the supporting leg from an unfolded position (Figure 4) to a folded position (released from 26) to pull the supporting leg to move towards the base. Note that pushing 30 inward from its extended position drives supporting leg (21) to rotate to the Figure 4 position, while also pushing traction element 27 (concurrently with the bias of the traction element pulling the supporting leg) to rotate to the Figure 4 position. Regarding claim 25, note an accommodating groove (inner cavity of the base) for accommodating the supporting leg is provided on the bottom of the base, and after the supporting leg is folded at the bottom of the base, a lower surface of the supporting leg does not protrude from a bottom surface of the base. See Figure 4. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by GB2106777A. Note a base assembly comprising: a base (20); a supporting leg (34); a sliding element (30) telescopically disposed on the base, wherein the supporting leg is pivotally connected (at 34a) to the sliding element and extends and retracts (Figures 3-6) together with the sliding element; and a traction element (33) capable of being driven by rotation of the supporting leg from an unfolded position (Figure 2) to a folded position (Figure 1) to pull (by way of element 25) the supporting leg to move towards the base. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DE3409787A1. Note a base assembly comprising: a base (1); a supporting leg (7); a sliding element (3) telescopically disposed on the base, wherein the supporting leg is pivotally connected (at 9) to the sliding element and extends (Figure 1c) and retracts (Figure 1a) together with the sliding element; and a traction element (6) capable of being driven by rotation of the supporting leg from an unfolded position (Figures 1b-1c) to a folded position (Figure 1a) to pull (by way of spring bias) the supporting leg to move towards the base. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8, 22 and 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Amendment/Arguments Applicant’s response filed April 22, 2026 has been fully considered. Remaining issues are described above. DaSilva (US6199949) remains applied to certain of the claims, as amended. Note as detailed above. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) details the Examiner’s interpretation of this prior art reference as it corresponds to the claim limitations. Note in particular how the traction element is physically capable of being driven (concurrently with its own spring bias) by rotation of the supporting leg from an unfolded position to a folded position to pull the supporting leg (as the supporting leg pushes) to move towards the base. Additional prior art has been applied to certain of the claims, as necessitated by amendment. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MILTON NELSON JR whose telephone number is (571)272-6861. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30am-1:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. mn /MILTON NELSON JR/July 2, 2026 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703279
CUSHION ASSEMBLY
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696986
CHILD CARRIER
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691799
CHILD RESTRAINT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691800
CHILD RESTRAINT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691797
RECLINING DEVICE FOR VEHICLE SEAT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.6%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1866 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month