Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/572,192

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING ULTRASONIC IMAGING WITH ROW-COLUMN ADDRESSING

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Examiner
ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Moduleus
OA Round
2 (Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
54%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
218 granted / 415 resolved
+0.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
478
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 415 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 3-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the individual contribution of at least one elementary ultrasonic transducer of the array" in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the elementary transducers of the array" in Lines 15 and 16. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Previously an array of elementary ultrasonic transducers was recited in the claim preamble. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the respective weights" in line 20. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The last limitation does not appear to be accurate grammatically. The limitation states wherein the coefficients of the matrix A are representative … of the array, to the variable electrical quantity. The comma appears to be a typo or possibly words are missing from the position following the comma. Dependent claims are rejected for failing to remedy the same issue. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN D ARMSTRONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7339. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Isam Alsomiri can be reached at 571-272-6970. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN D ARMSTRONG/ Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 23, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12566264
ENHANCED RESOLUTION SPLIT APERTURE USING BEAM SEGMENTATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12535001
DOWNHOLE ACOUSTIC SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A RATE OF PENETRATION OF A DRILL STRING AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12510644
Ultrasonic Microscope and Carrier for carrying an acoustic Pulse Transducer
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12504525
OBJECT DETECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12495789
ULTRASONIC GENERATOR AND METHOD FOR REPELLING MOSQUITO IN VEHICLE USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
54%
With Interview (+1.5%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 415 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month