Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/571,502

AN ELECTRICALLY POWERED SURFBOARD, AND A SURFBOARD BATTERY HOUSING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Priority
Jul 01, 2021 — SE 2150861-9 +2 more
Examiner
AVILA, STEPHEN P
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ride Awake AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1549 granted / 1929 resolved
+28.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1963
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
65.1%
+25.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1929 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 2-8 and 10-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Tianjin (CN 1120716 A; cited by Applicant). With respect to claims 2-5, 10, 16, 21, Tianjin (note in particular paragraphs 0008,0015,0017,0034,0040,0042; All the Figures) discloses the claimed surfboard 20 with a surfboard body 20 extending along a longitudinal direction L and having an upper surface (Figure 3) and an opposite bottom surface, an upwardly open cavity (Figures 2-4) formed in the upper surface, an electric drive (inherently) for propelling the surfboard, a battery housing 110 having an upper face and being connected with the electric drive for supplying electrical energy, the upper face having a recess (note recess for handle 200) extending between opposite side faces of the battery housing being removably received in the cavity, a bracket handle 200 with a central portion and opposite side portions defining arms 210 pivotally mounted 120 to the battery housing to allow turning of the bracket handle between a carrying position (Figure 5) for carrying the battery housing when removed from the cavity and a second position nested in the recess (Figure 3), a latch 211, 40 with latching portion 140, 211 in releasable engagement with the bracket handle when nested in the recess (15, 39, 41 or claim 8). Tianjin further discloses one or both of the arms releasably engaged with the surfboard body in the second position to prevent removal of the battery housing (Figure 2; 600). With respect to claims 6-8, 11-12, note Tianjin, Figures 2-4. With respect to claims 13-14, 20, note Tianjin, Figure 2, 400. With respect to claim 15, note Tianjin, Figure 2, 600. With respect to claims 17-19, note Tianjin, 211, 140. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tianjin (CN 1120716 A; cited by Applicant) in view of Heidenreich et al (US 2003/0022545; cited by Applicant). With respect to claim 9, Tianjin does not disclose the particular claimed latch. Heidenreich et al teach a specific latch assembly (note all the Figures). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to form the device of Tianjin with a latch in the manner claimed as taught by Heidenreich et al with a high likelihood of success for improved ease of use. The combination combines known features to achieve predictable results. Further, it is noted that a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have some years of experience and would be familiar with various latching systems and would have found the combination to have been obvious. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Langelaan (US 9359044) shows a surfboard. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN AVILA whose telephone number is (571)272-6678. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samuel J. Morano can be reached at 571-272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEPHEN AVILA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3617 /STEPHEN P AVILA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640615
OUTBOARD ENGINE
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12623764
OUTBOARD MOTOR AND MARINE VESSEL
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617513
OUTBOARD MARINE ENGINE WITH INTEGRATED PERCEPTION SENSOR
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12606285
UNMANNED UNDERWATER VEHICLE AND SYSTEM FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF UNDERWATER FACILITIES AND METHOD OF MANAGING A TETHER TO SUPPLY POWER AND TO CONTROL SAID UNDERWATER VEHICLE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606287
OUTBOARD MOTOR AND MARINE VESSEL
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.1%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1929 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month