Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/572,138

TRANSFER APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Priority
Dec 07, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022045030
Examiner
MCCLAIN, GERALD
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ebara Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
587 granted / 791 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
824
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 791 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2 June 2026 has been entered. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the item numbers should be in parentheses. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uchida et al. (US 2021/0098270) (“Uchida”) in view of Ide et al. (US 2022/0270912) (“Ide”). Uchida discloses: Claim 1: transferring a substrate (W) in an elevating direction and a traveling direction perpendicular to the elevating direction (Fig. 2-4/12), comprising: an attachment member (rectangles shown between 63 and TW1/TW3/PU/etc. in at least Fig. 2-3); a processing module including a substrate loading/unloading port, the attachment member including a plurality of traveling rails extending in a traveling direction, the plurality of traveling rails being disposed on both sides of the substrate loading/unloading port in the elevating direction (Fig. 2-4/12; para. [0069]-[0072]; rails shown therein); an elevating rail extending in the elevating direction across the plurality of traveling rails and being movable along the plurality of traveling rails (Fig. 2-4/12; para. [0069]-[0072]; rails shown therein); a transfer robot configured to be movable vertically along the elevating rail and including a hand for holding a substrate (CR1; 71a/71b/etc. in Fig. 2-4/12; para. [0069]-[0072]); Claim 2: the plurality of Claim 3: wherein the plurality of Claim 4: a first processing module having a first side surface on which the substrate loading/unloading port is formed; a second processing module having a second side surface on which the substrate loading/unloading port is formed; a first module frame for installing the first processing module; a second module frame for installing the second processing module, the second module being spaced apart from the first module frame such that the first side surface and the second side surface face one another; a substrate transfer space surrounded by the first side surface and the second side surface to be formed; and the transfer apparatus disposed in the substrate transfer space and attached to the side surface of the first module frame or the second module frame (7’s; Fig. 1-4/12; para. [0069]-[0072]). Uchida does not directly show: Claim 1: an attachment member fixed to a side surface of a module frame, the module frame configured to have disposed therein a processing module; Claim 2: wherein the attachment member further includes a plurality of fixed rails fixed to the side surface and extending in the elevating direction, the plurality of traveling rails are fixed to the plurality of fixed rails, Claim 3: plurality of fixed rails. Ide shows a similar device having: Claim 1: an attachment member fixed to a side surface of a module frame (FIG. 3, 46 into 45/20/etc.; para. [0040]), the module frame configured to have disposed therein a processing module (at least processing module 34 within 45/20/etc.); Claim 2: wherein the attachment member further includes a plurality of fixed rails fixed to the side surface and extending in the elevating direction (41/42; para. [0040]), the plurality of traveling rails are fixed to the plurality of fixed rails (FIG. 4), Claim 3: plurality of fixed rails (41/42; para. [0040]); with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of ensuring relatively high rigidity as described in Ide para. [0039] and ensuring that positional accuracy of the transfer robot may be improved (para. [0039]/[0040]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Uchida as taught by Ide and include Ide’s similar device having: Claim 1: an attachment member fixed to a side surface of a module frame, the module frame configured to have disposed therein a processing module; Claim 2: wherein the attachment member further includes a plurality of fixed rails fixed to the side surface and extending in the elevating direction, the plurality of traveling rails are fixed to the plurality of fixed rails, Claim 3: plurality of fixed rails; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of ensuring relatively high rigidity as described in Ide para. [0039] and ensuring that positional accuracy of the transfer robot may be improved. Claim(s) 5-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Uchida in view of Ide and Aoki et al. (US 2020/0219736) (“Aoki”). Uchida discloses all the limitations of the claims as discussed above. Uchida does not directly show: Claim 5: a fan module disposed above the substrate transfer space and configured to provide a gas to the substrate transfer space; Claim 6: wherein the first processing module and the second processing module include a plating module for performing a plating process on the substrate; Claim 7: wherein the first processing module further includes a pre-wet module for performing a pre-wet process on the substrate, and the second processing module further includes a drying module for drying the substrate; Claim 8: wherein in a first area adjacent to the substrate transfer space in the traveling direction of the transfer robot, a dry robot for gripping or releasing of the substrate between a substrate cassette, the pre-wet module, and the drying module is disposed, in a second area adjacent to the substrate transfer space opposite to the first area in the traveling direction of the transfer robot, an access port for accessing the transfer apparatus disposed in the substrate transfer space from outside the substrate processing apparatus. Aoki shows a similar device having: Claim 5: a fan module disposed above the substrate transfer space and configured to provide a gas to the substrate transfer space (75A; para. [0044]/etc.); Claim 6: wherein the first processing module and the second processing module include a plating module for performing a plating process on the substrate (film/etc.; para. [0032]/[0055]/etc.); Claim 7: wherein the first processing module further includes a pre-wet module for performing a pre-wet process on the substrate, and the second processing module further includes a drying module for drying the substrate (51/52; para. [0078]/[0084]/etc.); Claim 8: wherein in a first area adjacent to the substrate transfer space in the traveling direction of the transfer robot, a dry robot for gripping or releasing of the substrate between a substrate cassette, the pre-wet module, and the drying module is disposed, in a second area adjacent to the substrate transfer space opposite to the first area in the traveling direction of the transfer robot, an access port for accessing the transfer apparatus disposed in the substrate transfer space from outside the substrate processing apparatus (51/52; para. [0078]/[0084]/etc.; FIG 1/3); with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of wafer processing and reducing the running cost of the apparatus (para. [0086]/[0088]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Uchida and Ide as taught by Aoki and include Aoki’s similar device having: Claim 5: a fan module disposed above the substrate transfer space and configured to provide a gas to the substrate transfer space; Claim 6: wherein the first processing module and the second processing module include a plating module for performing a plating process on the substrate; Claim 7: wherein the first processing module further includes a pre-wet module for performing a pre-wet process on the substrate, and the second processing module further includes a drying module for drying the substrate; Claim 8: wherein in a first area adjacent to the substrate transfer space in the traveling direction of the transfer robot, a dry robot for gripping or releasing of the substrate between a substrate cassette, the pre-wet module, and the drying module is disposed, in a second area adjacent to the substrate transfer space opposite to the first area in the traveling direction of the transfer robot, an access port for accessing the transfer apparatus disposed in the substrate transfer space from outside the substrate processing apparatus; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of increasing the efficiency of wafer processing and reducing the running cost of the apparatus. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pp. 6-10, filed 2 June 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-4 under Aoki have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Aoki, Ide, et al. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gerald McClain whose telephone number is (571)272-7803. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and at gerald.mcclain@uspto.gov (see MPEP 502.03 (II)). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Gerald McClain/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Nov 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703584
HAND, HOLDING DEVICE, AND CARGO-HANDLING SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701687
SUBSTRATE PICKUP TOOL, SUBSTRATE ASSEMBLY STATION AND SUBSTRATE INSTALLATION METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12680265
Damping element for excavator buckets
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673431
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A SUBSTRATE IN CLEANING MODULES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668437
GRIPPING DEVICE FOR CRATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 791 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month