Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/571,020

STOCK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD IN A FILLING PLANT FOR PACKAGING POURABLE FOOD PRODUCTS INTO COMPOSITE PACKAGES

Non-Final OA §101§102§103
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
OBAID, FATEH M
Art Unit
3627
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
523 granted / 769 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
798
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 769 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This communication is in response to the application filed on 12/15/2023. Claims 1-16 have been amended. Claims 17-20 have been newly added. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. The IDS received on 12/15/2023 has been considered by the examiner. Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Specifically, claims 1-20 are directed to an abstract idea without additional elements amounting to significantly more than the abstract idea. With respect to Step 2A Prong One of the framework, claim 1 recites an abstract idea. Claim 1 includes elements for “provided on respective storing units designed for storage of a respective plurality of packaging material elements, including first stock information about the packaging material elements stored in the respective storing unit the warehouse containing a stock of the packaging material elements for forming composite packages; provided on each of the packaging material element, including second stock information about related packaging material element; and control system configured to: receive operating data from the at least one filling machine relating to the-filling operations, the at least one filling machine configured to form the composite packages from a multilayer composite packaging material and to implement filling operations to fill the composite packages with a pourable food product; and merge the first and second stock information with the operating data, to implement management of the stock of the packaging material elements.” The limitations above recite an abstract idea. More particularly, the elements above recite certain methods of organizing human activity related to managing personal behavior or relationships or interactions between people because the elements describe stock management system and method. Further, the elements above recite mental processes because the elements describe observations or evaluations that could be practically performed in the mind or by using pen and paper. As a result, claim 1 recites an abstract idea under Step 2A Prong One. Claim 16 include substantially similar limitations to those included with respect to claim 1. As a result, claim 16 recite an abstract idea under Step 2A Prong One for the same reasons as stated above with respect to claim 1. Claims 2-15 and 17-20 further describe the process for selecting and viewing organizational information and further recite certain methods of organizing human activity and/ mental processes for the same reasons as stated above. As a result, claims 2-15 and 17-20 recite an abstract idea under Step 2A Prong One. With respect to Step 2A Prong Two of the framework, claim 1 does not include additional elements that integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. Claim 1 includes additional elements that do not recite an abstract idea under Step 2A Prong One. The additional elements include tags, servers, readers and machines. When considered in view of the claim as a whole, the additional elements do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application because the tags, servers, readers and machines amounts to no more than a general computing component that is used as a tool to perform the recited abstract idea, and the step for gathering information is an insignificant extra solution activity to the recited abstract idea. As a result, claim 1 does not include any additional elements that integrate the abstract idea into a practical application under Step 2A Prong Two. As noted above, claim 16 include substantially similar limitations to those included with respect to claim 1. As a result, claim 16 do not include any additional elements that integrate the abstract idea into a practical application under Step 2A Prong Two. Claims 2-15 and 17-20 do not include any additional elements beyond those included with respect to the claims from which claims 2-15 and 17-20 depend. As a result, claims 2-15 and 17-20 do not include any additional elements that integrate the abstract idea into a practical application under Step 2A Prong Two for the same reasons as stated above. With respect to Step 2B of the framework, claim 1 does not include additional elements amounting to significantly more than the abstract idea. As noted above, claim Includes additional elements that do not recite an abstract idea under Step 2A Prong One. The additional elements include tags, servers, readers and machines and a step for stock management. The additional elements do not amount to significantly more than the recited abstract idea because the additional elements the computing device amounts to no more than a general computing component that is used as a tool to perform the recited abstract idea, and the step for stock management is a well-understood, routine, and conventional data processing in view of MPEP 2105.06(d)(II). Further, looking at the additional elements as an ordered combination adds nothing that is not already present when considering the additional elements individually. As a result, claim 1 does not include any additional elements that amount to significantly more than the recited abstract idea under Step 2B. As noted above, claims 16 include substantially similar limitations to those included with respect to claim 1. Further, looking at the additional elements as an ordered combination adds nothing that is not already present when considering the additional elements individually. As a result, claim 16 do not include any additional elements that amount to significantly more than the recited abstract idea under Step 2B. Claims 2-15 and 17-20 do not include any additional elements beyond those included with respect to the claims from which claims 2-15 and 17-20 depend. As a result, claims 2-15 and 17-20 do not include any additional elements that amount to significantly more than the recited abstract idea under Step 2B for the same reasons as stated above. Therefore, the claims are directed to an abstract idea without additional elements amounting to significantly more than the abstract idea. Nothing is the claims provides a technological improvement beyond implementing abstract ideas on generic machines Accordingly, claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claims 1-5, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schoening “US 2019/0303848 A1” (Schoening). Regarding Claims 1 and 16: A stock management system in a filling plant with at least one filling machine product, and a warehouse the system comprising: first tag elements provided on respective storing units designed for storage of a respective plurality of packaging material elements (at least See Schoening Abstract; Fig.1; [0036]-[0046]), each of the first tag elements including first stock information about the packaging material elements stored in the respective storing unit (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0045]-[0055]) the warehouse containing a stock of the packaging material elements for forming composite packages (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0022]-[0025]); a second tag element provided on each of the packaging material element (at least See Schoening [0036]-[0041]), the second tag clement including second stock information about related packaging material element (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0040]-[0044]); and control system configured to: receive operating data from the at least one filling machine relating to the-filling operations, the at least one filling machine configured to form the composite packages from a multilayer composite packaging material and to implement filling operations to fill the composite packages with a pourable food product (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0050]-[0060]; Note: “[0059] FIGS. 5-18 illustrate examples of information that may be shown on a display screen 50 of the user interface device 23 during this activity. Common elements between FIGS. 5-18 are shown using common reference numerals. In particular, FIGS. 5-10 illustrate examples of the information displayed to the forklift operator on a display screen 50 of the user interface device 23 when a product 13 in the storage and shipping environment 10 needs to be relocated to a particular bin 14 or delivered to a particular loading bay 16 and placed on a truck. FIGS. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 illustrate a display screen 50C, 50D, 50E, 50F, 50G, and 50H, respectively, of the user interface device 23 displaying a product code 60, a roll number 62 (as in this case the product 13 is a roll of material), a current location 64 of a product 13, a destination 66 of the product 13, an RFID tag counter 68, a next roll input 70, a product information menu 72, and a relock-roll input 75. The product code 60 and the roll number 62 are displayed on the display screen 50D and correlate to the product information stored in the product and order database 27. Such information may be used by the forklift operator, for example, to confirm product delivery information (e.g., the product code 60 or the roll number 62) with a truck driver or other storage facility worker. Additionally, the product delivery information is shown in multiple locations 60, 64, and 66 on the display screens 50C, 50D, 50E, 50F, 50G, and 50H. In particular, when the RFID reader 20 queries the tracking application 36, for example, the tracking application 36 sends product information from the product and order database 27 to the user interface device 23, after the RFID reader 20 has locked on to one product 13, as illustrated in FIG. 6. The product information sent by the tracking application 36 to the user interface device 23 shown on the display screen 50B includes, for example, the current location 64 of the product 13, the destination 66 of the product 13, and the trailer truck, if the destination 66 of the product is a bay 16 with a truck waiting to be loaded.”); and merge the first and second stock information with the operating data, to implement management of the stock of the packaging material elements (at least See Schoening Abstract; Figs. 1-2; [0050]-[0060]). Regarding Claim 2: The system according to claim 1, wherein the packaging material elements comprise reels of packaging material and the storing units comprises pallets housing a respective plurality of the reels of packaging material (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0042]-[0046]). Regarding Claim 3: The system according to claim 1, wherein the first stock information stored in each first tag element includes an identification code of the respective storing unit and information related to each of the packaging material elements stored by the respective storing unit comprising one or more of the following: a production order; a best before date; a total number of packages that can be produced; and wherein the second stock information stored in each second tag element includes an identification code of the respective packaging material element and one or more of the following: the production order; the best before date; a counter indicative of the packages produced, wasted and/or that may still be produced using the respective packaging material element, the counter being variable and updated based on the operating data from the at least one filling machine; or an indication of the at least one filling machine that used the packaging material element (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0047]-[0054]). Regarding Claim 4: The system according to claim 1, wherein the control system comprises: a central server comprising a database configured to store the first stock information, the second stock information, and the operating data; and a mobile device(16) carried by an operator of the filling plant, operatively coupled to the central server and configured to execute a stock management application for the management of the stock of the packaging material elements (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0026]-[0030]). Regarding Claim 5: The system according to claim 4, comprising a gate, arranged at the warehouse where the storing units are placed, provided with comprising a detection unit configured to: read the first stock information stored in the first tag element of the storing units; and transmit the read first stock information to the central server, to be the read first stock information stored in the database (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0055]-[0060]). Regarding Claim 8: The system according to claim, wherein the control system is configured to provide, for each of the packaging material element, at least one of the following: -a number of fully used packaging material elements; -a number of partially used packaging material elements, with a first respective count of the packaging material elements that are remaining; -a number of unused packaging material elements (5) that are still unused, with a second respective count of the packaging material elements that are remaining packages left; and or -a stock time from receiving date to usage date for the packaging material elements ,and -wherein the control is further configured to provide indications on which of the packaging material elements to use for a specific production run, based on available availability of the unused packaging material elements or partially used packaging material elements matching the specific production run (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0056]-[0060]). Regarding Claim 9: The system according to claim 8, wherein the control system is configured to provide notifications to an operator of the filling plant before an expiration date of unused packaging material elements or partially used packaging material elements present in the warehouse (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0049]-[0051]). Regarding Claim 12: The system according to claim 1, wherein the first stock information content in the first tag element is designed to be written or updated automatically, when responsive to the packaging material elements are being placed on the respective storing unit (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0048]-[0051]). Regarding Claim 13: The system according to claim 1,wherein the first and second tag elements are comprising RFID tags (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0036]-[0046]). Regarding Claim 17: The method according to claim 16, further comprising providing package information for each of the packaging material element, the information comprising one or more of the following: a number of fully used packaging material elements; a number of partially used packaging material elements, with a respective count of the packaging material elements that are remaining; a number of unused packaging material elements, with a respective count of the packaging material elements that are remaining; or a stock time from receiving date to usage date for the packaging material elements, wherein the method further comprises providing indications on which of the packaging material elements to use for a specific production run, based on availability of the unused packaging material elements or partially used packaging material elements matching the specific production run (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0056]-[0060]). Regarding Claim 18: The method according to claim 17, further comprising providing notifications to an operator of the filling plant before an expiration date of unused packaging material elements or partially used packaging material elements present in the warehouse (at least See Schoening Abstract; [0049]-[0051]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-7, 10-11, 14-15 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schoening “US 2019/0303848 A1” (Schoening) in view of Schoening et al. “US 9,224,125 B2” (Schoening). Regarding Claim 6: The system according to claim 1, wherein the control is configured to provide information on which of the packaging material elements are in stock and on a respective usage rate (at least see Schoening-125 8:5-25). Regarding Claim 7: The system according to claim 6, wherein the control system is configured to provide, for each of the packaging material element: information on which of the at least one filling machine the respective packaging material element- has been used; a date and time of respective filling operations; and a number of produced packages and wasted packages, based on which the respective usage rate is determined (at least see Schoening-125 9:1-20). Regarding Claim 10: The system according to claim 1, wherein the filling plant comprises a control device configured to control operation thereof and wherein the at least one filling machine is configured to: read the second tag element on the packaging material element(5) to retrieve an identification code indicative of the related multilayer composite packaging material and/or of the related composite packages; and provide the identification code to the control device; wherein the control device is configured to automatically set operational parameters of the filling plant as a function of the identification code (at least see Schoening-125 5:10-30). Regarding Claim 11: The system according to claim 10, wherein the control device is configured to inhibit the filling operations if-responsive to the operational parameters associated with the identification code do-not matching a current production (at least see Schoening-125 6:45-65). Regarding Claim 14: A filling plant, comprising the stock management system according any of the preceding claims claim 1 (at least see Schoening-125 Figs. 1-2). Regarding Claim 15: The filling plant according to claim 14, wherein the at least one filling machine comprises at least one or more of the following: -a conveying device for advancing a web of the multilayer composite packaging material along an advancement path; -a tube forming device for forming a tube from the web-(4) of the multilayer packaging material; -a sealing device for longitudinally sealing the tube; -a filling device for filling the tube with the pourable food product; or -a package forming unit for forming the tube and to transversally seal the tube for at least partially defining the composite packages (at least see Schoening-125 10:20-67). Regarding Claim 19: The method according to claim 16, further comprising: reading the second tag element on the packaging material element with the at least one filling machine to retrieve an identification code indicative of the related multilayer composite packaging material and/or of the related composite packages, the filling plant comprising a control device configured to control operation thereof; and providing the identification code with the at least one filling machine to the control device, wherein the control device is configured to automatically set operational parameters of the filling plant as a function of the identification code (at least see Schoening-125 5:10-30). Regarding Claim 20: The method according to claim 19, further comprising: determining whether the operational parameters associated with the identification code do not match a current production; and inhibiting the filling operations with the control device, responsive to the operational parameters associated with the identification code not matching a current production (at least see Schoening-125 6:45-65). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made (Pre-AIA ) or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA FITF) to use Schoening-125’s teachings in Schoening’s enabled, for the advantage of to achieve automated inventory-aware control of filling operations to coordinate inventory and machine operations for efficient production. Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon, which is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, are cited in the Notice of Reference Cited form (PT0-892). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FATEH M OBAID whose telephone number is (571)270-7121. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 A.M to 4:30 P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ryan Zeender can be reached at (571) 272-6790. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FATEH M OBAID/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586678
INSTRUMENT MANAGEMENT DEVICE FOR MEDICAL INSTRUMENT, INSTRUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND INSTRUMENT MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR MEDICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586136
ACCELERATED INTELLIGENT ENTERPRISE INCLUDING TIMELY VENDOR SPEND ANALYTICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579868
PRINTER DETACHABLE KIOSK APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572970
INTERACTIVE VENDING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12548093
Mobile Food Order in Advance Systems
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.0%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 769 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month