Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/572,508

COMPOSITION FOR DETECTING MICROBIAL ON-SITE CONTAMINATION AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Priority
Jul 13, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0091587 +1 more
Examiner
GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE
Art Unit
1682
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
BIONANO HEALTH GUARD RESEARCH CENTER
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
377 granted / 822 resolved
-14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
85 currently pending
Career history
907
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§103
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 822 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the papers filed May 15, 2026. Currently, claims 1-17 are pending. Claims 16-17 have been withdrawn as drawn to non-elected subject matter. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election of Group I, Claims 1-15 in the paper filed May 15, 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.03(a)). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority This application claims priority to It is noted that a translation of the foreign document has not been received. Drawings The drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112- Second Paragraph The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 7-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. A) Claims 7-13 are indefinite because it claims both product and methods steps for using the products. Claim 7 is directed to “the oligonucleotide probe is cleaved by a nucleotlytic reaction”. Claim 11 is also directed to the biotin binds the at least one biotin-affinity protein which is a method step/limitation. As the limitations of the claim are drawn to a method step, and not to a further product limitation of the kit, there is confusion as to when direct infringement occurs. See MPEP 2173.05(p). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KR2011-0102842 (September 19, 2011)(Translation attached). KR2011-0102842 teaches real-time detection of Salmonella using cleavable chimeric probes. KR2011-0102842 teaches the Salmonella probe may be attached to a solid support. PNG media_image1.png 478 686 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to Claims 2-3, Salmonella is a gram negative bacteria. With respect to Claim 4, KR2011-0102842 teaches probes can be attached to the solid support by attaching a 3’ or 5’ terminal nucleotide of the probe to the solid support. With respect to Claim 5, the solid surface may be polystyrene, avidin coated polystyrene bead cellulose, nylon, acrylamide gel and activated dextran, controlled pore glass (CPG), glass plates and Highly cross-linked polystyrene. With respect to Claim 6, the probe comprises a donor and quencher label. With respect to Claim 7, RNase H is present to cleave probes. With respect to Claims 8, 10-13, the label may be a fluorescent label such as a FRET pair. Detectable label may also, any useful linker molecule (e.g., biotin, avidin, strap bit avidin, HRP, protein A, protein G, an antibody or a fragment thereof, Grb2, polyhistidine, Ni 2 +, FLAG tag, myc Tags), heavy metals, enzymes (e.g. alkaline phosphatase, peroxidase and luciferase), electron donors / acceptors, acridinium esters, dyes and calorimetric substrates It includes. With respect to Claim 9, the claim includes a method step that does not appear to materially limit the product claims. With respect to Claim 14, the probe is a single strand. With respect to Claim 15, the solid support may be in a kit comprising a packaging unit having one or more reaction reagents for real-time detection of Salmonella target nucleic acid in the sample. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Smith et al. (US 8,278,048, October 2, 2012). Smith teaches a solid support with an oligonucleotide probe immobilized thereto. Smith teaches the probe may be for bacteria, fungi, protozoa (column 2, lines 1-5). PNG media_image2.png 580 834 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 2-3, Smith teaches analysis of microorganisms including E. coli, which is a gram-negative bacteria (para 2, lines 12-15). With respect to Claim 4, the probe (101) is attached thru the 5’ or 3’ end to the solid surface. With respect to Claim 5, Examples of solid supports include, without limitation, a well of a microtiter plate (e.g., a 96-well microtiter plate or ELISA plate), beads (e.g., magnetic, glass, plastic, or gold-coated beads), slides (e.g., glass or gold-coated slides), micro- or nano-particles (e.g., carbon nanotubes), platinum solid supports, palladium solid supports, and a surface of a chamber or channel within a microfluidic device (col, 24, lines 48-60). With respect to Claim 6, the oligonucleotide probe may have a restriction endonuclease (Ra) attached. With respect to Claim 7, Smith teaches the probe may be contacted with a sample to form a double-stranded section that may be cut with a recognition restriction endonuclease to clear the endonuclease. With respect to Claim 8, Smith teaches the label can be a fluorescent label, a radioactive label, an enzyme label, or a redox label (col. 3, lines 20-30). With respect to Claim 10-11, Smith teaches biotin can be a component of signal expansion nucleic acid or reporter nucleic acid. The biotin can be indirectly attached to a solid support that is coated with streptavidin via a biotin-streptavidin interaction. With respect to Claim 12-14, Smith teaches an oligonucleotide probe may be biotinylated at the 3’end was conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The HRP conjugate was incubated with a streptavidin coated ELISA plate to immobilize the HRP oligonucleotide probe to the surface via a biotin-streptavidin interaction (Example 1, col 34). The plate was incubated with a restriction endonuclease BfaI and cleaved a double stranded target-probe hybrid to release the HRP-oligonucleotide into the solution and further detected. With respect to Claim 15, Smith teaches a kit comprising the solid support. Conclusion No claims allowable over the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEANINE ANNE GOLDBERG whose telephone number is (571)272-0743. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wu-Cheng Winston Shen can be reached on (571)272-3157. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEANINE A GOLDBERG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1682 July 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698539
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF A CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATION IN BRASSICA NAPUS
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12674205
CBX6 AS EPIGENETIC MARKER FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF IMMUNE CELLS, IN PARTICULAR MEMORY B CELLS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12637721
Novel Y-Chromosomal Short Tandem Repeat Markers for Typing Male Individuals
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12606838
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED PROTEIN PRODUCTION IN FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL CELLS
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606873
DETECTING NEOPLASM
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+40.9%)
3y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month