Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/570,901

DESIGN MAINTENANCE SYSTEM, DESIGN MAINTENANCE METHOD, DESIGN MAINTENANCE SERVE EQUIPMENT, AND DESIGN MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR WIRELESS FACILITY

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
PIERCE, DAMON JOSEPH
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
NTT, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
646 granted / 860 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
895
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 860 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception (i.e., a law of nature, a natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea) without significantly more. The claim 1 recites “[A] design maintenance system…” which falls within the statutory category of a machine. Claim 6 recites “[A] design maintenance method…” which falls within the statutory category of a process. Claim 7 recites “[A] design maintenance server…” which fails within the statutory category of a machine. The claims are directed to game processing involving: Communicating information, Notifying a person of game progression, These steps, when viewed in their entirety, describe organizing and managing a set of rules for indicating status of a game, which is a form of managing human activity and following rules for playing a game. The USPTO recognizes “rules for playing a game” as an abstract idea (see MPEP § 2106.04(a)(2), Example 37; and In re Smith, 815 F.3d 816 (Fed. Cir. 2016)). The recited “calculate a progress value” based on other information is a mathematical concept (measurement based on numerical parameters) and mental processes that could be performed in the human mind or with pen and paper. Thus, the claims recite an abstract idea: rules and mathematical concepts for how a game progresses. The claim does not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. The recited “wireless equipment” and “design maintenance server” are generic computer components performing generic functions (storing information, communicating information). The claim does not improve the functioning of the computer itself or another technology; rather, it uses the computer components as tools to implement the abstract idea of notifying a person of the progression of a game according to rules. The additional elements (wireless equipment, design maintenance server, design maintenance tool, wireless information) do not impose a meaningful limit on the abstract idea. Accordingly, the claim does not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application under MPEP § 2106.04(d). The claim does not recite additional elements that amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. The use of generic tool, generic server, and generic information to implement game status rules is well-understood, routine, and conventional in the field of computer gaming. The “progress value” parameter is merely data used in the abstract notification process; it do not constitute an unconventional technical solution or improvement in computer functionality. No specific algorithm, data structure, or hardware improvement is claimed that would transform the abstract idea into patent-eligible subject matter. Therefore, the claim as a whole amounts to no more than the abstract idea of indicating status of a game according to rules, implemented on a generic computer. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Pub. 20150190709; US Pub. 20150181372; JP Pub. 2020141395; and JP Pub. 2021022145. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAMON J PIERCE whose telephone number is (571)270-1997. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at 571-270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAMON J PIERCE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594490
CONTROL DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582916
PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582912
STORAGE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND GAME PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569753
SERVER APPARATUS, EVENT DATA PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569765
INTERACTION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 860 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month