Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/572,429

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS USING A COMBINATION OF AT LEAST ONE FIBER AND AT LEAST ONE PROBIOTIC TO IMPROVE MICROBIOME RESILIENCE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Priority
Jun 22, 2021 — provisional 63/213,280 +1 more
Examiner
ARIANI, KADE
Art Unit
1651
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Nestlé S.A.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
624 granted / 834 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
860
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 834 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The amendment and response filed on July 15, 2026 are received. Claim 17 is canceled, and new claims 18-23 are added. Claims 1-13, 16 and 18-23 are pending, claims 1-4 and 6-13 are withdrawn from further consideration, and claims 5, 16 and 18-23 are being examined. Answer to Arguments: Withdrawn Rejection(s): The rejection of claims 5 and 16-17 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu et al. as evidenced by Wikipedia, is withdrawn due to the amendment to the claims filed on 07/15/2026. Applicant arguments with respect to the above-mentioned rejection is moot because the rejection is withdrawn, and further in view of the new ground of rejection issued due to the amendment to claims filed on 07/15/2026. Applicant's amendment to claim 5 necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Objection(s): Claims 5, 16 and 18-23 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claims 5, 16 and 18-23, line 1, after the claim numbers insert --.--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejection - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 5, 16 and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The invention appears to employ a specific strains: Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, Bifidobacterium lactis BI-04, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Bifidobacterium longum BL- 05, Lactobacillus plantarum Lp-115, Bifidobacterium bifidum Bb-06, and Lactobacillus gasseri Lg-36. It is not clear if the written description is sufficiently repeatable to avoid the need for a deposit. Further it is unclear if the starting materials were readily available to the public at the time of invention. It is not clear if the deposit meets all of the criteria set forth in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809. Applicant or applicant's representative may provide assurance of compliance with the requirements of 35 U.S.C § 112, first paragraph, in the following manner. SUGGESTION FOR DEPOSIT OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL A declaration by applicant, assignee, or applicant's agent identifying a deposit of biological material and averring the following may be sufficient to overcome an objection and rejection based on a lack of availability of biological material. 1. Identifies declarant. 2. States that a deposit of the material has been made in a depository affording permanence of the deposit and ready accessibility thereto by the public if a patent is granted. The depository is to be identified by name and address. 3. States that the deposited material has been accorded a specific (recited) accession number. 4. States that all restriction on the availability to the public of the material so deposited will be irrevocably removed upon the granting of a patent. 5. States that the material has been deposited under conditions that access to the material will be available during the pendency of the patent application to one determined by the Commissioner to be entitled thereto under 37 CFR 1.14 and 35 U.S.C § 122. 6. States that the deposited material will be maintained with all the care necessary to keep it viable and uncontaminated for a period of at least five years after the most recent request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposited microorganism, and in any case, for a period of at least thirty (30) years after the date of deposit for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever period is longer. 7. That he/she declares further that all statements made therein of his/her own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and further that these statements were made with knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the instant patent application or any patent issuing thereon. Alternatively, it may be averred that deposited material has been accepted for deposit under the Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the purpose of Patent Procedure (e.g. see 961 OG 21, 1977) and that all restrictions on the availability to the public of the material so deposited will be irrevocably removed upon the granting of a patent. Additionally, the deposit must be referred to in the body of the specification and be identified by deposit (accession) number, date of deposit, name and address of the depository and the complete taxonomic description. Copy of deposit receipt is/are required. Conclusion(s): No claim(s) is allowed at this time. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KADE ARIANI whose telephone number is (571)272-6083. The examiner can normally be reached IFP, Monday - Friday, 8:00 AM -4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Melenie L. Gordon can be reached at (571)272-8037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KADE ARIANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697358
LACTIC ACID BACTERIAL COMPOSITION FOR MODULATING IMMUNE CELL DIFFERENTIATION AND/OR REDUCING PRO-INFLAMMATORY CYTOKINE SECRETION AND USE THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697359
COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING HAIR LOSS AND PROMOTING HAIR GROWTH COMPRISING POSTBIOTIC COMPONENTS FROM HEAT-TREAT LIMOSILACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM LM1020
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12678467
MIXED BIFIDOBACTERIUM STRAIN WITH EXCELLENT PRODUCTIVITY AND ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY, AND USES THEREOF
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673904
MICROBIAL INOCULANT FOR HIGH-SPEED HUMIFICATION OF ORGANIC WASTE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667607
METHODS OF REDUCING COLLAGENASE-MEDIATED BRUISING IN A SUBJECT HAVING CELLULITE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.4%)
2y 9m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 834 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month