Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/572,171

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING MATERIAL PACKAGE, VIDEO EDITING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 19, 2023
Priority
Mar 29, 2022 — CN 202210320553.X +1 more
Examiner
TAYLOR, JOSHUA D
Art Unit
2426
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
316 granted / 535 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
566
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.1%
+44.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 535 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on December 30, 2025 has been entered. Claims 1, 2, 4-15, 18, 19 and 21-23 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-15, 18, 19 and 21-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claims contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventors, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The newly amended independent claims recite “in response to assigning a publishing license identifier to one of the specified materials, identifying the one of the specified materials as a target material (emphasis added by Examiner).” Examiner can find nothing in Applicant’s disclosure as originally filed to support such an amendment. Examiner cannot find discussion of doing anything responsive to assigning anything, let alone assigning a publishing license identifier, nor can Examiner find any discussion that involves both a publishing license identifier and anything to do with the word response, responsive, or any other version of that word. Thus, Examiner concludes that the limitation in question is not supported. Appropriate correction is required. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to all claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Claims 1, 2, 4-15, 18, 19 and 21-23 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Joshua D Taylor whose telephone number is (571)270-3755. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nasser Goodarzi can be reached at 571-272-4195. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joshua D Taylor/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2426 May 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 02, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677025
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR PRESENTING MEDIA CONTENT
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671875
LIVE-STREAM PREVIEW METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659264
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING AN ACTIVE PATH INVENTORY BASED ON PATH CACHING AND DISTRIBUTION TECHNIQUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647481
System and method for information retrieval using dynamic sharding
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12627861
METHOD OF CONTROLLING ENERGY CONSUMED BY A MULITMEDIA STREAMING APPLICATION
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+31.3%)
3y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 535 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month