EXAMINER’S COMMENT
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-4, 8, 10, 20-23, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Boyles (US 3,628625).
With respect to claim 1 Boyles discloses a skirt for an underside of a vehicle, the skirt comprising:
a barrier 7 (“ in the form of a plurality of independent pivotal levers spaced along each side of the hull 1, interconnected by flexible fluid impermeable sheets,” Winter, col. 3, lines 5-8) configured to extend downwards from an upper surface of the skirt (as shown in Fig. 3 of Winter);
a rim 4 disposed at a lower end of the barrier 7, wherein the barrier 7 is configured to allow relative movement between the rim 4 and the upper surface (located at or near pivotal mean 8);
With respect to claim 1, Boyles discloses a skirt for an underside of a vehicle, the skirt comprising:
a barrier 20 configured to extend downwards from an upper surface 18 of the skirt (as shown in Fig. 1 of Boyles);
a rim 21 disposed at a lower end of the barrier 20, wherein the barrier 20 is configured to allow relative movement between the rim 21 and the upper surface 18 (Boyles, col. 2, lines 34-37;
an actuation mechanism 29/30 for controlling a height of the rim above a ground surface 17 on which the vehicle is disposed (Boyles, col. 2, lines 48-67), wherein the actuation mechanism 29/30 comprises:
an actuator 29 configured to cause a motion of a movable element along a first axis (the rotary motion of actuator 29 comprises a component of motion that lies along a horizontal axis), the first axis being in a first plane that is substantially parallel to the upper surface 18 of the skirt; and
a converting mechanism (slotted, angled lever at bottom of lever 29 and rod 30) configured to convert the motion along the first axis into a motion (vertical movement of the rim 21 along a second axis (perpendicular axis), the second axis being substantially perpendicular to the first plane such that the second axis extends towards the ground surface (the second axis is a vertical axis that extends towards the ground), wherein a first end of the converting mechanism is connected to the movable element (shaft of actuator 29) and a second end of the converting mechanism 30 is connected to the rim21 (through framework 19).
With respect to claim 2, Boyles discloses that the actuation mechanism 29/30 is further configured to apply a force to the rim 21 to press the rim towards the ground surface 17 (as shown in Fig. 1 of Boyles).
With respect to claim 3, Boyles discloses that the actuator 29 is capable of being operable to vary the force applied to the rim 21 (a user exerting a stronger force on lever 29 will ultimately vary the force applied to the rim).
With respect to claim 4, Boyles disclose that the actuator 29 is capable of being operable to set the force applied to the rim to one of a first force and a second force, wherein the first force has a greater magnitude than the second force (user could move the lever to apply a first force or move the lever further to apply a second force).
With respect to claim 8, barring any disclosure indicating otherwise, the skirt of Boyles is interpreted as being symmetrical in a width direction of the vehicle. Thus, the barrier 20 comprises a first section disposed on a first side of a centreline of the skirt (for example, the portion of the barrier on the driver’s side of the vehicle), and a second section disposed on a second side of the centreline (for example, the portion of the barrier on the passenger’s side of the vehicle) , the centreline being a line that is centred about a width of the upper surface of the skirt (and centered about a width of the overall vehicle); and
a first section of the rim 21 (on the driver’s side) is disposed at a lower end of the first section of the barrier 20, and a second section of the rim 21 (on the passenger’s side) is disposed at a lower end of the second section of the barrier 20.
With respect to claim 10, while not explicitly shown, it is presumed that the rim 21 disclosed by Boyles forms an enclosed space about the entire periphery of the barrier 20 since the apparatus is functional to create subambient pressure beneath the vehicle (Boyles, abstract). Thus, the rim 21 comprises a connection portion that extends between the first section of the rim and the second section of the rim, such that the connection portion crosses the centreline of the skirt (as previously mentioned, it is presumed that the rim 21 forms an unbroken shape around the bottom of barrier 20).
With respect to claim 20, Boyles discloses a base (floor of vehicle) disposed on the upper surface 18 of the skirt, wherein the actuator 29 and the converting mechanism are mounted on the base (as shown in Fig. 1 of Boyles).
With respect to claim 21, while, Boyles only discloses one actuator 29, it has been held that the mere duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced (see MPEP§ 2144.04, part VI, B). In this instance, there has been no unexpected result disclosed in the provision of two actuators mounted in parallel. A second actuator 29 would simply provide and additional for lifting a portion of the weight of the skirt. Note, any two elements can be considered to be parallel.
With respect to claim 22, Boyles discloses that the actuation mechanism 29 is configured to move the rim 21 between a deployed position (as shown in Fig. 1 of Boyles) where the rim 21 is at a first height above the ground surface, and a stowed position (“end position,” Boyles, col. 2, lines 61-62) where the rim is at a second height above the ground surface, the second height being greater than the first height.
With respect to claim 23, Boyles discloses that the actuation mechanism is independent from a suspension system of the vehicle (as shown in Fig. 1 of Boyles).
With respect to claim 25, Boyles discloses that the upper surface 18 of the skirt is located on an underside of the vehicle 10 as shown in Fig. 1 of Boyles.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 5-6 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boyles (US 3,628625), as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Winter (US 3,389,672).
With respect to claim 5, Boyles discloses the claimed skirt except for the actuator comprising a fluid-filled actuator. However, Winter teaches a similar skirt 4/7 including an actuator 11 wherein actuator 11 comprises a fluid-filled actuator (“hydraulic jacks 11. . . or pneumatic systems,” Winter, col. 3, lines 20-22; Fig. 3).
It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains, with a reasonable expectation of success, to combine the teaching of Winter with the skirt disclosed by Boyles for the advantage of automating the manual activity of moving the lever actuator 29.
With respect to claim 6, Winter teaches that the actuator 11 may be a pneumatic actuator (“hydraulic jacks 11. . . or pneumatic systems,” Winter, col. 3, lines 20-22; Fig. 3).
With respect to claim 24, Boyles discloses the claimed skirt except for the controller for controlling the actuation mechanism. However, Winter teaches a similar skirt 4/7 including an a fluid-filled actuator (“hydraulic jacks 11. . . or pneumatic systems,” Winter, col. 3, lines 20-22; Fig. 3) for operating the actuating mechanism. Although, not explicitly discloses, such a controller (i.e., hydraulic jack) would require some type of controller to operate the hydraulic jack).
It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains, with a reasonable expectation of success, to combine the teaching of Winter with the skirt disclosed by Boyles for the advantage of automating the manual activity of moving the lever actuator via hydraulic jacks.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 7, 9, and 11-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter:
Claim 7 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the actuation mechanism being disposed inside the region defined at least in part by the barrier.
Claim 9 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the actuation mechanism being located at the centerline of the skirt.
Claim 11 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the converting mechanism being connect to the connection portion of the rim.
Claim 12 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the two or more actuation mechanism being spaced apparat along the centerline of the skirt.
Claim 13-16 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the rim being connected to the lever such that pivoting of the lever causes motion of the rim along the second axis.
Claims 17-18 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the converting mechanism being connected to the rim via a pivot joint.
Claim 19 has been indicated as containing allowable subject matter primarily for the converting mechanism being connected to the rim via a sliding joint.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL J COLILLA whose telephone number is (571)272-2157. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 - 4:00.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Daniel J Colilla/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612